tourney to expand to 68 teams

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
NCAA to expand March Madness from 65 to 68 teams

By MICHAEL MAROT, AP Sports Writer 2 minutes ago



INDIANAPOLIS (AP)?The NCAA is on the verge of expanding the men?s basketball tournament from 65 to 68 teams beginning next year and announced a new, $10.8 billion broadcasting deal with CBS Sports and Turner Broadcasting on Thursday that will allow every game to be shown live for the first time.

?This is an important day for intercollegiate athletics and the 400,000 student-athletes who compete in NCAA sports,? interim NCAA president Jim Isch said. ?This agreement will provide on average more than $740 million annually to our conferences and member schools.?

Any move had hinged on the NCAA?s $6 billion, 11-year television deal with CBS. The deal, signed in 1999, had a mutual opt-out until July 31 and the NCAA took it amid speculation that ESPN might become a partner in one of the most popular and lucrative tournaments in sports.

Instead, the NCAA struck a 14-year agreement with CBS and Turner Broadcasting System Inc. The deal, which runs from 2011 through 2024, will show every game live across four national networks for the first time in the tournament?s 73-year history.

Sean McManus, president of CBS News and Sports, said the ?new strategic partnership? was a core asset?and a profitable one.

The men?s tournament last expanded in 2001, adding one team to the 64-team field that was set in 1985, and talk of tweaking March Madness again had generated a lot of criticism from fans and bracket-fillers worried about watering down the competition.

The NCAA studied expanding the tournament to 68, 80 or even 96 teams, with the latter option likely enveloping the 32-team NIT. But the NCAA said that the Division I Men?s Basketball Committee unanimously passed the 68-team proposal and it will be reviewed by the Board of Directors on April 29.

The proposal is strictly for the men?s tournament. Another NCAA committee is looking at whether to expand the women?s tournament or keep it in the current format.
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
what crap. So there can be 3 more at large teams from the big conferences that won't make it to the second weekend.

espn.com had a poll about what size you would like to see the NCAA field. Their choices were 65, 68 and 96. What about 64?
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
what crap. So there can be 3 more at large teams from the big conferences that won't make it to the second weekend.

espn.com had a poll about what size you would like to see the NCAA field. Their choices were 65, 68 and 96. What about 64?

well.....much better than 31 extra teams making it; all of whom will be hovering around .500; making the tournament a 7 round affair rendering the regular season and conf tournaments completely irrelevant
 

Jinxbreaker

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2005
2,170
9
0
Kernersville NC
Box what's your take on this?? I love the idea of 3 more teams and all 1 seeds get treated the same. All games mean something in reg season also. I'm glad they got this right.
 

Theboundbook

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2002
32,998
25
0
55
Salt Lake City, Utah
Box what's your take on this?? I love the idea of 3 more teams and all 1 seeds get treated the same. All games mean something in reg season also. I'm glad they got this right.

I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.... I love this... I wish there could be say another 10 teams in (which, yes, I realized fuk the bracket all up), but it would help those "bubble teams" that REALLY DESERVE to GET IN, GET IN. And not bring in garbage... I think the 68 is about as good as they can do without bringing in MORE NON DESERVING teams.. This should do more help than damage....
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.... I love this... I wish there could be say another 10 teams in (which, yes, I realized fuk the bracket all up), but it would help those "bubble teams" that REALLY DESERVE to GET IN, GET IN. And not bring in garbage... I think the 68 is about as good as they can do without bringing in MORE NON DESERVING teams.. This should do more help than damage....

:rolleyes:

bubble teams that deserve to get in? If they deserved it so bad they would win more games and make their case rock solid and not be a bubble team. I think it is ridiculous that more teams get treated like step-kids that have to play an "opening round" game.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top