UBL

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Has tape coming out--from reading preview below--any wagers he'll give the Dems credit on his talking points--If so-- how do you think he'll pronouce Harry Reids name??--my guess Hawwy Weed

DUBAI (Reuters) - Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden will address the people of Europe in a message to be posted on the Internet "soon," an Islamist Web site said on Monday.

"Soon, God willing, (we will post) a new message to the European people from the lion Imam who defeated the Americans and tyrants, Sheikh Osama bin Laden," said the pro-al Qaeda Web site which regularly posts messages from the militant leader.

"Let this message be posted by various Western Web sites so that we deliver to them the truth of their lost war and (confront) them with the purposely hidden fact," it said, adding that the message was produced by al Qaeda media arm As-Sahab.

It did not give any further details.

The Web site did not give a specific timeframe, but usually messages are released within 72 hours after they are announced.

Bin Laden's last message was released on October 22. The Saudi-born militant then urged unity between Iraq's Sunni rebels.

Per his comment I believe the Camel Express must a few months behind on delivering the news in Iraq.

 

[smurphy]

--any wagers he'll give the Dems credit on his talking points--If so-- how do you think he'll pronouce Harry Reids name??--my guess Hawwy Weed

You do yourself and the country a massive disservice when you say bullshit things like this. I want to like and respect you, but this kind of garbage is so dumb it makes it difficult.

 

[AR182]

I want to like and respect you, but this kind of garbage is so dumb it makes it difficult.

please try harder....

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Thats kinda how I feel about liberals Smurph--

Tough being a vet and have party leaders and their base pandering to code pinko's using same squaking points as terrorist--banning recruiters--running front page stories for 52 days parralell to Aljazeera-on embarrassing those who bomb children and chop heads--promoting movies depicting our troops in worse light--ect

You think it's nonsense--We'll see if UBL comes out in support of a party again near election--one thing about it--he'll have to change his last script-anybody but Bush-and where have I heard that before.

as far as doing my country disservice--I believe that would depend on interpt of which segment of country--and who you allign with. The ones who fight to keep us free or the ones who use these freedoms to diss those that do the fighting.
My opinion of those doing a dissservice--is liberals who pres candidates--party leaders--code pinko's tell our troops they already lost/can't win ect--but thats just my opinion. I must agree I'm a little biased as I've seen them snatch a retreat from jaws of victory before--and then gloat on how "we" lost the war.

If you don't like the war/wars fine--there is no draft but keep the whining amongs yourselves--and let those who volunteer to carry the load alone.

 

[StevieD]

Didn't Bush get that guy yet?

 

[smurphy]

Dogs, nobody here whines as much as you.

 

[bjfinste]

Dogs, nobody here whines as much as you.

Exactly. It stuns me that anyone on this site can still take him even the slightest bit seriously anymore.

 

[Chadman]

Just think how little UBL would have to talk about if...

a. We would never had attacked Iraq in the first place, and

b. If we would have kept our forces and produced multiple surges into Afghanistan and even Pakistan (if that's where he headed off to, off and on) and killed the sorry S.O.B.

Then the blame would have been placed squarely where it belonged in the first place ON BIN LADEN - and none of this whining would be going on at all.

But, it's easier to blame the liberals for all of it, I suppose.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

I like your rebutles smurph/bjfinste When you have same undisputble chants from terrorists and Dem party--and that is none.
Here some more of your liberal freedoms--we all know your efforts to distribute condoms/birth contol pills to kids in school (as young as age 11)without parents permission--heres your next step in Mass-

"Parents who spank their kids - even in their own homes - would be slapped by the long arm of the law under an Arlington nurse?s proposal to make Massachusetts the first state in the nation to outlaw corporal punishment.

Kathleen Wolf?s proposed legislation will be debated at a State House hearing tomorrow morning.

If signed into law, parents would be prohibited from forcefully laying a hand on any child under age 18 unless it was to wrest them from danger, lest they be charged with abuse or neglect."
-------------------------------------------------------------

 

[smurphy]

What were we supposed to respond to? You didn't say anything. No point going in circles. You have made up your mind and will continue to accuse anyone with different political views as anti-American - even fellow Americans, even fellow veterans - ANYONE who simply feels differently than you is the enemy. All this despite the obvious hypocracies surrounding those you support - many of whom are more friendly with terrorists than those you hate and accuse will ever be. It reaches a point where there is no rebuttal. I will not go down the repeated Kosar-style laundry list, logically breaking apart many of your ridiculous statements - only to have you completely ignore them as if they were never posted.

You are what you are. Reckon I'll just let you go on your merry way. I'm sorry I responded at all.

 

[Chadman]

Here some more of your liberal freedoms--we all know your efforts to distribute condoms/birth contol pills to kids in school (as young as age 11)without parents permission

And most of the parents of these kids who also probably are against abortion at face value are probably the first ones who the law probably addresses..."Honey, don't have sex, condoms and birth control are not necessary, just abstain. Just don't get pregnant."

And, if they do get pregnant, they probably get the crap beaten out of them at home, because of the position they put the parents in, because they were as curious as most of us were growing up, or were pressured into something they otherwise wouldn't do, or they were simply forced to engage in those acts. Or they thought they were in love, and were horny, and knew they shouldn't, but they just made a mistake. They didn't follow the narrow, provided line from people who refuse to understand the pressures they go through, and refuse to allow for ANY kind of backup plan to prevent an unwanted and unplanned pregnancy. And it's always the kids fault.

I'm not saying kids shouldn't have sex, but I'm a realist and know that they will. They did back in the day, before my time, and will long after. I just don't think it's realistic to expect kids in this culture to only be abstinent, without providing them any other recourse, and then force them to have the child because abortion is "wrong." There's just too many factors that are wrong with that, in my mind. I think many of today's kids are smart enough to be smart about the use of birth control. Maybe not at age 11 - but in some areas, I think that might not be a bad idea either. Some folks around here cry about poor folks who breed babies and don't give a crap...maybe if they had access to condoms in school, then the cryers here wouldn't have to pay so much to take care of them and their offspring - which I think is their main issue with it to begin with?

 

[djv]

Kids do sex?? Well I guess if you look back 60/70years ago and you call 16/18 year olds kids. Chit they were getting married at that age. Just the way it was. Now they sack out at 15 just don't get married. During the civil war average age of marriage was 16/17. So not much new now they just don't get married to 23/24. But they do have sex thank god.

 

[pd1]

But damn it Billy got a blow job.

 

[Jabberwocky]

"If you don't like the war" --DTB
1. a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations; warfare, as by land, sea, or air.
2. a state or period of armed hostility or active military operations: The two nations were at war with each other.

Wayne, why do you continue to say this is a "war"? What nation are we at war with? The "war" ended in May of 2003, sorry you missed this bit of news. Mission accomplished.