VT/GT in game...

ivabign

Tosser
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2002
3,492
7
0
Southern California
VT has scored a TD on every possession since the beginning of the 2nd quarter - except for the fumble - and they were goin in for one.... no question.....
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,160
102
63
North Carolina
#45 changed the whole game. Cost them the conference title on one stupid thug of a play.

That guy would never play for me again. If he did its b/c he would have survived a practice he didn't know could exist.

God, the stupidity and selfishness and just thug mentality of a lot of these idiots.

I wish there was an Ivy League down here in the southeast....
 

marcb1oo5

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 23, 2006
3,126
22
0
#45 changed the whole game. Cost them the conference title on one stupid thug of a play.

That guy would never play for me again. If he did its b/c he would have survived a practice he didn't know could exist.

God, the stupidity and selfishness and just thug mentality of a lot of these idiots.

I wish there was an Ivy League down here in the southeast....

genetic
 

RAZ

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 8, 2001
6,137
6
0
GT coaches are fkn pathetic, that bullshit on their own 30 and 45 is a fkn mook and that fuk should get chopped block and cracked back on the same play......
 

ivabign

Tosser
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2002
3,492
7
0
Southern California
After the 1st qtr - GT could not for the life of them, stop the VT offense - the 3rd and 19 was they're only hope - and the idiot wrapped up the game for VT with a bow...

I know! The fix is in!
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,160
102
63
North Carolina
Not sure I've ever seen a dumber personal foul that more than likely was so huge....the way the game was going...I really think it cost GT the conference title. And it wasn't something that just happened late....just a blatant punch after you force 4th and 20.....incredible.

I sort of understand the 4th and 1 but don't agree at all with it. Punt the damn ball.

I do agree with going for 2. I understand the logic but if I'm down 2....I go for 2. If you make it a one point game and no one scores....you lose by 1. If you cut it to 1 and then they score and then you score.....ok, your down 2.

Is there a better chance you get the 2-pt conversion later in the game? I mean, either way it becomes one 2-pt conversion. But I do understand both logics. Maybe they get 2 FG's and your down 7 instead of 8. I don't really blame either as long as its not 4th qtr....then u gotta go for 2.

Man, #45.....piece of trash. BTW, didn't have any money on game.
 

Dragon Fly

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2008
449
6
0
gtech backers domed from the start lang had a 40 dime on gtech including me :facepalm:
 

Corley1011

Hail State!
Forum Member
Dec 13, 2006
11,744
62
48
40
Madison, MS
That one penalty changed the entire game... Instead of GT getting the ball in good field position, VT scores and goes back on top...



You can't handicap shit like that...
 

joefrog91

Rah, Rah, TCU!
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2002
4,402
8
0
57
Waco, TX
That one penalty changed the entire game... Instead of GT getting the ball in good field position, VT scores and goes back on top...



You can't handicap shit like that...

Yep, that and the stupid coach going for it on 4th down in their end of the field.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top