Wed games

[gsp]

In all my years of posting at Jack's Kosar is the only person to ever come after me in one of my threads. I've been posting here for 5 or 6 years. I've seen a lot of people both good and bad come and go. I've never seen Kosar put anything constructive anywhere at Jack's. He always has done what he has now done to me twice. Both times he has shown that he is a total idiot and it only took him six years to get up the nerve to do to me what he has done to many others in the past.

Kosar, if you are the person that I heard thru the grapevine you are then I'll be glad to leave Jack's if that's what you want.

Until then, I hope all your plays are winners.

 

[wcb4]

kosar--

do me a favor--lend your opinion when it is asked for--nobody asked you a question, so shut your ****ing mouth

 

[Howie]

Ok Howie, keep on keepin' on, brother! Hard to figure how sportsbooks stay in business.

LMFAO. w/e smartguy. i wanna be just like you when i grow up. plz tell me your secret? plz, plz plz!!! how can i be SO cool...i wanna know, plz, plz, plz!!!

:thefinger :moon:

 

[Gatorbait]

harsh and useful are quite different....don't ya think .....I guess you should be the only one to bash here and get away with it. Just think it could of been said in a much more appropriate manner. :moon:

 

[Spock]

Sorry Gatorbait.

And sorry Spock.


If you guys find this 'angle' to be useful, then have at it.

Kosar:

actually my point was that nothing is achieved or contributed by saying that this angle is good or bad .. if one does not like it .. ignore it .. thats what i was trying to convey ..

Joe: ignore the criticism and carry on the good work.

Thanx
The Friendly Vulcan

 

[kosar]

I've never seen Kosar put anything constructive anywhere at Jack's.

Both times he has shown that he is a total idiot and it only took him six years to get up the nerve to do to me what he has done to many others in the past.

Kosar, if you are the person that I heard thru the grapevine you are then I'll be glad to leave Jack's if that's what you want.

Constructive? Well, start right here. If I steered even one lurker or anybody away from this 'angle', then that's worth it's weight in gold.

Get up the nerve? I don't get it, I guess. I'm also not sure about the 'total idiot' part.

I don't care if you, or anybody, leaves. But come on, man. You can't possibly be serious with this stuff in this thread.

 

[kosar]

Spock, actually something *is* achieved if anybody is steered off something like this. It's really not a matter of ignoring it, seeing as how plenty of people either implicitly or explicitly endorse this craziness.

Every day I do 'ignore' crazy schemes, trends and angles that are proferred here, but this one was utterly and totally ridiculous. Sorry if it bothers you.

Now honestly Spock, what do you think of this 'method'?

Kosar:

actually my point was that nothing is achieved or contributed by saying that this angle is good or bad .. if one does not like it .. ignore it .. thats what i was trying to convey ..

Joe: ignore the criticism and carry on the good work.

 

[Hoops]

Bash kosar all you want, but it's taking away from the point he is trying to make and I've yet to hear a sound, reasonable argument to refute it....what possible correlation (besides random luck) would the result of the first game of the day in the NBA have with the third, last or any game that day? They are totally seperate entities with no correlation what so ever.

 

[djv]

Im lost on this. Has anyone did a search to see how the 2 and 4 games react to each other. Or maybe first and last of the night no matter what number. I guess if games 1 and 3 have something to do with each other a argumnt could be made. But what does one have to do with the other. It just seems far out of makeing and sence. Sorry not trying to be a smart ass. But if this works it had to be just luck. Unless there is some theroy and I would need to read and understand what ever that could possiably me. Or look out as GSP said this can turn off fast. It was just a strange happeing for a while and no one really knows why.

 

[Spock]

Spock, actually something *is* achieved if anybody is steered off something like this. It's really not a matter of ignoring it, seeing as how plenty of people either implicitly or explicitly endorse this craziness.

Every day I do 'ignore' crazy schemes, trends and angles that are proferred here, but this one was utterly and totally ridiculous. Sorry if it bothers you.

Now honestly Spock, what do you think of this 'method'?

Does not bother me personally (No need to apologize because its a personal view and views always/sometimes differ). I just think that everyone here is smart enough to understand if any angle is good or not and whether they shud follow it or not (I may be wrong here). I have not followed any posters pick unless I can agree to it using my own angles. As someone suggested .. mebbe the wording could have been different

I have read Joe's threads before and he does contribute a lot. I personally think he is a sound capper. If this angle has somehow been working .. good for him.

As for what I think - to be honest I would never follow the angle just because that is not one of the ways I use to handicap a game.

*** Regarding caring if joe or anyone else leaves - the whole point of the forum is to share info and picks and beat the bookie. So there has to be some caring.

Cheers and Good luck to ALL
Spock

 

[nighthorse]

kosar's reply probably was a bit harsh, but it was funny

I thought gsp was just throwing that out as an interesting piece of trivia, then people began debating the order of listings. That was a head scratcher. I thought, "am I the only one who finds this a bit odd?"

There's been times when an "angle" like this one would have been better than whatever I tried to do.