WEEK 17

[LAZK]

As did I. Over or Under on the Packers?

 

[bulldog]

looks like you are buying back the gb under 47 or trying to middle it; are you trying to middle the kc/denver as you had kc for game earlier in week.

 

[jesscolb]

Lol....who the hell knows? Today is like preseason...been a long week

 

[Old School]

BUYING MIAMI BACK NO PLAY

TOTAL ALSO:shrug: :shrug:

 

[LAZK]

So the day I decide to bet all the games early to hopefully be on the same numbers, this happens. My luck.

 

[THUNDER]

now it's pack over - you posted under above?

Sorry ITS UNDER

 

[THUNDER]

BUYING MIAMI BACK NO PLAY

TOTAL ALSO:shrug: :shrug:

NO TOTAL KEEPING JUST BOUGHT BACK MIAMI

 

[THUNDER]

GB UNDER IS MY PLAY

 

[SNOWMAN]

At what % 5 , 4 or 9

 

[THUNDER]

At what % 5 , 4 or 9

WHAT IDIOT

 

[Amethyest]

WHAT IDIOT

he is adding them together :shrug: he just want's to make sure :toast:

 

[THUNDER]

he is adding them together :shrug: he just want's to make sure :toast:

No Not True


But ITS 5%

 

[Amethyest]

No Not True


But ITS 5%

5% is what I went with :toast:

 

[THUNDER]

5% is what I went with :toast:

GLUCK U ARE A GOOD GUY

 

[THUNDER]

SAN FRAN -7 3%


GENVER UNDER 20 4%


SEATLE -6.5 -116 4%

 

[THUNDER]

GB -4 6%



GB OVER 22.5 3% 2H

 

[WayUpInYa]

Good luck!

 

[THUNDER]

NE UNDER 20.5 3% 2H

 

[SNOWMAN]

I was just asking you posted 5% under then 4% over then pulled back the over advising it was suppose to be under , so did not know if it changed from 5 to 4 or you were making it a 9 I was just going off of what you posted.

 

[Amethyest]

I was just asking you posted 5% under then 4% over then pulled back the over advising it was suppose to be under , so did not know if it changed from 5 to 4 or you were making it a 9 I was just going off of what you posted.

already answered :toast: