USC 2006 schedule

[blgstocks]

what is it with your 6-0 business? last time i checked ND is ONLY getting better. And SC is ONLY getting worse than last years matchup.

Scott, u need to quit talking to us like we are five and are wrong about EVERYTHING. "You forget how hard SC practices." LOL like Pete Carrol invented the practice or something.

FYI Frank Beamer had to close off his pre season practices from the media AND from other coaches INCLUDING pete carrol, because he thought it gave coaches to much of an edge. Carrol has gone on record as well saying that Beamer has the most effecitve practices of any coach in college football!

You have your opinions and I have mine. But i dont talk down to you like your stupid, i might talk to you like your a homer but theres a difference. You and I both saw SC backup QB last year and I won so many covers just on him alone. Everytimme SC got up 42 they would put in the garbage and give the other teams a chance and they would come back because he is not that good.

I might be wrong about his future, but justifying SC going undifeated with a completely fresh squad that HAS NOT proven itself outta high school, just because "they doubted Leinhart" and "they doubted Pete Carrol" sounds an awful lot like "just like Oklahoma last year" and if USC 10/1 to win NC sounds good to you then Arkansas at 75/1 must sound 7.5 times as good because its the same garbage bet.

I might be underestimating SC but I doubt it seriousl, I am probably OVER Estimating their competition in ASU, Cal and Oregon but I stand by a freshman SC squad and their "legendary superhero" band of WR to go 6-6

 

[wareagle]

USC couldn't win without Norm Chow and losing 3 other key position coaches.

.

how many national titles or BCS games has USC won without norm chow? :sadwave:

 

[Scott4USC]

Texas & their high school offense couldnt beat USC either.....but we all know how that story ends.

USC easily could have beat TEXAS and their High School Offense. USC lost to Vince Young (who was incredible) and USC beating themselves (which is a fact). USC is the better team but that is why they play the game. Better teams don't always win. Despite USC playing like $hit in 1h, USC still had 12pt 4th quarter lead. Not too shabby!

Since when did USC WR corps become legendary? WTF have they done to deserve this honor. To be legendary you must actually do something legendary. No, potential doesnt count. I didnt know the new Randy Moss, Tim Brown & Anthony Carter are playing for USC.

USC WR's this season will be LEGENDARY! Trust me. Dwane Jarret will be the #1 WR in the country. (duh) Patrick Turner was the #1 WR in the country out of high school last year and will have huge sophomore season. Especially with Jarret on the other side of field. Both Turner and Jarret are over 6.4. Pete Carroll himself says Turner is a lot better than MIKE WILLIAMS and DWANE JARRET! :scared USC's 3rd WR is Steve Smith who will be en experienced senior who should put together an awesome year. All 3 WR's without a doubt will play in the NFL and Turner and Jarret without a doubt be 1st round NFL future draft picks. USC backup WR's? How about a "motived" Whitney Lewis who was the #1 WR out of the country 3 years ago. (he has struggled with grades/injuries/weight the last 3 years) How about USC's 2 current WR commits who are currently ranked #1 and #6 in the country according to Scout. We all know freshman "can" produce right away at the WR position. THESE PLAYERS ARE ALL BACKUPS!

Back to the starters. Who can match up with Turner and Jarret? Both are over 6.4 with good speed for their size. NFL teams would have difficult time finding not 1 but 2 DB"s to match up with them. We are talking COLLEGE FOOTBALL where DB's are SMALL!

 

[Scott4USC]

what is it with your 6-0 business? last time i checked ND is ONLY getting better. And SC is ONLY getting worse than last years matchup.

I agree ND is getting better and USC beating ND will be a challenge. But 2 things make me very confident in that game. USC plays ND @USC and most importantly USC plays ND at the END of the season. Carroll always plays young plays and gets young players to produce at high level. Mostly because he gets the best players out of high school in recruiting. But USC always under PC has been vulnerable in the 1h of the season. USC always has been a machine in the 2h of the season. USC getting 6-0 will be a lot more difficult than USC beating ND @USC.

