of course,the msm needs to throw in these facts...
the offer includes the following mandatory conditions:
1. iran must give up heavy water reactors.
2. iran must give up uranium enrichment.
3. iran must give up uranium reprocessing.
4. iran must allow full intrusive inspections.
they`ll turn it down...and we`ll try and use this to push china and russia toward sanctions...
this is obviously a pawn in a gambit...
but,i believe a previous administration made a similar mistake with n.korea.... so,i guess it`s to much to ask that we we learn from that disaster.....sounds like " i`ll give you some of my lunch money as an incentive to not take all of it"..
anybody think about maybe building some reactors HERE......TO HELP ALLEVIATE OUR OIL DEPENDENCE?....
back on point.... sorry, but this deal is bad even if the media is misrepresenting it.....
we can be pretty sure that eurabia is offering iran a very nice gift package....and the bush admin has decided to go along.....
i read that we are offering spare parts for iran's u.s.-made fighter jets....
we are offering iran all sorts of nuclear goodies.
my question is...what is there to stop iran from taking the deal--the spare parts and the nuclear technology--and then backing out once the goods have been delivered?....
the only way this deal would benefit us is if the mullahs were overthrown in the meantime....
but if anything, this deal will strengthen their regime. ...
the ports...the border...now this.....
i think gwb has become demonically possessed by the spirit of jimmy carter...
note to ahmadinnerjacket...if it comes in a box marked "acme," be vewwy caweful!....
it is truly 06/06/06
the offer includes the following mandatory conditions:
1. iran must give up heavy water reactors.
2. iran must give up uranium enrichment.
3. iran must give up uranium reprocessing.
4. iran must allow full intrusive inspections.
they`ll turn it down...and we`ll try and use this to push china and russia toward sanctions...
this is obviously a pawn in a gambit...
but,i believe a previous administration made a similar mistake with n.korea.... so,i guess it`s to much to ask that we we learn from that disaster.....sounds like " i`ll give you some of my lunch money as an incentive to not take all of it"..
anybody think about maybe building some reactors HERE......TO HELP ALLEVIATE OUR OIL DEPENDENCE?....
back on point.... sorry, but this deal is bad even if the media is misrepresenting it.....
we can be pretty sure that eurabia is offering iran a very nice gift package....and the bush admin has decided to go along.....
i read that we are offering spare parts for iran's u.s.-made fighter jets....
we are offering iran all sorts of nuclear goodies.
my question is...what is there to stop iran from taking the deal--the spare parts and the nuclear technology--and then backing out once the goods have been delivered?....
the only way this deal would benefit us is if the mullahs were overthrown in the meantime....
but if anything, this deal will strengthen their regime. ...
the ports...the border...now this.....
i think gwb has become demonically possessed by the spirit of jimmy carter...
note to ahmadinnerjacket...if it comes in a box marked "acme," be vewwy caweful!....
it is truly 06/06/06
Last edited:
