Week 5 Picks

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Last Week: 7-1 on straight bets, 0-1 on middles, 0-2 on parlays, +3.3 units
Overall: 23-20, +2.0 units

Getting started early this week because there are three games that just jump off the page at me.

Miami -2?-115 - Well it's not quite the battle of the unbeatens that many people expected we'd see this week. Now we've got a situation where one of these two teams will drop two in a row. A few reasons for this pick: 1) The Patriots have been chewed up badly the last two weeks by strong RB's. And Ricky Williams is having one helluva nice season. New England will have to get that run defence in order in a REAL hurry to contend with him; 2) Dolphins are looking extremely tough at home; 3) Pats travel schedule could wear on them. Not just back to back roadies, but Boston -> West Coast -> Boston -> South Florida. Second game of 2 in row on the road is tough enough as it is without having to also deal with that; and 4) I believe the Fins pass defence can handle whatever the Patriots throw at them. The pendulum has swung, NE has gone from unrespected to over-respected. -2? is looking pretty small.

Washington +6. The line has dropped everywhere to +5?, so I will wait on this...hoping it gets driven up again on gameday. What have the Titans done to deserve to be laying almost a TD against anyone? The mystique is over. Used to be nobody but the Titans ever won in Tennessee; now visitors regularly come away with victories. Skins off a bye week, and this is the softest opponent they have seen since Week 1. Washington was stifled by good defence in their defeats...but the Titans defence is looking VERY weak. Give me the Skins!!

NY Giants Pick. Ok, the Cowboys fans probably won't like this....but....here's how I see it. Dallas is probably the #1 public team (probably?? ok, they are without question), and their fans bet a hell of a lot on their team when they are going well. Which is great, because that will keep the line on this game bettable from a NYG perspective. I was shocked to see this at Pick...I had it at NYG -3 or -3?. Looking at Dallas' last game....they barely beat a St Louis team that is a shell of it's former self and played horribly, and didn't have Kurt Warner except for a few plays. A team in complete and total disarray. I don't think the Rams could have played worse, and still it was close...in fact, almost a Rams win. The Giants are good. Not great, but good. Good enough to not lose back-to-back games @ Ariz & Dal. Great bounceback spot for the Giants. I think I've detected a pattern with the Cowboys. They play a bad game, and the media in Dallas gets all uptight. They play a good game and get the critics off their backs. And then they go right back to playing lousy football again. They just seem to do enough to turn down the heat, but then revert to their old ways. The Giants won't let this opportunity go by the boards. Giants roll.

More later in the week....

{editted to fix up a couple statements}
 
Last edited:

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
Great minds ;)

Have also played Miami -2' (Got -107 tho :D ), and also missed Wash +6.

Not sure about the Giants, but looking at the UNDER.
Under in Tenn too....although that's a play I find hard to pull the trigger on :nono:

Good luck to us!

Edit:
Miami 5-1 in October and 6-1 weeks 5-9 last 3 years.

Some people like trends, some don't, but my guess is this one is relavant due to the weather down there :cool:
 
Last edited:

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Hey Mr C,

I don't mind trends as long as they appear to have some basis in logic. IE. A team has a poor record the first four weeks of the year. If the coach hasn't changed, maybe he is doing something wrong getting this team ready for the season. But something like "Team X is 9-0 ATS in Week 8 the last 9 years"...that's the kind of trend I consider to be a statistical fluke. There's no reason why a team would perform highly above expectations on some random week midseason.

Re: My picks. I see Shane Matthews downgraded to questionable this weekend. Without Matthews the Washington bet is a no go. Luckily I haven't put it in yet. Can't bet on Danny Wuerfel, just can't do it!
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
Good luck Greg

Good luck Greg

I like all three of them actually, not sure if I'll pull the trigger on NYG though ... looks like we'll be rooting for several of the same teams Sunday;)
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Thanks Jeff - hope we both have a good weekend.

Note: I've scrapped the play on Washington listed above.

