UFC 321, October 25th, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
May 26, 2002
93,800
2,157
113
51
Canada
65 and Josh right, kickserv is wrong.

Once again...sixfive is wrong.

He had 5 minutes to see, his could not see.....really bad double eye poke....and fight called off, it is pretty simple, Gane is 100 percent to blame.

Sixfive = never right




Also Sixfive continues to say nothing about the nasty double eye poke from Gane, but yet, blames the other guy. I find that amusing.

Sixfive = blames the victim
 

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,773
256
83
54
BG, KY, USA
Once again...sixfive is wrong.

He had 5 minutes to see, his could not see.....really bad double eye poke....and fight called off, it is pretty simple, Gane is 100 percent to blame.

Sixfive = never right




Also Sixfive continues to say nothing about the nasty double eye poke from Gane, but yet, blames the other guy. I find that amusing.

Sixfive = blames the victim
No victim. No injury.

Sure; Gane poked him accidentally. It happens in mma. Fight goes on when there’s no injury.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
May 26, 2002
93,800
2,157
113
51
Canada
No victim. No injury.

Sure; Gane poked him accidentally. It happens in mma. Fight goes on when there’s no injury.

1. There was a victim, his name was Tom.

2. Nasty double eye poke caused an injury

3. Fight was stopped because Tom was unable to regain vision within 5 minute time limit

4. Gane poked him in both eyes.



Sixfive continues to blame the victim and says nothing about Gane being a dirty fighter (Gane has done this in the past)




Sixfive = always wrong
Sixfive = victim blamer
 

JOSHNAUDI

That Guy
Forum Member
Dec 12, 2000
10,298
392
83
49
Seguin, TX
www.schwartz-associates.com
3. Fight was stopped because Tom was unable to regain vision within 5 minute time limit
You have no proof that Tom was unable to regain vision and I have proof that he watched the replay and found out it was a double eye poke. He could see, kick. That's not an opinion, he fucking watched the replay in his interview with DC.

A doctor should be the sole judge of whether the fight can continue, not the combatant after a foul like that. AND YES IT WAS A FUCKING FOUL FOR FUCKS SAKE.

The doc ok'd it, Tom said he couldn't see. There's a problem with that. It's too subjective.

Herb said on Helen Yee Titties Sports that he thinks this will lead to some rule changes. Mandatory points being taken. Other changes as well. Along with taking the intent out of the equation. Herb said many retired combatants had admitted to purposely using low blows to buy rest time to Herb.

But the fighter who knows that if he says, I can't see, knows the fight will be called off and he either wins or no contest is dumb. Aljo'mit it, kick. You don't have to have the heart of a lion to know that's wrong.

Let the Doctors doctor. Let the fighters fight. Let the refs ref.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
May 26, 2002
93,800
2,157
113
51
Canada
You have no proof that Tom was unable to regain vision and I have proof that he watched the replay and found out it was a double eye poke.

Just because he could see out of one eye doesn't mean his vision was fine. His vision was compromised, and in the five minutes it did not come back. Nobody said he was totally blind.

If you can't see out of one eye, the fight will be stopped, and that is what happened.

The only one to blame for all of this is Gane.



Also...you have no proof he was able to regain his vision. Again, nobody, not even Tom said he was blind in those 5 minutes.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top