TRAP GAME ?

Tadpole Patti

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2014
328
44
28
The SBR (Sportsbookreview) has stated that the Cincinnati game being played today might be a trap game, and I quote, "A down East Carolina team could be a trap game that, even if it doesn't cost the Bearcats their unbeaten record, would put a scare in them".
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
When I see "Trap" posts I don't usually participate, but since there's a ? in your thread title, I take it you're asking about it, so I'll reply.

Regarding the betting odds, there is no such thing as a trap game.

Many people will argue that there is, but it's very likely that none of them has ever participated in making the lines that go up on the betting board. If they had, they'd know the concept of "trapping" the public, a discussion about "trapping" the public, the word "trap" and the phrase "Let's put up this number to trap the public" are not part of the meeting.

In the sample you gave above, I may be wrong, but I think what they're trying to say is Cincy could take the game lightly and get surprised, though that's not so much a "trap" as it would be a case of lack of preparation or being a bit too overconfident against a lesser opponent, which actually means they don't know anything about Luke Fickell.
 
Last edited:

Tadpole Patti

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2014
328
44
28
Thanks for your reply

Thanks for your reply

I threw that out there hoping someone would comment. I used to see "trap game" mentioned a lot but none recently. I appreciate your time explaining this to me.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
You're welcome, glad to help.

The "TRAP!" game people are still out there, I see them from time to time but I don't try to explain it to them because as they say, "There are none so blind as those who are not willing to see."

The "Trap" myth is similar to the "Vegas Fixes Games" myth, and the "Sharp Money/Public Money, Reverse Line Movement, Wise Guy's are on" myth.

Are games fixed?
It's happened. But not by a Vegas casino.
I told a story about this in another thread, I'll find it and post here in case anyone is interested.

As for "Sharp vs Public money" - I've been meaning to address that in a post, but haven't made time to do so yet. It will likely open a can of worms, like I said, "There are none so blind" etc, but I won't be posting the info for the need-to-believe'ers. If even one person opens their eyes it will be worth the time to share a little reality.



On Vegas fixing games . . .

To believe Vegas fixes games shows a staggering ignorance of the typical handle at a sports book as a % of annual revenue at a casino/hotel, not to mention the fear they have of the Nevada Gaming Commission.

True story, from a Super Bowl years ago:

A guy is screaming at one of my ticket writers. He had a $200 prop bet, * Strahan Over 3' tackles.

Strahan had 3, when Head Coach Coughlin pulls him out late in the fourth quarter.

The bettor swears that Strahan did not play the last series because we didn't want him to get a fourth tackle to make his ticket a winner. He actually accused us of having Strahan taken out of the game.

I asked, "So, let me get this straight. You think that we have Tom Coughlin's personal cell phone number.
And we called him. And he answered, DURING the Super Bowl, and we told him to pull Strahan, and he did, all so that you wouldn't be able to collect on a $200.00 bet. Is that correct
?"

And he looked at me, straight-faced, and said, "Yes."
This fool actually believed it.
He kept making a scene demanding a refund, so security removed him from the property.
They should have taken him to the loony bin.

Yes, game are fixed, history has proven that (just ask Tim Donaghy.)
Players, refs, coaches? Sure.
But not by Vegas.

* I have the year right, and know it was a prop on "Total number of tackles made." I may be incorrect in remembering it was Strahan, but the gist of the story is accurate.


Here's one more:

Years ago, there was a power outage that caused a football game to be stopped early. Wisconsin was in town to play the Rebels, at Sam Boyd Stadium. According to NGC laws, a contest has to go X amount of minutes for it to be official, otherwise the game must be refunded.

The Badgers were leading 27-7, and covering the spread, when the game was called.
Bettors with their money on Wisconson were pissed, and rightfully so, when they tried to collect on their bet but were given a refund.

The NGC Rules are posted in every sportsbook, for all to see.
There was no disputing the game qualified as a cancelled wager due to the early stoppage, but many Wisconsin bettors from across the country posted nonsense about the Vegas books calling Sam Boyd and telling them to shut the power to avoid paying out Badger bettors.

Setting aside the common sense that should inform a normal thinking person that the guys who run the power grid aren't in cahoots with and at the beck and call of the sportsbooks, this flies in the face of basic math and finance, as I noted yesterday:
To say Vegas books fix games, shows a staggering ignorance of:
the typical handle at a sportsbook as a % of annual revenue at a casino/hotel,
and the fear these businesses have of the Nevada Gaming Commission.

