Tragic News Story

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,551
361
83
nc
Killing of family dog unfolds on videotape


An image from the Jan. 1 THP video recorded by a dashboard camera in a patrol car


VIDEO: MAC | PC
Full clip (TRT 1:20): MAC | PC
NOTE: Video contains graphic and potentially disturbing images. Viewer discretion is advised.







By LEON ALLIGOOD
Staff Writer


Review finds officers acted properly in stopping car

Three minutes and seven seconds tells the story of a dog named Patton.

The dog, which was shot at close range Jan. 1 by a Cookeville policeman during a felony traffic stop, belonged to the James Smoak family of Saluda, N.C. At the time, the Tennessee Highway Patrol suspected the Smoaks ? James, his wife, Pamela, and his stepson, Brandon Hayden ? were involved in a Nashville-area robbery.

Yesterday, the Tennessee Highway Patrol acknowledged there was no robbery, just a calamitous mix-up in communications between dispatchers working for two separate patrol offices. This failure to communicate led to the shooting of the Smoaks' dog, an incident that was preserved on videotape by a dashboard camera in a patrol car.

Even so, the THP officers did not act inappropriately by making the felony stop, according to an internal investigation.

''Our investigation has found that our troopers on the scene that night ? Trooper David Bush, Trooper Jerry Phann and Lt. Jerry Andrews ? did have probable cause to conduct what in police terms is called a 'felony stop' of a motorist,'' said Beth Tucker Womack, spokeswoman for the Department of Safety. The THP is part of the Safety Department.

A felony stop is ordered when the occupants of a car are thought to have been involved in a crime.

Likewise, the Cookeville Police Department's internal investigation determined that its officers, who were providing backup for the troopers, ''performed their duties according to training and policy,'' said department spokesman Capt. Nathan Honeycutt.

As for the shooting of the family pet, Officer Eric Hall said the dog was coming at him aggressively when he fired.

The animal ''singled me out from the other officers and charged toward me growling in an aggressive manner,'' Hall wrote in his incident report, which was included in documents released yesterday.

Officers called the dog a pit bull that made a tense scene even more tense. Last week, the Smoak family called the dog a mixed-breed bulldog that was as gentle as ''Scooby Doo.''

Yesterday, the videotape of the stop was released for the public to decide.

The action begins as the Smoaks' car is pulled over in Putnam County. A green sign pointing to the Algood exit is seen in the frame just ahead of the family's stopped station wagon. Tractor-trailers and cars whiz by in the flash of the cruiser's blue lights.

Thirty-eight seconds into the stop, State Trooper David Bush calls the driver out of the car.

One minute and 30 seconds after their car was pulled over, Pamela Smoak and her son, 17-year-old Brandon, are ordered out of the car. They comply.

By 2 minutes, all three of the Smoaks are kneeling on the ground, being handcuffed as the Cookeville officers, in their role as backup protection, train their shotguns on the three.

At 2:18, James Smoak asks: ''What did I do?'' He is suspected in an area robbery, Bush replies.

Seconds later the North Carolina man tells officers that dogs are in the car. A beat later Smoak tells the troopers again that dogs are in the car.

Until 3:05 into the tape, the felony stop is textbook. The suspects are handcuffed and contained.

But then Patton appears.

The light-colored canine bounds from the passenger side door, travels outside the camera's right view for a second and then reappears, following Cookeville Officer Hall, who is backing up with his shotgun trained on the dog.

At 3:07, Hall fires. The dog falls and rolls over, dead. Each of the Smoaks cries out in anguish as their pet lies bleeding just a few feet from where they are handcuffed. ''Why'd you shoot my dog? Why'd you shoot my dog?'' James Smoak can be heard crying repeatedly.

How this unfortunate event came to pass is what the top brass of the Department of Safety and the Cookeville Police Department gathered to explain yesterday afternoon during a news conference.

According to Womack, the incident began when a woman traveling east on I-40 called the Nashville THP dispatcher at 4:52 p.m. She reported that she had been passed by a green station wagon traveling at a high rate of speed. The woman said an amount of money had been thrown out the window.

