Wrap up for week 9 - Terrible, just terrible.
Oh yeah, easy to post Cruncher/me record for that dang week - 1 and 4 on the regular listing I wrote. I didn't post either of the 2 parlays I played but for the recordkeepers... add 2 mo losahs.
Illinois puts up 10 pts and that's looks about right, but them BADgers can only muster up 24 pts. vs. the absolute worst team by far IMO opinion (after watching them vs. W.Kentucky in week 2) that I've seen this season and I do watch plenty of the "Creme Puff" teams too. Yeah, Illi. looks like they improved since week 2 but thems had to do PLENTY and I mean PLENTY of improving for me to think about not fading thems.
Little did I know that a bigger headache woud follow with Iowa, who was controlling and covering the whole freakin game UNTIL the final minutes and blow the cover. Did that game ever suck? Those two plicks were the only bets that were over 1 unit for me last week too.
I got a feeling that a lot of really good cappers got CREAMED in week 9 cause there really wasn't any rhyme, reason, or logic for the ATS results of so many of the games. It kinda makes ya think that no matter if you studied ALL the games of every week, what crystal ball you used, computer or insider you followed - your chances of coming out ahead is like 40-45%. Less for the weak cappers... . .. . MAYBE, if that does makes a difference ?
The cruncher is designed to find covering favorites and for 2 weeks now it's doing a much better job of finding covering DOGS. That is, the PLICKS should come from the BOTTOM PLAYS of the Cruncher report which means IT'S LOWEST CONFIDENCE FOR THE FAVORITE TO COVER.
Let's try this....
I'm gonna post it's top 4 FAVORITES to cover, just in case it gets back on track for week 10 AND it's 3 DOGS to cover. Three of five of it's bestest DOG plicks covered each week and at least 1 won outright each week . That is, during the past 3 weeks not the whole season.
For me, I check out it's 10 top plays and throw out around 5 of them before playing anything. If enough MJers chime in here and want me to list the 5 that I come up with that I'll definitely be on after doing that part... I'll try to get back and post them. After my record last week - I don't expect anybody to and still can't believe that almost 900 "readers" actually visited my thread. :shrug:
One mo thang
This is just an idea I'm sharing. I like to play at least 2 parlays every week, either 2 or 3 (rarely 4) teamers. For 3 teamers or more, at least ONE of the plicks has to be in a different category. For me that different category of sport is usually either tennis or NFL, or college baskets. no baesebawl for me. I never considered :00011 for finding a plick!
And here's why - well, say your sport is footsball. And you're going for a nice, big, fat, FIVE TEAMER. Now, are your chances better with - say playing FIVE college footsball games or THREE college games along with 2 NFLers on SUNDAY? I really like to take a shot with games falling on different days too but that part isn't as important. I realize that this option may not be available for everybody, but it sure has helped me.
So far I got only one bet going and no single plays for this week yet. I really like to start off the week with a "Mickey Mouse" weekday team. My record ain't that great with these, but it can get you off to a start sometimes. It's...
Pending 3 Team Parlay
Pending 11/5/17 1:00pm NFL Football 452 Philadelphia Eagles -6 -150* vs Denver Broncos
Win 11/2/17 9:15pm College Football 315 Idaho +18? -110* vs Troy
Pending 11/4/17 3:00pm College Football 355 Georgia State -3 -140* vs Georgia Southern
I bought a point on the Eagles and Ga. St.; always take them down on important nos. in parlays. Idaho was only my own play, no Cruncher involved with that one which is why I didn't post it. Just too many pts. for Troy to give to a reasonably decent team like Idaho who's been playing better than one would expect.
G.L., Readers/Visitors/MJers
That's the sermon for this week and I'll add plays when I can.
Oh yeah, easy to post Cruncher/me record for that dang week - 1 and 4 on the regular listing I wrote. I didn't post either of the 2 parlays I played but for the recordkeepers... add 2 mo losahs.
Illinois puts up 10 pts and that's looks about right, but them BADgers can only muster up 24 pts. vs. the absolute worst team by far IMO opinion (after watching them vs. W.Kentucky in week 2) that I've seen this season and I do watch plenty of the "Creme Puff" teams too. Yeah, Illi. looks like they improved since week 2 but thems had to do PLENTY and I mean PLENTY of improving for me to think about not fading thems.
Little did I know that a bigger headache woud follow with Iowa, who was controlling and covering the whole freakin game UNTIL the final minutes and blow the cover. Did that game ever suck? Those two plicks were the only bets that were over 1 unit for me last week too.
I got a feeling that a lot of really good cappers got CREAMED in week 9 cause there really wasn't any rhyme, reason, or logic for the ATS results of so many of the games. It kinda makes ya think that no matter if you studied ALL the games of every week, what crystal ball you used, computer or insider you followed - your chances of coming out ahead is like 40-45%. Less for the weak cappers... . .. . MAYBE, if that does makes a difference ?
The cruncher is designed to find covering favorites and for 2 weeks now it's doing a much better job of finding covering DOGS. That is, the PLICKS should come from the BOTTOM PLAYS of the Cruncher report which means IT'S LOWEST CONFIDENCE FOR THE FAVORITE TO COVER.
Let's try this....
I'm gonna post it's top 4 FAVORITES to cover, just in case it gets back on track for week 10 AND it's 3 DOGS to cover. Three of five of it's bestest DOG plicks covered each week and at least 1 won outright each week . That is, during the past 3 weeks not the whole season.
For me, I check out it's 10 top plays and throw out around 5 of them before playing anything. If enough MJers chime in here and want me to list the 5 that I come up with that I'll definitely be on after doing that part... I'll try to get back and post them. After my record last week - I don't expect anybody to and still can't believe that almost 900 "readers" actually visited my thread. :shrug:
One mo thang
This is just an idea I'm sharing. I like to play at least 2 parlays every week, either 2 or 3 (rarely 4) teamers. For 3 teamers or more, at least ONE of the plicks has to be in a different category. For me that different category of sport is usually either tennis or NFL, or college baskets. no baesebawl for me. I never considered :00011 for finding a plick!
And here's why - well, say your sport is footsball. And you're going for a nice, big, fat, FIVE TEAMER. Now, are your chances better with - say playing FIVE college footsball games or THREE college games along with 2 NFLers on SUNDAY? I really like to take a shot with games falling on different days too but that part isn't as important. I realize that this option may not be available for everybody, but it sure has helped me.
So far I got only one bet going and no single plays for this week yet. I really like to start off the week with a "Mickey Mouse" weekday team. My record ain't that great with these, but it can get you off to a start sometimes. It's...
Pending 3 Team Parlay
Pending 11/5/17 1:00pm NFL Football 452 Philadelphia Eagles -6 -150* vs Denver Broncos
Win 11/2/17 9:15pm College Football 315 Idaho +18? -110* vs Troy
Pending 11/4/17 3:00pm College Football 355 Georgia State -3 -140* vs Georgia Southern
I bought a point on the Eagles and Ga. St.; always take them down on important nos. in parlays. Idaho was only my own play, no Cruncher involved with that one which is why I didn't post it. Just too many pts. for Troy to give to a reasonably decent team like Idaho who's been playing better than one would expect.
G.L., Readers/Visitors/MJers
That's the sermon for this week and I'll add plays when I can.