And to that, I'll add one other common sense tidbit: the knuckleheads screaming "FIX!" had no idea how much money was wagered at each house, side and total. The line rose due to Wisconsin money coming in, but at my house we had a few large bets on UNLV, and stood to profit off the game.
So, when"Vegas fixes games" do we, the bookmakers, contact each other to see who needs which team to win?
What if I need Team A, and another book needs Team B, how do we decide which way to fix the game?
The very concept is ridiculous.

And, the Badger betters also had no idea how much money was taken on the total, and if the house needed the Under or Over. The game was a sure Under, and what if houses had more money bet on the Over than on the Badgers, and the books also lost money there?

The entire concept that Vegas books are in cahoots on fixing games is nonsense.
Whenever you hear this nonsense, consider the source - it's always a guy who is angry because he lost his bet.
 
Last edited:

Jord20

Sharp
Forum Member
Jun 27, 2002
46,097
7,783
113
Chicago, IL
I think the original poster is referring to the "sandwich spot" or "look-ahead game" and not so much the number.

This is definitely a flat spot for the Bearcats - is it factored into the number is another question.

These are still 19 year old kids playing game, and I would argue that emotions and spots should definitely be considered. And, I for one, agree with the original post
 

yanno

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2001
3,679
183
63
Ontario
I for one would really like to hear your views on the "Sharp vs Public Money" and "Reverse Line Movement". I must admit that the reverse line movement "angle" seems to make some sense to me, but I would also admit that you know a whole lot more than I do. :0008

I don't see why there could not be an intelligent discussion of the subject, but....thanks if you try. :0corn

You're welcome, glad to help.

The "TRAP!" game people are still out there, I see them from time to time but I don't try to explain it to them because as they say, "There are none so blind as those who are not willing to see."

The "Trap" myth is similar to the "Vegas Fixes Games" myth, and the "Sharp Money/Public Money, Reverse Line Movement, Wise Guy's are on" myth.

Are games fixed?
It's happened. But not by a Vegas casino.
I told a story about this in another thread, I'll find it and post here in case anyone is interested.

As for "Sharp vs Public money" - I've been meaning to address that in a post, but haven't made time to do so yet. It will likely open a can of worms, like I said, "There are none so blind" etc, but I won't be posting the info for the need-to-believe'ers. If even one person opens their eyes it will be worth the time to share a little reality.
 

ChasDee

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 14, 2011
2,956
975
113
You're welcome, glad to help.

The "TRAP!" game people are still out there, I see them from time to time but I don't try to explain it to them because as they say, "There are none so blind as those who are not willing to see."

The "Trap" myth is similar to the "Vegas Fixes Games" myth, and the "Sharp Money/Public Money, Reverse Line Movement, Wise Guy's are on" myth.

Are games fixed?
It's happened. But not by a Vegas casino.
I told a story about this in another thread, I'll find it and post here in case anyone is interested.

As for "Sharp vs Public money" - I've been meaning to address that in a post, but haven't made time to do so yet. It will likely open a can of worms, like I said, "There are none so blind" etc, but I won't be posting the info for the need-to-believe'ers. If even one person opens their eyes it will be worth the time to share a little reality.

It's clear to me at least, that you know what you're talking about. Thanks for your insight.
:0008
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Jord20: "I think the original poster is referring to the "sandwich spot" or "look-ahead game" and not so much the number."


Yes, that's what I thought also, it referred to the look ahead spot, not the numbers/game line trap. That's why I said, "I think what they're trying to say is Cincy could take the game lightly and get surprised."

Yes, it a flat spot, but, and just my opinion, I think Fickell will address it properly. If they lose ATS it will likely be because the # is high, and/or that's what happens from time to time, but his teams are usually well-prepared so I'm guessing it won't be much of a factor.

And yes, flat spots are definitely part of the conversation in the meetings/arguments on what # should go up on the board. The "look ahead" factor comes up, and the debate is over to what effect it will have on the contest, a lot or a little. Different odds makers offer their opinion and defend it.

I don't factor it as heavily in this game because of Fickell. I'm not right or wrong, its just my opinion.
I have them at 1-3 ATS as Favs of 20 or > this season and last season, so I'm not recommending a play on them by any means, in case anyone misreads me.
 
Last edited:

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Yanno: "I would also admit that you know a whole lot more than I do."

Chas: "It's clear to me at least, that you know what you're talking about."

There's a LOT I don't know about.

I know a little about odds making and sports books,
because, been there/done that, for a lot of years.
 
Last edited:

arrow

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2003
6,218
1,574
113
65
lubbock, Texas
exactly right Jord

exactly right Jord

I think the original poster is referring to the "sandwich spot" or "look-ahead game" and not so much the number.