Scott, u need to quit talking to us like we are five and are wrong about EVERYTHING. "You forget how hard SC practices." LOL like Pete Carrol invented the practice or something.

According to NFL scouts USC practices harder than many NFL teams. According to CFB analysts USC practices harder than other CFB programs compared to what they have seen. According to sports radio analysts, USC practices harder than the other programs they have seen. PC runs very very intense practices and the players say practices are harder than the actual games.

FYI Frank Beamer had to close off his pre season practices from the media AND from other coaches INCLUDING pete carrol, because he thought it gave coaches to much of an edge. Carrol has gone on record as well saying that Beamer has the most effecitve practices of any coach in college football!

I did not know that but I do know PC welcomes the media at his practices and all the media has said USC practices harder than anyone else.

You have your opinions and I have mine. But i dont talk down to you like your stupid, i might talk to you like your a homer but theres a difference. You and I both saw SC backup QB last year and I won so many covers just on him alone. Everytimme SC got up 42 they would put in the garbage and give the other teams a chance and they would come back because he is not that good.

My intention is not to talk down to you or give off the impression your stupid. I am just throwing out my opinions. I respect you and your opinions. Just because I may disagree or come across strong with my opinions doesn't mean I think you are stupid. What did I say that offended you?

Norm Chow says you can't evaluate a QB who plays garbage time. Maybe that is why Chow NEVER played the 2nd string QB in garbage time. (I disagree with that) Booty came in and played great at times and turned the ball over bunch of times. But Booty always came in with 2nd string/3rd string offense. Not fair. But Booty playing did give him real live game experience. But in practices both BOOTY and SANCHEZ have looked impressive. Leinart NEVER threw the ball once as a backup QB and lead USC to a NC his 1st year playing. Leinart was very average QB in USC practices until coaches named him the starting QB.

I might be wrong about his future, but justifying SC going undifeated with a completely fresh squad that HAS NOT proven itself outta high school, just because "they doubted Leinhart" and "they doubted Pete Carrol" sounds an awful lot like "just like Oklahoma last year" and if USC 10/1 to win NC sounds good to you then Arkansas at 75/1 must sound 7.5 times as good because its the same garbage bet.

I think with the TALENT and proven coaching staff at USC, 10-1 odds is value. I never said USC will or has great shot at wining a NC. I did say if USC starts 6-0 I am 90% confident they win it all. First 6 games will be tough. After that USC will be a machine.

I might be underestimating SC but I doubt it seriousl, I am probably OVER Estimating their competition in ASU, Cal and Oregon but I stand by a freshman SC squad and their "legendary superhero" band of WR to go 6-6

I can tell you this. 2 weeks after USC lost to Texas USC players were back doing voluntary practices with BOTH Booty and Sanchez leading it. Carroll has let the team know that no job is secure. Open competition. The team is hungry and already competing. Competition in practices leads to success in the season. Carroll #1 philosophy. Competition.

 

[dlvlsu]

Give me a break!! That is a pile of mule dung!! Nothing wrong with loving your school and team but you have a problem!! USC isnt the best school in the world nor the best football program!! Get it thru your head!! You have just shown how ignorant you are!! Legendary this and that geez!! Wewww to funny! Play in a real conference against real football teams then let me here ya talk. pac-10 is a cake walk!

 

[tulah]

Scott,
What worries me is the team continuity & who will step up and be a leader. When losing this massive amount of leadership IE 2 Heisman winners ,it will take time for the new transition to peak. USC had many 2nd half come back W's. Who will be the guy to step up and put the team on his back and carry them if they are losing. It was nice to have Bush , Lienart , White , carry the load.

It's been a great 4yrs but everyone has a rebuilding season. IMO a 3 loss season is likely.The 3 game stretch CAL ,ORE, N.D will be very tough.

If they go 6-0 I beleave they do have a realistic shot at winning another NC.

