Week 17 nfc north and review

[bleedingpurple]

You're consistently butt hurt about the Packers because in Rodgers' first season: 2008 - they had a losing record and went 6-10 and couldn't win a close game to save their life because #12 didn't have the experience under his belt to pull the wins out of a hat. 2009 - then in his second year as the starter, they turn it around and get a wild card slot, and lose in the first round. 2010 - pull out a wild card spot, and end up winning the super bowl And for the past 3 years they have crushed the NFC North and won the Division, and lost in the Divisional playoffs 2 of the last 3 years. and you're butt hurt over that saying they aren't doing enough? :0002:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm: Sorry it took me a few hours to respond, I was in the ER today. When I read that comment you made about the Vikings should have been a 10 win team this season I fell out of my chair and broke a hip.

so how many wins was Peterson worth? none then? just wondering? that would be like me saying the Packers would have won only one extra game last year had Rodgers not got hurt.

Green Bay won the super bowl and regressed, badly, they have thrown out crappie defenses for years straight and did absolutely nothing to improve it. packed fans can brag about the division wins but when you go to a super bowl the goal shouldn't be to be better than Chicago, Detroit, and Minnesota. every team the last two seasons the Packers played who made the playoffs beat them. it's not like they are the world beaters all the Packer fans like to think, but yeah they get there customary 5-6 wins then go .500 with rest of the league

 

[PocketAces]

Win or lose the Packers are in the tournament again! I'm just hoping for a good game.

Go Pack Go!

 

[bleedingpurple]

Win or lose the Packers are in the tournament again! I'm just hoping for a good game. Go Pack Go!

how many wins was Peterson worth do you think considering Vikes lost a bunch of close games?

 

[PocketAces]

how many wins was Peterson worth do you think considering Vikes lost a bunch of close games?

I was sure glad that GB didn't have to face him. Considering the Vikings could win today they easily would have had 10 wins if Peterson was playing.

I can't image how much better Teddy's stats would have been if teams had to prepare for AP. I really think that they restructure his deal and bring him back next year.

 

[Old School]

I was sure glad that GB didn't have to face him. Considering the Vikings could win today they easily would have had 10 wins if Peterson was playing.

I can't image how much better Teddy's stats would have been if teams had to prepare for AP. I really think that they restructure his deal and bring him back next year.

so ya resign him and lose a first round playoff game next year at best..

or ya trade him and possible play for a Conference Championship in 3 years..

easy answer..he's gotta go now for value..

 

[bleedingpurple]

so ya resign him and lose a first round playoff game next year at best.. or ya trade him and possible play for a Conference Championship in 3 years.. easy answer..he's gotta go now for value..

they aren't going to get squat for him via trade, if they find someone willing to give them a one
or two you take it. if not and he restructures then bring him back

 

[bleedingpurple]

I was sure glad that GB didn't have to face him. Considering the Vikings could win today they easily would have had 10 wins if Peterson was playing. I can't image how much better Teddy's stats would have been if teams had to prepare for AP. I really think that they restructure his deal and bring him back next year.

a packer fan wth sensibility. if minny had ap I believe they would have beat the Bills, Dolphins, lions, and maybe the Packers just my opinion. he was worth 3 extra wins. He makes the offense that much better

 

[pistol495]

Will write it up after fishing


Minny -7 BIG over Bears

This should be a rout

I know you like them in the game but....
Take the blinders off for a moment. If you had MN over the season win total would you hedge? How is this young team going to respond to blowing two consecutive 14-0 leads?
How often does that even happen?

I am leaning no because Chi is coming off similar situation but just trying to think about this objectively

Thanks
Pistol

 

[ticket casher]

B.p good luck today, hope you guys beat Chicago and don't finish in the cellar again.

 

[bleedingpurple]

I know you like them in the game but.... Take the blinders off for a moment. If you had MN over the season win total would you hedge? How is this young team going to respond to blowing two consecutive 14-0 leads? How often does that even happen? I am leaning no because Chi is coming off similar situation but just trying to think about this objectively Thanks Pistol

I picked the Vikings -7 big, I think it's a blowout. I rarely pick the Vikings but I think they come out end finish the season strong

 

[bleedingpurple]

I know you like them in the game but.... Take the blinders off for a moment. If you had MN over the season win total would you hedge? How is this young team going to respond to blowing two consecutive 14-0 leads? How often does that even happen? I am leaning no because Chi is coming off similar situation but just trying to think about this objectively Thanks Pistol

I'm
not hedging is the answer

 

[bleedingpurple]

B.p good luck today, hope you guys beat Chicago and don't finish in the cellar again.

yeah if
you would have told me that #28 would have been suspended, the right side of o line would be out for most the season and Rudolph would miss half season and Vikes probably finish 7-9? fuck you had them at 3-4 wins before the season drafting top 5. So who has the bias?

 

[marine]

so how many wins was Peterson worth? none then? just wondering? that would be like me saying the Packers would have won only one extra game last year had Rodgers not got hurt.

