Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton?s Foundation Bag

Skulnik

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,748
1,010
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton?s Foundation Bags $145 Million

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...ium=social




Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton?s Foundation Bags $145 Million
AP Photo/Mikhail MetzelAP Photo/Mikhail Metzel
by BREITBART NEWS
13 May 2015
7,392
advertisement

A newly released GAI timeline depicts the sequence of events leading up to then-Sec. of State Hillary Clinton?s approval of the transfer of half of U.S. Uranium output (20% of all U.S. Uranium) to the Russian government in 2010.
Clinton?s State Department was one of eight agencies to review the deal, but Hillary Clinton was the only agency head whose family foundation bagged $145 million in donations, reports the New York Times and Clinton Cash.
 
Duff Miver

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
theGibber1 said:
Link?

Not being a smart ass I am genuinely interested..

I had read a pretty damning article about this in the New York Times which I believe is reputable
Click to expand...

How "damning" is the truth? The truth, not some factless book by a sleazebag author.

Even Faux Nuze doesn't believe it's true. Here, try this -

Chris Wallace, host of ?Fox News Sunday,? made that point when he questioned Schweizer about his lack of evidence connecting the donations to the uranium deal. (Fox News was among the media outlets that received an advance copy of his book.) Schweizer made the counterargument ? again without any evidence ? that the investors bought her silence by making contributions to the Clinton Foundation.

Schweizer speculated that investors were worried about Clinton?s history of opposing the sale of ?critical assets? in the U.S., citing her opposition as a senator to the 2006 sale of six U.S. ports to Dubai Ports World, a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates.

Wallace, April 26: Nine separate agencies and they [Clinton campaign officials] point out there?s no hard evidence, and you don?t cite any in the book that Hillary Clinton took direct action, was involved in any way in approving as one of nine agencies the sale of the company?

Schweizer: Well, here?s what?s important to keep in mind: it was one of nine agencies, but any one of those agencies had veto power. So, she could have stopped the deal. So, what?s interesting about this, of all those nine agencies, who was the most hawkish on these types of issues? Hillary Clinton. She had a reputation going back to the Dubai Ports deal.

But Schweizer is wrong when he says that Clinton had ?veto power? and ?could have stopped the deal.? At best, she could have forced the president to make a decision.
 
Duff Miver

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Skulnik said:
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton?s Foundation Bags $145 Million

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...ium=social




Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton?s Foundation Bags $145 Million
AP Photo/Mikhail MetzelAP Photo/Mikhail Metzel
by BREITBART NEWS
13 May 2015
7,392
advertisement

A newly released GAI timeline depicts the sequence of events leading up to then-Sec. of State Hillary Clinton?s approval of the transfer of half of U.S. Uranium output (20% of all U.S. Uranium) to the Russian government in 2010.
Clinton?s State Department was one of eight agencies to review the deal, but Hillary Clinton was the only agency head whose family foundation bagged $145 million in donations, reports the New York Times and Clinton Cash.
Click to expand...

Your quoting Breitbart?

Breitbart is known far and wide as an asshole who publishes one lie after another. Here, try some truth for a change.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/07/21/big-falsehoods-an-updated-guide-to-andrew-breit/168051
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Bet on MyBookie
Top