Wednesday
- Thread starter Chenker
- Start date
chenker
chenker
Think TB/Fl and Chic/Phoenix are both strong under picks:
Chicago at Phoenix
Under is 4-0-2 in the last six meetings
Hawks last three games have played under
Under is 14-6 when CHI plays after a loss
Under is 5-1 in the Coyotes last six at home
PHX rank 21st in offense with 2.46 goals/gm avg
Offense last 5 games: Chicago 1.6 Phoenix 2.6
Tampa Bay at Florida
Under is 4-2 in the last six meetings
Under is 20-8 in TAM road games this season
Offense last 5 games: TB 1.80 Fl 2.2
TB averages 1.73 goals on the road (4.19 total/game)
1 Day Rest TB games avg 4.57 goals
Divisional games: TB 4.5 /game Fl 5.16/game
Keep in mind I've had great numbers like these and lost. Overall have found that for Over/Unders, prior matchups are best indicators. I do this for all games for totals, think these are the best bets.
Good luck to all
saint
chenker
Think TB/Fl and Chic/Phoenix are both strong under picks:
Chicago at Phoenix
Under is 4-0-2 in the last six meetings
Hawks last three games have played under
Under is 14-6 when CHI plays after a loss
Under is 5-1 in the Coyotes last six at home
PHX rank 21st in offense with 2.46 goals/gm avg
Offense last 5 games: Chicago 1.6 Phoenix 2.6
Tampa Bay at Florida
Under is 4-2 in the last six meetings
Under is 20-8 in TAM road games this season
Offense last 5 games: TB 1.80 Fl 2.2
TB averages 1.73 goals on the road (4.19 total/game)
1 Day Rest TB games avg 4.57 goals
Divisional games: TB 4.5 /game Fl 5.16/game
Keep in mind I've had great numbers like these and lost. Overall have found that for Over/Unders, prior matchups are best indicators. I do this for all games for totals, think these are the best bets.
Good luck to all
saint
Saint like your Tbay/Fla under-
don't like playing the under and a side in same game- so no opinion on Chi/Pho under-
adding one more-
Det/NYR under 6 -115 460/400
might be risky but like the number to be under 6 in this one.
don't like playing the under and a side in same game- so no opinion on Chi/Pho under-
adding one more-
Det/NYR under 6 -115 460/400
might be risky but like the number to be under 6 in this one.
hey chenk,
hey chenk,
I replied to your post in my thread so won't go through it again but thanks fo the input it is appreciated...just so you know I am on the same side of both your sides and like them both. I see your point about not playing two in one game but like I said in my post..if you believe that Chicago is going to win then you have to believe they will hold Pho to 2 goals or less as that is the method they have won almost all of their games as of late. It certainly doesn't sound like a very sound system...but hell it works for me in all sports. for instance if you were on Patriots in Super Bowl why woul you not take the under as they certainly weren't going to line up and outscore the Rams you know. If you think the Knicks are going to win, then think under cuz they will have to do it with defense. just the opposite side of mavericks who will simply outscore you. JMO but it seems to work well for me. Check it out. I dont play alot of totals anyway but that is how I come up with alot of stuff.....stupidly to some...regrettably to others.....so I got that going for me:shrug:
hey chenk,
I replied to your post in my thread so won't go through it again but thanks fo the input it is appreciated...just so you know I am on the same side of both your sides and like them both. I see your point about not playing two in one game but like I said in my post..if you believe that Chicago is going to win then you have to believe they will hold Pho to 2 goals or less as that is the method they have won almost all of their games as of late. It certainly doesn't sound like a very sound system...but hell it works for me in all sports. for instance if you were on Patriots in Super Bowl why woul you not take the under as they certainly weren't going to line up and outscore the Rams you know. If you think the Knicks are going to win, then think under cuz they will have to do it with defense. just the opposite side of mavericks who will simply outscore you. JMO but it seems to work well for me. Check it out. I dont play alot of totals anyway but that is how I come up with alot of stuff.....stupidly to some...regrettably to others.....so I got that going for me:shrug:
chenker,
You are right about the chalk plays. Good job staying with your original 4 plays and not adding another. Take a look on my post about hockey the next week. You might find it interesting.
HORNS
You are right about the chalk plays. Good job staying with your original 4 plays and not adding another. Take a look on my post about hockey the next week. You might find it interesting.
HORNS