Green Bay won the super bowl and regressed, badly, they have thrown out crappie defenses for years straight and did absolutely nothing to improve it. packed fans can brag about the division wins but when you go to a super bowl the goal shouldn't be to be better than Chicago, Detroit, and Minnesota. every team the last two seasons the Packers played who made the playoffs beat them. it's not like they are the world beaters all the Packer fans like to think, but yeah they get there customary 5-6 wins then go .500 with rest of the league

This is why you are such a tool with your spite towards the packers. Every reason you give about the Vikings being better and on the up and up and how they ride unicorns around the field and fart rainbows at halftime... are the same things you thump your chest about Green Bay being terrible for.
Injuries? Really?
Rodgers goes out for a few game, Matthews goes out for a number of games, they come back and play injured in a playoff game or two, a few other people on the team have injuries that have them hobbling along.. hell, at one point they were grabbing people out of the stands to play running back they were so beat up, and you can't stop screaming about how weak the organization is. But you get a few guys on the Vikings that have to sit a few games and it's "oh dude, they'd be a 10 win team if that didn't happen, we'll get em next year, go team!"

I'm surprised you haven't just told us that the Vikings are 14-2 in moral victories and 16-0 in hypothetical victories yet

 

[pistol495]

I'm
not hedging is the answer

Thanks

 

[ticket casher]

yeah if
you would have told me that #28 would have been suspended, the right side of o line would be out for most the season and Rudolph would miss half season and Vikes probably finish 7-9? fuck you had them at 3-4 wins before the season drafting top 5. So who has the bias?

B.p. you are what your record says you are.
Rodgers missed 9 games last year and g.b still won north.
Injuries happen. Though beating your kid with a tree branch doesn't have too I guess.

 

[bleedingpurple]

B.p. you are what your record says you are. Rodgers missed 9 games last year and g.b still won north. Injuries happen. Though beating your kid with a tree branch doesn't have too I guess.

yeah they won the division but record speaks of the division, it was bad, pack won twice in his absence. 8-7-1 without Rodgers and he won 6 of them so they were 2-5-1 without him. yeah beating your kid should get you suspended but nobody predicts that before the season starts

 

[poolplayer8888]

I pound Green Bay cause they won a Super Bowl with the best qb and youngest roster 4 years ago and have done nothing but regressed. they should not be a 1 and done team. maybe that's all the Paxker fans want is to win a crappy division title and be eliminated by the elite in first round? I would want much more with #12. yeah all they do is win? not on the road and this was the first year in a long time they beat playoff caliber teams but still no road wins and NEVER EVER win as a dog.

u do realize only ONE team can win a SB..it is very hard....manning has ONE...Brady hasn't won any since the cheating scandal.....you act like they should win 5 in 6 year span....be realistic dude...i am about Minny that they will suck ass every year and i'm almost always right on

 

[poolplayer8888]

This is why you are such a tool with your spite towards the packers. Every reason you give about the Vikings being better and on the up and up and how they ride unicorns around the field and fart rainbows at halftime... are the same things you thump your chest about Green Bay being terrible for.
Injuries? Really?
Rodgers goes out for a few game, Matthews goes out for a number of games, they come back and play injured in a playoff game or two, a few other people on the team have injuries that have them hobbling along.. hell, at one point they were grabbing people out of the stands to play running back they were so beat up, and you can't stop screaming about how weak the organization is. But you get a few guys on the Vikings that have to sit a few games and it's "oh dude, they'd be a 10 win team if that didn't happen, we'll get em next year, go team!"

I'm surprised you haven't just told us that the Vikings are 14-2 in moral victories and 16-0 in hypothetical victories yet

Nailed it

 

[bleedingpurple]

This is why you are such a tool with your spite towards the packers. Every reason you give about the Vikings being better and on the up and up and how they ride unicorns around the field and fart rainbows at halftime... are the same things you thump your chest about Green Bay being terrible for. Injuries? Really? Rodgers goes out for a few game, Matthews goes out for a number of games, they come back and play injured in a playoff game or two, a few other people on the team have injuries that have them hobbling along.. hell, at one point they were grabbing people out of the stands to play running back they were so beat up, and you can't stop screaming about how weak the organization is. But you get a few guys on the Vikings that have to sit a few games and it's "oh dude, they'd be a 10 win team if that didn't happen, we'll get em next year, go team!" I'm surprised you haven't just told us that the Vikings are 14-2 in moral victories and 16-0 in hypothetical victories yet

now it's a playoff game or two, it was one. so you are saying The Vikings would not have been a better team with Peterson? um ok.

 

[bleedingpurple]

u do realize only ONE team can win a SB..it is very hard....manning has ONE...Brady hasn't won any since the cheating scandal.....you act like they should win 5 in 6 year span....be realistic dude...i am about Minny that they will suck ass every year and i'm almost always right on

oh without doubt it's tough but fuck they still have AJ Hawk out there, that guy should have been gone long ago just one of the reasons why they should take criticism.