Tues games

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
Well we are now in AL parks. If history means anything look for the unders to prevail and the home teams. With that said, I only know 1 ump. Wendlestead is in Ana. and you might have guessed, I come up with Phil and under. At least the under follows the IL trends. Be back as soon as I see the other umps. We have some good ones tonight. Look for unders and home favs.

Also like Balt o, Sea, Fla and TB o. Now if the umps like the same thing we're in business.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
These are all ump plays. Nothing real strong. CC, NYY u, and Bos u. I'll take an extra look at all unders tonight.
 

Spock

Vulcan Visitor
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2001
7,577
0
0
67
Canada
joe

what u feel about the Toronto total .. was @ 10 last night .. went upto 10.5 today ..

came back from work and find it back @ 10 ..

Had played it @ 10.5 .. . just wanted to know your opinions.

Also any specific factors why the al games would go under ?

Historically as u said the under must have cashed in more but just wondering if there is any particular reasons for that.

THanx and good luck
Spock
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
Spock, I show Scott with 6-5 under and two pushes. Another very weak signal calls for the over. Under the circumstances I can't make it a play but that is just me. The past two years, the under in AL parks were way more one sided than the overs in NL parks. Here's a few more where I know the umps.

Det and o, Cle u.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
Went with and going with

Bos u 9
Balt o 10'
Sea -150
Phil + 125
u 9'

Couldn't pass up Det in a par.

Good luck everyone.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
adding

Colo + 140

This is a very strong ump play.
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
any feel on that total gsp....radkes numbers at home are terrible




best of luck tonight

cooz
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
I have two different ways I track totals with umps. One is easy to track. how many overs compared to how many unders. The other is a little more complicated. The idea is to get both of them on the same page on the same day. Tonight they are exactly opposite, 7-5-1. The side is 13-0 for the year.
 

Spock

Vulcan Visitor
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2001
7,577
0
0
67
Canada
Hi joe ..

thanx .. was looking thru the Philly game and even though the Philly bats play Jekyl and Hyde .. most of my angles point to an Over.

Just wondering how strong the Under play is ..

Also any comments on the ATlanta game Total.

Cheers !!!
Spock
 

ontyme

Registered User
Forum Member
i was going to play Colorado as well----one of my system i use gave that as a play---but i pick and choose out of my system. But Colorado being bad road team --stayed away-- My day off yesterday made me a little passive today--Not risking much, just trying to bank a little. Passed on St.Louis too.---I'm sure we all have been there. Keep up the good info.--New to the forum but can regonize a good capper when i see one.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
I wouldn't have told this because I very seldom play over 1 unit but I very seldom say anything is strong. I put enough on Colo to cover my----self on my other plays. You probably won't pick up on this but Kulpa is 14-0 for me on the year. That's what I call a strong ump play. I still have Colo, Fla and Sea working for one of my pars. Bos and Balt totals were in the same par thank goodness. The par with Phil and u is history but the straight bets might save me some.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top