Q is if peterson gets his yards will it be enough? if look closer at yesterday's numbers, peterson got much of his yardage in the 2h as tulsa's thin defense faded.
if you call peterson vs. ucla def. a mismatch then i can say ucla offense vs. oklahoma def. a mismatch.
wild line for sure considering last week it was ucla +8 .... ucla has been explosive vs crap, OU cant beat crap, TCU LOSES SU TO SMU, who hadnt beatn a ranked team since '86! .... will Stoops be able to do anything? I do see coaching mismatch but will it make a diff?
i, for one, have never seen a 'hairplugs for men play of the week' lose. save me a seat on the bruins bandwagon. plus, in what surely must be a sign from above... the playboy 'girls of the PAC 10' issue just arrived in my mailbox today. delicious. :clap: :clap:
Im pretty shocked at UCLA -7. How quickly the mighty Sooners have fallen, from the national championship game to a TD underdog against a middle of the pack Pac10 team in the same calendar year.
i guessed the line would be OU -3 b4 the rice/bruin game, then refigured it to pick 'em ... Im shocked it opened at 7 ... The books seemingly anticpated a huge Bruin landslide, how many times has a line moved 19 pts in 2 weeks? maybe never :scared ....
Im still mulling this one, could see a 10 pt+ win either way--so if I had any sense Id steer clear
i dunno... sounds to me like they are BEGGING for OU money. i gotta figure UCLA is the play. plus, didn't you read my comment about the playboy "girls of the PAC 10" issue? that's karma, baby.