This is definitely a flat spot for the Bearcats - is it factored into the number is another question.

These are still 19 year old kids playing game, and I would argue that emotions and spots should definitely be considered. And, I for one, agree with the original post


If you all look ahead to next week you might realize why this is stated as a trap game. Cincy plays there toughest game of the year in Central Fla.
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Arrow,
Good point on UCF, with only Temple and Tulsa left on their schedule, UCF is their toughest spot.
It's something to factor in.

To me, wagering is like chess - I try to see all the angles before making a move/wagering.

Right now, UCF is 4-2, not ranked Top 20.
Last year, UCF was 3-1, ranked 18 when Cincy played them. (Cincy won the game SU getting 4 pts.)
The week before the UCF game? Cincy beat Marshall 52-14, so look-ahead probably not much of a factor.

But . . . that was then, this is now. See the whole board:
Cincy was only a -4 Fav at Marshall, so it's easy to make the case that it wasn't quite the same look-ahead factor as tonight when they're 27 pt Favs.

And Fickell's not a big, in-your-face/run up the score kind of guy, with a comfortable 4th quarter lead he uses the clock wisely, puts in subs to get them some experience and keep his starters healthy.

Just things to think about.


THIS thread, to me, is an example of when a forum serves its best purpose - many people, contributing info, stats and opinions, from all sides, so we can all make informed decisions when placing a bet. (And then hope the refs don't screw us.)
 
Last edited:

Jord20

Sharp
Forum Member
Jun 27, 2002
46,097
7,783
113
Chicago, IL
If you all look ahead to next week you might realize why this is stated as a trap game. Cincy plays there toughest game of the year in Central Fla.

Yes, that was definitely part of my (incorrect result) angle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Jord20

Sharp
Forum Member
Jun 27, 2002
46,097
7,783
113
Chicago, IL
Arrow,
Good point on UCF, with only Temple and Tulsa left on their schedule, UCF is their toughest spot.
It's something to factor in.

To me, wagering is like chess - I try to see all the angles before making a move/wagering.

Right now, UCF is 4-2, not ranked Top 20.
Last year, UCF was 3-1, ranked 18 when Cincy played them. (Cincy won the game SU getting 4 pts.)
The week before the UCF game? Cincy beat Marshall 52-14, so look-ahead probably not much of a factor.

But . . . that was then, this is now. See the whole board:
Cincy was only a -4 Fav at Marshall, so it's easy to make the case that it wasn't quite the same look-ahead factor as tonight when they're 27 pt Favs.

And Fickell's not a big, in-your-face/run up the score kind of guy, with a comfortable 4th quarter lead he uses the clock wisely, puts in subs to get them some experience and keep his starters healthy.

Just things to think about.


THIS thread, to me, is an example of when a forum serves its best purpose - many people, contributing info, stats and opinions, from all sides, so we can all make informed decisions when placing a bet. (And then hope the refs don't screw us.)

Agreed - and you nailed it and probably kept some people off ECU. Good stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

RBD

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 23, 2020
1,274
50
48
Thanks, Jord.

This is why I lobby for more people to participate:

With all the good info being exchanged as we dissected this game, none of us mentioned an angle that came into play late in the game - what the announcers called "making a statement," and "sending a message."

I wasn't surprised when Fickell sent in his backup QB in the fourth quarter, with a big lead.
I don't know every coaches tendencies, but I know Fickell, as I described earlier in this thread.
But I WAS surprised when he let the kid throw a medium range pass.
I thought, "Probably just wants to get him some real time in-game experience."

But the fake punt??!!

As the announcers said, "He's sending a message to the playoff committee."

The possibility he might run up the score to make a statement about his 2020 team, rather than sitting on the lead late in the game, was a piece of the puzzle that would have been nice to have for consideration.

That's why I lobby for participation from members - the more people who add opinions, the more angles we have covered when making a final decision.

In the end, I couldn't pull the trigger on a side, laying or taking pts.
Didn't want to lay the big # with Fickell running the show, didn't want to take the pts either (I try to avoid betting on a team I know is going to lose in hopes they'll cover, especially on a # like 28.)

Undecided, I looked for someone in the forum with a strong opinion,
and tailed Wild Bill on the Over for some action. ("Well, that's one in a row for you, Wild Bill.")

Next time I seek an opinion when I haven't one of my own, I'm going to tail poster Elmer Fudd, based on my theory that, "He's a millionaire, and owns a mansion and a yacht."
So he must be doing something right, eh? (Someone will get that reference, right?)
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top