Second note: One of my favorite angles is looking for overlook games. I've scoured the schedule and can't find a single instance where a team may be looking ahead to next week's opponent more than they are concentrating on this week's game. That's pretty unusual.

Adding:

Denver -5?: First off, this breaks my rule of never taking 3? to 6? point favorites. I'll only break this rule when I feel very strongly about a game....and in this case, I do. The Chargers are a talented team, but they're also very young. You had to see this team celebrating last week to appreciate just how unaccustomed they are to being on the winning sideline. Some players were near tears, others on their knees giving prayers of thanks and pointing to the sky. Tomlinson emphatically shouting "We shocked the world, we shocked the world!!!" to anyone who would listen. These guys think they won the Superbowl last week. They're the only 4-0 team in the league and they've just beaten the defending champs. Combine that with a veteran Denver team off an embarassing loss on national TV to a team of scrubs. Big time bounceback situation for both teams. Sure looks like the Broncs could smack the Chargers back to reality.

Atlanta +ML : I see a team (Tampa Bay) that is not really over-confident so much as they may be more just lulled to sleep by how easy things have been. After a season-opening loss, they've picked apart Baltimore, St Louis and Cinci to the tune of 86-21. Given that most people now realize the Rams really AREN'T that good, that's three very weak teams in a row. Nobody has pushed them to be their best for almost a month. Atlanta at 1-2 sure doesn't appear imposing. But the Falcons could easily be 3-0 right now. I believe Atlanta is a pretty good team that maybe hasn't been noticed yet by the masses. Bucs also playing second road game in a row, favored in both....a bet-against situation. New Orleans showed what they can do to the Bucs with a strong passing game, something the Falcons can duplicate I think. Atlanta's been studying this team for two weeks. Falcons should be good and ready for this test. Will play the best moneyline # I can find.

Pitt/New Orleans Over 43: Debated for a long time which side looked better. Finally came to the conclusion that in almost every scenario I saw quite a few points on the board. Maddox should rejuvenate the Steelers, though I think he's a bit mistake-prone too. He's been waiting patiently for his chance and I think he will shine for the most part. Both teams are weak vs the pass. Cleveland couldn't take advantage of the weaknesses other teams exposed in the Steeler D, but I think the Brooks and the Saints can. I can definitely see a back and forth type game here...perhaps a NO defensive TD off an interception. Something tells me this game won't be super-close, and that should help too.

NY Jets +3: Ya know, this is hard to do. It's been well-debated here in the forum that most people think KC should be laying more points than this. And the public consensus is HUGE on KC. Not to mention, KC's scored 90+ pts in 3 games (a bet-against situation), and the Jets have scored less than 30 pts in their last 3 (a bet-on situation). One thing that IS in the Jets favor: They're coming off three games of playing against top-quality (or at least very good) defence, and now they face a completely different type of team...a team that would rather play shootout ball. This may be just what New York needs after being stifled game after game. The only game all year that NY played against poor D was opening day, and they put up 37 @ Buffalo. So the ability to score IS there, somewhere. I really don't know how the Jets D is going to stop this KC offence. But I've got to give this ugly home dog a shot regardless. Public road favorites lose much more often than they win, gotta trust the math. Will probably play the Over too.

Chicago -1? (Monday): Simply put, Chicago is the better team I believe, and will show it here. I had this line pegged at about Chicago -4 before I saw the actual lines. Maybe recent losses to Buff & NO have people a little down on the Bears. But the Packers really haven't done anything this year to deserve this much respect. The fact that they have a winning record merely masks the fact there are some real problems on this team. Ugly, close wins and they've yet to cover the spread despite being 3-1. Also considering the Over fairly strongly at this point, as both teams have some concerns in the secondary. Favre will find a way to put points on the board, but I think Chicago can match them at every position and do enough to get the W.

...maybe more later. Good luck everyone.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Confirming/Already In:

Miami -2?-115
NY Giants Pick
Atlanta ML +100
Chicago -1?