As all involved later found out, Smoak had left his wallet on top of his car when he bought gas on Old Hickory Boulevard in Hermitage. Apparently, the wallet stayed on the car until it passed the Mt. Juliet exit, at which point it fell, scattering more than $400 in small bills over the interstate median. Troopers recovered the cash and returned it to Smoak.

But, at the time the wallet fell off the car, the alert cell phone user was suspicious of the cash and the green car. She called the highway patrol.

Dispatcher Shannon Pickard of the Nashville office told investigators the woman believed the out-of-state car had ''been up to something.'' His statement was provided to reporters yesterday.

According to Womack, Pickard issued a bulletin at 5 p.m. to all Middle Tennessee law enforcement agencies to inquire whether any robberies had occurred involving a green station wagon with out-of-state tags. No replies fitting the description were received.

In Cookeville, THP dispatcher Timothy Glenn McHood issued a BOLO notice, which means ''be on the lookout,'' to the troopers in his area. In an interview with THP investigators, McHood said he noted that the green station wagon ''could possibly'' have been involved in a robbery.

At 5:07 p.m., the THP report noted, Trooper Bush spotted the Smoaks' car.

According to Womack, this incident has led to an examination of the department's radio room procedures, particularly as to documentation. Some of the messages between Nashville and Cookeville cannot be substantiated because the operators communicated using a phone that is not recorded.

Meanwhile, the Cookeville Police Department has instigated a third-party examination of the situation. A police chief in Gaithersburg, Md., will conduct an independent investigation. Officer Hall has been reassigned to an administrative position pending the outcome of that investigation.

The Smoaks, contacted at their home, offered no comment on the tape or on THP's ruling, but said they were in the process of hiring a lawyer to represent them in possible litigation.
 

Spock

Vulcan Visitor
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2001
7,577
0
0
67
Canada
just saw the tape .. the officer shud be put in a dog prison where the canines will eat him alive ..

i hope the family gets the whole police dept budget for next year .. and the officer gets bitten by a pit dog 5 times ..

thats it.



:rolleyes:
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
44,734
2,654
113
On the course!
I don't know.......I mean, I guess those billies could have closed the door on the car, but once that dog bounded out, he didn't look too friendly to me!

As a cop, are you going to assume that he wants to play? Are you going to assume that he isn't going to tear the shit out of you?

I would hate to be anyone involved in this, but I can't fault the cop who shot.
 

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,551
361
83
nc
yyz, the issues i see are twofold:


1) should thes people, given the information available to the police, have been subjected to a felony stop? i can assure you that there is not an unbiased authority on police protocol anywhere that would justify the handling of this stop.


2) given the obvious control the police had over the situation at the time, was deadly force the only reasonable option available to quell the dog threat? since the man can be heard repeatedly telling the cops to close the car door so the dog doesn't get out, i think the answer to that question is also obvious.


and yyz, you really think the dog in that video looks capable and imminently ready to tear the shit out of someone? looks to me like one swift kick would have solved the problem. deadly force is simply way out of line. if you had been kneeling on the ground that night i bet you'd see it differently. again, my sentiments may be skewed because i know this is not an isolated incident, as i see something like it almost every day.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
44,734
2,654
113
On the course!
Loopster,

I don't know what the 'witness' told the police, but that wasn't a part of what I said, either. That is a separate issue/arguement.

Did the police have control of that situation? Not if a dog came running out of the car! It was handled in a piss poor manner, and there is no doubt about that. Yes, the people did say we have a dog in the car. But, whether the cops should have shut the door, is not really a good issue, either. How do the police know that there is not another person in that car?

If I was the last one out of that car, I would have closed the door. The police might have sreamed, "Open that door back up!", but you could have at least pled a better case to them.

We know nothing about this case, other than seeing a sad video.

The officers are responding to a call that that were dispatched to. They were told the suspects were wanted in a possible robbery. Now, excuse me.......but they don't get to question the calls that they get.

