Just want to give my two cents on Dallas vs. Houston since there is a lot of talk about this game.
First of all, I never bet a team that covered vs. a team that failed to cover in week 2. Just a general principle of teams getting overvalued and undervalued based on a single performance. Also we have the problem of Tennessee coming off a home performance while Dallas played on the road. Now those roles are reversed and in the NFL home field is generally a huge boost.
If you were to have predicted a line for this game before the season, I would think a majority of bettors would have found value in Dallas getting 3 points in their home opener. Now after a single game the entire world is saying that Tennessee on the other side is a virtual lock.
I generally look contrarian if anything when gauging the public, so perhaps I am biased a bit. I am starting to wonder a bit, though, if I didn't miss something in Dallas with what seems like a good home dog this week.
Forgetting all of this and just comparing the teams, the one thing that stands out is Carter. Is he reliable in the least? Certainly he looked terrible last week, but that *is* only one game playing in a hostile environment where he trailed from the time he stepped on the field. When I handicapped this game, I basically tossed Dallas as a possible bet because I don't trust Carter. Generally I think reasoning like that is short sighted but in this case it may very well be justified.
Other than Carter, you could easily argue that Dallas has a good edge. Their defense is very impressive and remember that Philly tore Tennessee a new one in the first half of the week 1 game.
As tempting as it is for me to tack on Dallas as a sixth selection this week, I will pass. For those of you thinking of going with Tennessee, I say be very, very careful. A large percentage of NFL games are decided by 3 points or less and it is awfully hard to cover that on the road at another team's sold out home opener one week after opening your own season at home with a comeback victory. GL.