ward churchill fired by university of colorado

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,588
234
63
"the bunker"
a long time coming...


DENVER — "Ward Churchill, the professor who called some of the World Trade Center victims “little Eichmanns,” should be fired because of “repeated and deliberate” infractions of scholarship rules, a University of Colorado committee said today.
The recommendation, which came on a 6-3 vote, now goes to university officials for a final decision.
Churchill, a tenured professor of ethnic studies who has vowed to fight his dismissal with a lawsuit, “has committed serious, repeated, and deliberate research misconduct,” the school’s Standing Committee on Research Misconduct said in its final report.
But in what appeared to be an acknowledgment of the political pressure placed on the university to fire Churchill, the report asked school officials to reassure other faculty members that CU still values academic freedom.
Churchill has repeatedly denied misconduct and he did so again today.
“Baloney. That’s my one-word-response,” he said. “The basic situation here is there was a call ... for my termination clear back last February, whether or not it was legal. They’re willing to take the heat and go to court if necessary and stand behind an illegitimate investigation.”
The school’s investigation focused on allegations that Churchill committed research misconduct and plagiarism. They did not address his comments about the Sept. 11 victims, which came in an essay he wrote hours after the attacks. The essay was largely ignored until January 2005, when they came to light before a scheduled speech at a college in upstate New York.
Since then, his case has been cited by conservatives as an example of how universities have overstocked their faculties with leftists. Others raised concerns that a crackdown on Churchill would set a bad precedent when it comes to academic freedom"...




here`s the chief....


890322007_69cf4abb10_m.jpg


and his student posse....known as "whiteguiltus-moonbatus".....

891165100_25dd5313e9.jpg




what's with the guy in the middle with the ****(rooster) target on his face?.....
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Next the court case. We will see how good our Constitution is.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
Maybe the ACLU/Haskel crowd can define the consitution--

ACLU behind Churchill--but opposed the head of Harvard for his statement about his thinking women were not as adept in math and science as men--:shrug:

Have you not figured out yet DJV that liberals are for freedom of speech--as long as it supports their view
--maybe a replay of the video of the liberal journalism class @ Columbia shouting and throwing chairs at speaker they didn't agree with is in order :)

Liberals actions on freedom speech--a classic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfnn7wTgoE8
 
Last edited:

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
Sounds like he's an incompetent jackass who deserves to lose his job.
 

danmurphy jr

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2004
2,966
5
0
The taxpayers and the State of Colorado have made him a wealthy man. God Bless America!
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Wayne-Pot, Meet Mr. Kettle. Ironic to see a supporter of this administration ridiculing any defining or understanding of what our Constitution stands for. Not to mention using the freedom of speech metaphor when necessary - yeah...that's a REAL party-line problem only liberals have these days...

:mj07: :mj10: :mj07: :mj10: :mj07: :mj10: :mj07:
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
Is that all I get Chad--
That freedom of speech video generally gets the juices flowing :)

Will give you an eqiuvilant on the right--those preaching values getting caught with their pants down/hand in the cookie jar ect

You are correct--it is a 2 way street-no argument here.
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
No taxpayer should be forced to support this dribble. The guy deserved to be fired. Let him go to a private university that will have him.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I don't support him. I can't stand folks like him and
others like. Ann DipChit. But sure as hell there will be a court case. And our Constitution may be his best weapon.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
--another singer example of liberal freedom of speech chior--

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070727/NATION02/107270089

Inside the Beltway
John McCaslin
July 27, 2007
Getting hotter

The head of the Environmental Protection Agency says he will investigate a threatening letter sent by the leader of an EPA-member group, vowing to "destroy" the career of a climate skeptic.

During a Capitol Hill hearing yesterday, Sen. James M. Inhofe, Oklahoma Republican and ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, confronted EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson about the strongly-worded letter written July 13 by Michael T. Eckhart, president of the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) that was sent to Marlo Lewis, senior fellow of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI).

"It is my intention to destroy your career as a liar," Mr. Eckhart wrote. "If you produce one more editorial against climate change, I will launch a campaign against your professional integrity. I will call you a liar and charlatan to the Harvard community of which you and I are members. I will call you out as a man who has been bought by Corporate America. Go ahead, guy. Take me on."

CEI does not dispute climate change, however it differs with certain environmental groups, including ACORE, on the causes. After Mr. Inhofe read Mr. Eckhart's comments, which were first reported by Inside the Beltway two weeks ago, the EPA chief promised to probe the matter.

"Statements like this are of concern to me. I am a believer in cooperation and collaboration across all sectors," Mr. Johnson assured. "This is an area I will look into for the record."

When Mr. Johnson confirmed that EPA is a member of ACORE, Mr. Inhofe asked if "it is appropriate to be a part of an organization that is headed up by a person who makes this statement."

Late yesterday, Mr. Inhofe announced he will send letters to the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, and EPA, urging them to "reconsider their membership of ACORE."
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top