Treasury Details Internet Gambling Ban

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,712
599
113
75
Wednesday November 14, 3:12 pm ET
U.S. Treasury Department Outlines Exemptions on Internet Gambling Ban


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve continue to finalize a new rule that would put the onus on banks to help crack down on online gambling by U.S. citizens, a Treasury official said Wednesday.



In prepared remarks, Deputy Assistant Secretary Valerie Abend said banking regulators are focusing their efforts on banks that do business with gambling companies, as well as the interaction between U.S. banks and foreign banks that may be tied to online gambling.

Legislation passed by U.S. lawmakers last year required Treasury and the Fed to enact regulations aimed at preventing the flow of funds from gamblers to Internet gambling sites.

Included in that legislation were exemptions for certain financial institutions where it is "not reasonably practical" to prevent illegal Internet gambling. Abend said such exemptions would generally extend to the gambler's bank, but not banks that do businesses with firms that offer illegal gambling.

"In the case of checks, the check collection system is highly automated and it is not reasonably practical for the gambler's bank to know whether a check presented to it for payment involves unlawful Internet gambling," Abend said.

Conversely, she said, a gambling business' bank or the first U.S. bank to receive a check under the proposed rule would be required to have policies and procedures in place to stop the processing of a check.

A public comment period on the proposed rule is scheduled to close Dec. 12. Abend said Treasury expects a large number of responses and would provide analysis and reasons for any decisions based on the comments received.
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,897
708
113
50
TX
What about WU? How in the world can they police them? I have never used a bank to fund an online account.
 
Last edited:

Dr. Fade

Colllector
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
1,476
17
0
Kansas City
"God Bless America....."

This would piss me off even more if there were larger issues @ hand for the govt. to concern themselves with. But the public outcry demands that they throw their weight around and influence banking institutions and the rest of the "free" world.
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
Democrats Voice Displeasure With Internet Gambling Laws
November 15, 2007

The Democratic head of the House Judiciary Committee voiced frustration on Wednesday about what he said are disparities in the enforcement of U.S. Internet gambling laws.

Chairman John Conyers questioned "the selective nature" of Internet gambling enforcement and said a ban enacted by lawmakers last year could end up hurting U.S. relations overseas.

"Continuing with the same old failed policies for the sake of feel-good politics doesn't make sense," Conyers, of Michigan, said at a hearing on the issue.

Conyers did not signal whether he supports any changes to the current law. A bill introduced by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Barney Frank, of Massachusetts, would roll back the ban on Internet gambling that was enacted by Congress last year.

However, Conyers and several other lawmakers on the committee pressed officials from the Justice Department and Treasury Department at the hearing to explain why they are cracking down on some forms of Internet gambling but not others.

As part of the crackdown, two founders of payments processor NETeller Plc were arrested in January. In May online gambling operator BETonSPORTS Plc, pleaded guilty to U.S. racketeering charges and agreed to cooperate in a case against the company's founder and other co-defendants.

The Justice Department interprets a decades-old U.S. law, known as the Wire Act, as banning all forms of gambling over the Internet, although the gambling industry has argued the law only bars sports betting.

At Wednesday's hearing, Conyers and other committee members questioned why the Justice Department had not sought to prosecute other forms of Internet gambling, such as online horse-racing.

"To cherry pick ... is what I find to be particularly intellectually dishonest," said Rep. Robert Wexler, a Florida Democrat who has introduced a bill that would exempt poker and some other games from the Internet gambling ban.

Conyers also wanted to know why horse-racing and some other forms of gambling "will continue to proceed unfettered" under new regulations proposed last month by the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve.

The regulations were drawn up to enforce a law enacted by Congress last year that makes it illegal for banks and credit card companies to make payments to online gambling sites.

The ban has been closely monitored by investors in some British-based gaming companies, such as Partygaming Plc (PRTY.L: Quote, Profile , Research) and 888 Holdings Plc.

Conyers also echoed critics of the new Internet gambling ban, saying it could run afoul of the United States' international obligations.

European trade officials argue that the online gambling prohibitions discriminate against European companies that want to offer online gambling services in the U.S. market.

The World Trade Organization in March found U.S. prohibitions on online betting illegal in a complaint filed by Antigua and Barbuda several years ago. However, U.S. officials have said they will maintain the ban anyway and retroactively remove gambling services from its market-opening commitments
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top