Whether or not the call was warrented, is not something that they knew at this time. Yes, by all appearences, it was a family on their way to/from some place. Then again, we knew the story about the video that we would be seeing.....they had no idea what to expect.

Could the policeman who shot the dog done something else? Sure! But, again, this is a highly tense situation, with weapons drawn! This is not a video game on PS2, or a simulated stop. The average police officer will rarely, if ever, draw his firearm in the line of duty, and an extremely small percentage will fire that weapon.

This animal bounded from that car, and was not standing still, or even walking......it ran. And it ran, and jumped, at the officer who ultimately shot it. Could he have reacted in a different way? Yes. Was he wrong in his actions? I don't think so. To answer you question: Yes. I think a reasonable person could assume this dog was a threat.

In retrospect, one could say that if the dog was vicious, he would have left the car immediately after the family did. That was far from the case, as we could all see. I mean, what dog would sit in the car for two minutes before attacking? But, I was not standing at that dark roadside, conducting a felony stop, and "run down" by a dog, either. This was indeed a tragidy, but I don't think the police over-reacted, given the knowledge that they had, which, unfortunately, was minimal.

Hopefully, this will be used as a training tape. IMO, after seeing this a few times, the one trooper could have easily enough shut the car door, and averted this whole situation.
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Our police are trained better then that. And get ready folks it's just starten. There about to give the police even more power. They do not need more. They need,, if they have not gotten good training. Mor of it. It's like our Teachers. Everyone gets on there ass if they dont keep there training up. Why because there working with our kids. Well these police need the best traning and need to be tested once a year to make sure they know what the hell there doing. Why becasue there working with and for all of us. It should start when they get the job. They get it because they can pass testing and earn the postion. Not just becuase there friends with Billy Bob the mayor. This is now part of home land security. Chit I feal so much safer now.
 

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
Dogs don't wag and trot when they are about to attack. That dog was being friendly and that @sshole pu$$y of an excuse for a cop shot him.

This is what happens when you let power-hungry a$$holes put a badge on. They think they are above the law and above the code of morality. I hope he gets shot the next time he acts friendly towards a stranger who is in a 'precarious' situation.

If he couldn't even handle that situation, imagine what he'd do to a human who he thought was threatening.

They really need to be more carefull who they give those badges out to. Egotistical, powerhungry, and overreactional people should be declined immediately.

The scary thing is that this sort of stuff happens quite often... the news doesn't always get wind of it though.

Interesting stories about Cookeville's finest....

http://www.putnampit.com/bandy.html
http://www.cookeville.com/news/1015257218/index_html
http://www.putnampit.com/drugsandpower.html


GO FIGURE:shrug:
 

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
but in retrospect... the cop was right in shooting the dog. the dog exited the vehicle and charged the officer. does the cop know the intent of the animal? no. does the cop know ANYTHING about the animal? does it have rabies? all the cop knows is that he is being charged by an animal. he has a split second to react and he did.

are the officers without fault? no. they blatantly failed to realize the possible danger posed by the animals even after it had been brought to their attention repeatedly by the owners. in that the officers are guilty of neglect. do i think they should be stripped of their badges? not for this incident no. but i think there may be more going on at this dept. than meets the eye. a full investigation of the dept. may be in order. what the officers do require is a suspension with pay and mandatory training classes. they handled this situation very very incorrectly in my eyes. thankfully noone was hurt by their improper actions. but it could have been very different. one or more of those officers have no place on the streets at present. until they are, they need to stay behind a desk.

a terrible incident that was 100% avoidable.

remember guys, the officer had to decide A. what kind of dog is this? B. is the actions taken by the animal a threat or is it being playful? by the time you get the answers to these questions...... the dog already has a hold of you. we'd be calling the guy a moron if it had been a rott and he didn't fire because he wasn't sure wouldn't we? the officers error was not in whether or not he fired. their error occurred far before the animal exited the car.
 

taoist

The Sage
Forum Member
...new tourist policy....

...new tourist policy....

tn-welcome.jpg
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top