 

[3 Seconds]

USC easily could have beat TEXAS and their High School Offense. USC lost to Vince Young (who was incredible) and USC beating themselves (which is a fact). USC is the better team but that is why they play the game. Better teams don't always win. Despite USC playing like $hit in 1h, USC still had 12pt 4th quarter lead. Not too shabby!

Your FACTS are trash as is the crap you spew all over this board. HERE IS THEY ONLY FACT :

TEXAS 41 USC 38

USC LOST, TEXAS BEAT THEM.

THE SCOREBOARD DIDNT SAY USC 41 USC 38.

TEXAS BEAT USC THAT IS ALL THE COUNTS.

You & your absolutely moronic comments are a joke. Your spin is sickening & you are becoming an absolutely worthless poster.

IF USC could have easily beat UT why didnt they? I guess they really didnt want to win or else they would have.

Just read my sig, thats all you need to know.

 

[Scott4USC]

IF USC could have easily beat UT why didnt they? I guess they really didnt want to win or else they would have.

1h FACTS

In the 1h Bush gave Texas the ball on an obvious USC scoring drive. In the 1h Leinart threw an INT on an obvious scoring drive. But I gotta give props to Texas on that INT which was simply an incredible INT. Not really Leinarts fault but USC should have pounded White in 1h because Texas had no idea how to stop him. In the 1h Leinart failed to get 4th and inches. Lets not forget that USC should have had Texas 1st and goal from the 10 instead of Texas scoring a TD. This was when USC D WASN'T tired and USC had 7-3 lead. Bad call by refs but that happens.

IMO, if a team does all that, THEY DESERVE TO LOSE! That was why I bet against USC in the 2h. USC looked like $hit in the 1h. USC despite their shortcomings in the 1h built a 12pt lead with like 6min. left in the 4th quarter.

2h FACTS

USC built a 12pt 2h lead late in 4th despite playing like $HIT in the 1h. USC failed to get 4th and 2 and came up an inch short. On Texas winning drive, USC gave Texas a 1st down around 50 with a face mask. Otherwise Texas would have had 4th and 5 around 50. USC also dropped an EASY INT thrown ball by VY on the USC 10 yard line. Young as usual just chucked it to avoid sack and USC DB (who sucks) just knocked it away when it was thrown right at him. Lastly, USC had Texas on 4th and 4 and props to Young for making it.

It is quite obvious USC is the better team who played poorly. A lot of it had NOTHING to do with Texas. Texas didn't play a perfect game either, but Texas was better than USC in covering up their mistakes. Texas was PRETTY LUCKY they recovered (or got back) all their fumbles. USC almost got away with playing poor football and still winning a NC. Just goes to show you you can't play like $hit and beat texas. If USC plays USC football, USC prob. would have won by 17+ pts.

Now your question is answered!

 

[Scott4USC]

Scott,
What worries me is the team continuity & who will step up and be a leader. When losing this massive amount of leadership IE 2 Heisman winners ,it will take time for the new transition to peak. USC had many 2nd half come back W's. Who will be the guy to step up and put the team on his back and carry them if they are losing. It was nice to have Bush , Lienart , White , carry the load.

It's been a great 4yrs but everyone has a rebuilding season. IMO a 3 loss season is likely.The 3 game stretch CAL ,ORE, N.D will be very tough.

If they go 6-0 I beleave they do have a realistic shot at winning another NC.

Great point. Right now USC doesn't have any leaders on the team. ZERO! That is important.

You mention every team needs a year to rebuild etc. Well USC has had to rebuild either their offense or defense in each of the last 4 years under PC. NEVER has USC had both offense and defense set. Next year will be interesting because USC might have their most talented TEAM under PC. I am talking combo of 1st, 2nd and 3rd string players. The recruits PC is bringing in this recruiting class are outstanding. Many will contribute right away. (as usual under PC era)

 

[3 Seconds]

1h FACTS

In the 1h Bush gave Texas the ball on an obvious USC scoring drive. In the 1h Leinart threw an INT on an obvious scoring drive. But I gotta give props to Texas on that INT which was simply an incredible INT. Not really Leinarts fault but USC should have pounded White in 1h because Texas had no idea how to stop him. In the 1h Leinart failed to get 4th and inches. Lets not forget that USC should have had Texas 1st and goal from the 10 instead of Texas scoring a TD. This was when USC D WASN'T tired and USC had 7-3 lead. Bad call by refs but that happens.

IMO, if a team does all that, THEY DESERVE TO LOSE! That was why I bet against USC in the 2h. USC looked like $hit in the 1h. USC despite their shortcomings in the 1h built a 12pt lead with like 6min. left in the 4th quarter.

2h FACTS

USC built a 12pt 2h lead late in 4th despite playing like $HIT in the 1h. USC failed to get 4th and 2 and came up an inch short. On Texas winning drive, USC gave Texas a 1st down around 50 with a face mask. Otherwise Texas would have had 4th and 5 around 50. USC also dropped an EASY INT thrown ball by VY on the USC 10 yard line. Young as usual just chucked it to avoid sack and USC DB (who sucks) just knocked it away when it was thrown right at him. Lastly, USC had Texas on 4th and 4 and props to Young for making it.

It is quite obvious USC is the better team who played poorly. A lot of it had NOTHING to do with Texas. Texas didn't play a perfect game either, but Texas was better than USC in covering up their mistakes. Texas was PRETTY LUCKY they recovered (or got back) all their fumbles. USC almost got away with playing poor football and still winning a NC. Just goes to show you you can't play like $hit and beat texas. If USC plays USC football, USC prob. would have won by 17+ pts.

Now your question is answered!

Perfect example of your spin & flat out lies.

TEXAS DIDNT RECOVER ALL THEIR FUMBLES. You got a gift 7 pts on the fumble on the punt in the 1st Q, which of course your homer spinning chooses to ignore to make your spin seem better. UT getting the ball @ midfileld there they are almost surely put up 7 pts on that pathetic D. 14 pt swing right there.

IF UT had VY in the gun & spread USC out in the first half, like they did in the 2nd half that USC D wouldnt have stopped Texas at all. Texas would have had 60+ EASILY.

They way I see it USC was LUCKY not to lose by 17.

TEXAS WAS THE BETTER TEAM FACT. You can take your OBVIOUS BULLSHIT somewhere else, cause it isnt working here any longer.

YOU ARE A JOKE :s4:

 

[3 Seconds]

ONLY ONE FACT MATTERS:

FACT #1

TEXAS 41 USC 38

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS LONGHORNS REIGNING NATIONAL CHAMPIONS

 

[Scott4USC]

ONLY ONE FACT MATTERS:

FACT #1

TEXAS 41 USC 38

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS LONGHORNS REIGNING NATIONAL CHAMPIONS

I agree! :thumb:

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

 

[Scott4USC]

IF UT had VY in the gun & spread USC out in the first half, like they did in the 2nd half that USC D wouldnt have stopped Texas at all. Texas would have had 60+ EASILY.

VY dominated late 4th because USC D was spent. Mack Brown was smart to go no huddle and wear down USC. USC had no depth at DT. Texas O didn't dominate first 3 quarters of the game. I think Texas went no huddle in the 2q. Right? USC O dominated all 4 quarters. Only problem is USC either ****ed themselves, Texas made great play at crucial time (Leinarts INT), or USC came up "inches" short (Texas deserves credit there as well).

They way I see it USC was LUCKY not to lose by 17.

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

TEXAS WAS THE BETTER TEAM FACT. You can take your OBVIOUS BULLSHIT somewhere else, cause it isnt working here any longer.

