TUES TO SAT

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
STANFORD -2.5 8%


SOUTH MISS -8 7%


EAST CAR +6 5%


NMS +7.5 -115 5%




STAN OVER 71 4%

NEW MEX +7 4%

WASH STATE +11.5 5%

BYU -22 3%
 

Dirty Juice

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2009
262
4
18
Thunder, little analysis on stanford? I was thinking oregons speed combined with stanford being down a key receiver and the points look tasty. Although luck is so freggin good:shrug:
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
Thunder, little analysis on stanford? I was thinking oregons speed combined with stanford being down a key receiver and the points look tasty. Although luck is so freggin good:shrug:

STANFOORD IS 2ND IN THE COUNTRY AGAINST THE RUN - LUCK CA THROW AGAINST ANYBODY THERE HOME THERE BETTERI
 

TaterTot

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 13, 2007
43
5
0
Was this a good day? I mean some nice plays bit a shit ton of beta and more than a handful of losers
 
  • Like
Reactions: THE KOD

America's Team

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 18, 2008
501
83
28
what was the point of that post? Nothing but to start trouble. You don't like his plays, don't play them. Enough already.

:mj10: :bs: :0007
 

yak merchant

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2000
966
4
18
Texas
Was this a good day? I mean some nice plays bit a shit ton of beta and more than a handful of losers

Yes portfolio risk metrics are a real hot topic here at MadJacks. Beta? And what exactly are you using as the underlying to calculate this beta? If you want to discuss value at risk then maybe you can make an argument, but I suggest you go ahead and calculate his sharpe ratio (with a risk free rate of negative 4.5 percent) and his profit factor, for the the last 3 years in college football and report back to us. Thanks I'll be right here in front of the computer waiting for the results.
 

Cappin Kirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2003
746
6
0
Fargo, ND
Yes portfolio risk metrics are a real hot topic here at MadJacks. Beta? And what exactly are you using as the underlying to calculate this beta? If you want to discuss value at risk then maybe you can make an argument, but I suggest you go ahead and calculate his sharpe ratio (with a risk free rate of negative 4.5 percent) and his profit factor, for the the last 3 years in college football and report back to us. Thanks I'll be right here in front of the computer waiting for the results.

Well played sir! :0008
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top