Waiting to put in the rest...either for a better line, or for the reduced juice special tonight @ MPC. :)
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Confirming:

Pitt/No Over 43?
NY Jets +3? -105
Denver -5? -105

Adding:

Phil/Jax Under 42? - I'm surprised I didn't see this one earlier. This is a situation where both teams are facing defences which are far better than anything they have encountered so far this year. Philly has played vs the defences of Tenn, Wash, Dal & Hou. Jax has faced Indy, KC & NYJ. Dallas and Houston are probably the best defensively of those 7 opponents...the other 5 range from below-average to awful. In my opinion this is an extremely strong Under situation.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Adding:

Kansas City 2H -4 -105: In essesnce I'm hedging my full-game bet. Watching this game, it looks to me like the Jets defence is getting winded and KC is coming close to getting their act together. There's also a small middle opportunity here....a KC win by 2 or 3 points and I win both bets. A KC win by 1 and I win one bet, push one bet. Both bets are for only 5% juice which is even nicer. I may be tossing away a winning ticket, but I have a feeling it's more likely I'm bailing myself out of a loss. I think KC is the right side here. Jets are probably one KC TD away from demoralization and collapse, considering it took everything they had to stay this close for this long.

Hopefully I just hit the middle, that would be really nice. :D :D
 

THE HITMAN

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2001
2,899
3
0
HOLLYWOOD, FL
Nice Goin GM...................I did the Dolphins, of ouse & not much else. I middled PHIL / JAX at 3 early in the week. I will middle anything in the pros at 3. One vig was even -105. I had a legitimate shot at it until late. Then did only 2 more games, split them both for lunch money only..........W on with the NYJ / KC over, but blew the JAX / PHIL Under........GL tonite.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Thanks Hitman, and congrats on your day. I really thought I had that middle...it was setup SO well for a 3-pt KC win. Just tie it up with a FG, then take yer chances in OT. But they just had to punch it in for the TD instead. Oh well. At least the 2nd bet saved me. That always feels better than the 1st one winning and the 2nd one losing. Man did scoring ever go crazy at the end of the Philly game too. I thought that Under was in the bag, then whammm.

5-3, up 1.85 units, I will take it. And wouldn't you know it, yet ANOTHER dropped play by me wins. I tell ya, these things are GOLD!! (6-0 on dropped plays this year). Next week I am going to announce all my plays, then drop 'em all!!!! (Then secretly bet them).

Really wish there was something tonight that I liked, but there isn't. :shrug: At least I won't have to listen to Theisman this week. That in itself is almost as good as winning a bet. :)
 
Last edited:

PUHD

PimpsUpHoesDown
Forum Member
Aug 23, 2002
2,142
0
0
Texas
GM, you cant do that, kharma will kick your ass. Tell you what, keep doing, I'll bet the mortgage, and we can split week in week out. That way YOU'RE not the one playing it. Sound cool? Should we lose, I'll need a place to crash though:D
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
Great job Greg, I'm gonna start playing your dropped plays only -- they never lose!
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
:D Probably a wise move Jeff. And PUHD, don't put up the mortgage just yet. I can't wait to drop a whole pile of plays next week.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Already in:
Chicago -1? (placed last Tuesday, crummy line :( )

Adding:
GB/Chi Over 44: Every way I cap this game it comes out to an Over. Chi has totaled 52 or more in 3 of 4 this year. GB has totaled 55 or more in 3 of 4. The two exceptions were GB's game vs Carolina (last week), and Chicago's game @ Atlanta (Week 2). Both those opponents however are teams that play defensive styles for the most part. Both teams put up high totals vs teams that don't have much defence (Minn, Det, Buff, NOx2, etc), and neither team in this game has quality D. So they should both be playing the same type of up-tempo game. Well-documented that both teams have problems in the secondary. Even without injuries neither team is strong in this department. In the past 44 sounded like a pretty high total, but this season NFL games are averaging an astounding 45.5 PPG thus far....and I see no reason why this one should be lower-scoring than average. I rarely stray from 1 unit plays, but I am going 1.5 units on this one.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top