Nope. :nooo:

 

[3 Seconds]

Again you fail to admit your flawed spun analysis was wrong & completely ignore the gift 7 for USC & the 7 taken away from UT by the fumbled punt. The fact that UT DIDNT recover all their fumbles. Remember Texas also missed a FG. A FG Pino normally makes. So you can take those 3 pts on as well in your fantasyland spin outcome you create. :s4:

 

[3 Seconds]

Somehow the USC O DOMINATED ALL 4Q & Texas O only played well in the 4th.

POINTS TEXAS 41 USC 38

TOTAL YARDS USC 574 TEXAS 556. WoW you outgained us by 18 yards that is definately the difference between dominated all game & just having success in the 4Q.

FIRST DOWN TEXAS 30 USC 30

Oh yeah its OBVIOUS USC was the superior team. :mj07:

 

[dlvlsu]

Best team always wins numb nuts!! Your an idiot!! Looser!!!

 

[Scott4USC]

Again you fail to admit your flawed spun analysis was wrong & completely ignore the gift 7 for USC & the 7 taken away from UT by the fumbled punt. The fact that UT DIDNT recover all their fumbles.

That was not a gift. USC hit the returner hard and caused the fumble. That is what USC does. I thought USC could/would hit Young hard but they couldn't. (Bush giving Texas the ball is something USC doesn't do and if you do that YOU DESERVE TO LOSE. Texas didn't do ANYTHING to cause that. It was all Bush.)

That is like me saying the LEINART INT was a gift. It wasn't. That Leinart pass is a TD against 95% of teams in the country but the Texas safety made an amazing play and prob. won the game for them right there. But we all knew Texas had great safety so props to him. Plus he was able to not only catch it but keep his feet in bounds. It takes plays like that to have a "chance" to beat USC. Not only that, but USC fawked themselves repeatedly and still could have beat Texas. Amazing USC was able to overcome their sloppy 1h play. Texas should have beat USC by 20+ pts. They couldn't because USC is and was that good. OU played sloppy against USC and they got DRILLED. USC played sloppy against UT and USC still had 12pt 4th quarter lead. AMAZING!

 

[3 Seconds]

That was not a gift. USC hit the returner hard and caused the fumble. That is what USC does. I thought USC could/would hit Young hard but they couldn't. (Bush giving Texas the ball is something USC doesn't do and if you do that YOU DESERVE TO LOSE. Texas didn't do ANYTHING to cause that. It was all Bush.)

That is like me saying the LEINART INT was a gift. It wasn't. That Leinart pass is a TD against 95% of teams in the country but the Texas safety made an amazing play and prob. won the game for them right there. But we all knew Texas had great safety so props to him. Plus he was able to not only catch it but keep his feet in bounds. It takes plays like that to have a "chance" to beat USC. Not only that, but USC fawked themselves repeatedly and still could have beat Texas. Amazing USC was able to overcome their sloppy 1h play. Texas should have beat USC by 20+ pts. They couldn't because USC is and was that good. OU played sloppy against USC and they got DRILLED. USC played sloppy against UT and USC still had 12pt 4th quarter lead. AMAZING!

:bsflag

Of course, I forgot when USC gets turnovers they create them, that is what USC does.

When other teams get turnovers vs USC it was a gift from USC, cause USC doesnt do that.

That was UT first lost fumble of a punt. They dont do that so in your thinkin it was a gift for USC.

Do you hear(read) yourself. My god man you are a freakin comedy show.

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

 

[Scott4USC]

When other teams get turnovers vs USC it was a gift from USC, cause USC doesnt do that.

I apologize. I didn't know Texas played a part in the Bush fumble. My bad. Texas forced it! That is what Texas does! :clap:

 

[3 Seconds]

I apologize. I didn't know Texas played a part in the Bush fumble. My bad. Texas forced it! That is what Texas does! :clap:

Its not UT's fault that BUSH is a bonehead. :banghead:

Maybe your genius coach so teach his players not to make those dumb plays. USC arrogance thinkin they can do whatever they want on the field & win cost them. Not UT's fault.

Way to take one example & try deflect from all the flaws ion your logic.