Week 6 for early birds only

Jimboski

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2005
4,499
14
0
Florida
Posting this for MJers that like the early lines and get their plays in well before game day. I know the "experts" believe this is stupid, that is, ya gotta see how the line moves before betting. I'm not so sure about that. My records over several seasons show that I woulda been better off putting in my plays right after the lines went up. One other reason is the LUCK I had with hoss wacin today (actually Tues.) and I got a feeling there was so much of it that it may spillover to footsball. I knew I was in for a good day at the wace twack (online) when in the very first race of the day my stinkin $14 worth of 0.50 CENT trifecta tickets, one of which resulted in a $317 payoff and that was on 50 cents. WOW! And the rest of the day pretty much followed suit, but nothing like the first race. (I usually only play about 4 of the races, NEVER play all the races. :nono: )

Whatever the case is - I got all the stats I need to start the task of doing the no. crunching stuff. Before I post the "early bird" plays and ESP. before anybody thinks of playing along with any of them, I gotta mention a little about what's going on here...

The figures I come up with represents about 75% of how a team becomes a play. The other 25% is important.

F'rinstance:
Week 5 was outstanding and may lead peoples to think that math formulas that took a long time for me to come up with will work 90+%. Forget 90%. IMO, there ain't no (double negative, yikes?) such thing as an assurance that you're gonna be a weaner by just using a calculator or puter.

If I posted ALL the plicks that the cruncher came up with - it wouldn't have come close to the nice results as the teams I posted here. Using the puter's answer to "whose gonna cover this week" for week 5 was 13/9 which is right at about the 60% mark.

What's the other 25% I use? I'm not gonna bore you any more here but, it's mostly my own opinion about the two teams matchup, injuries, QB ratings, and a lot about what I think of each individual team. Watching a lot of the games really helps too.

Ok, nuff of that... I'm about halfway through capping for this week and these plays DON"T COUNT here cause I gotta finish all the games I selected to check out. BTW, there's no way I'm going to go through the calculations for EVERY stinkin game on Saturdays, enough is enough :mj13:. I do select about half of them or a bit more to do the figures on and then check further before actually putting any in.

Ohio -12 vs. Cent. Mich: The puter must hate the Chippewas cause last week's Bestest (BC) was against them. Can't make this one a Best play yet, but the rating was so strong for this team this week that I will be on them without checking further. The play is mostly about the weakness of CM.

Penn St. -14 vs Northwestern: I liked what I've seen from PSt too. Think this one will go in a 2 or 3 team parlay and that means I take it down to -13

Mid. Tenn. ST. -10: Not too excited about this puter plick, may not be posted OR PLAYED. One thing about this play though - I have 3 lists that I refer to sometimes, each one has a few teams in it, (1) IF UNDECIDED, PLAYEM, (2) IF UNDECIDED, fadem, and (3) IF UNDECIDED, DON'T PLAY THE GAME THEY'RE IN! In this case, it's no. 2 asfaras FIU goes.

I'll post the "official MJ forum plicks" in this thread.
 

3 putt pete

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 10, 2015
2,443
56
0
Some of the self proclaimed "experts" are anything but that. It's the smart players that know their shit that take advantage of early bad numbers. The best players get on the right side of a line move early, they don't jump on after the move and lose that point or two.

Good luck
 

yanno

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2001
3,490
119
63
Ontario
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and all your hard work! That's really generous. Good luck! :0008
 

Jimboski

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2005
4,499
14
0
Florida
thanks for your thread boosters AND well wishes

thanks for your thread boosters AND well wishes

Asfaras line moves, there's just too many times that I wish I woulda just accepted the opening line. I guess the line could have moved either way up to the time I was ready to bet because I just assess the line WHEN I'm ready to bet and was just not interested in following it every day. I think I'll just remain a not so smart bettor and continue doing things that SEEMS to work for me. IMO, there's 2 factors that apply to this TOUGH, TOUGH endeavor we are all pursuing , Smart/Dumb and LUCK and without a doubt, it's LUCK that prevails and that doesn't mean that the other factor doesn't count.

College basketball is the best example - I don't know how the BIG bettors survive after watching their games cause WAY MORE OFTEN THAN CHANCE WOULD HAVE IT , their "fortunes" rely on which way the ball is gonna fall off the rim in the last seconds of the contest and it little matters what happened for the prior 98% of the game as far as the ultimate outcome of the game. Some years I take a shot with CBB, small bets, and here's something funny (and maybe not so smart) - I usually just watched the LAST 2 or 3 mins. of the games. Really,:mj07:

Posting plicks and reading a few of the other threads is a fun thing to do; going through the hours of trying to figure the games out is something I'm gonna do anyway. Helping others like myself, IF I CAN, achieve their objectives against almost insurmountable odds is a good thing. I believe sharing ideas may be even better than sharing picks. I recently retired and I cannot believe how GREAT it feels when EVERY day is a Saturday.You know, get up/go to bed whenever you want :bed:, relax at ANY time of day :0028, stuff like dat.

BUT, I'm not a loyal poster, that is, I may disappear at any time or skip a week now and then if I get worn out by all the nos. in my head :dizzy: I also put a lot of time in with the nags. :s5:
and pretty soon I'll be doing plenty of fishing down here.

images


Sheesh! I plan on writing a few sentences and wind up writing a novel; sorry bout this.

I got the "official PLICKS" for this week and will follow up with them within hours.

Thanks again, 3 putt pete and Yanno and Good Luck whatever you play.
 

Jimboski

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2005
4,499
14
0
Florida
Week 6 for everybody

Week 6 for everybody

Top two plicks got rated extremely close for Bestest Bet honors.

Kentucky -10: BEST BET for this week.

Wisc.-11 : Almost a tossup with Kentucky for top play.

Penn St. - 14 1/2: Goes in a two teamer at -14 for me.

Marshall - 15

Ohio -12


Mini-dog upsets
Pitt Panthers @+150
Fla. St @ +125: I may not put this one in at -125, ripoff.

Good Luck, yawl.
 

Jimboski

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2005
4,499
14
0
Florida
Adding an O/U play

Adding an O/U play

The OVERS/UNDERS aren't addressed with the No. Cruncher. The no. cruncher takes care of the obvious, but important, stuff like how each team focuses on offensive (rush or pass) vs. their opponent's applicable defences, then pts./attempt of each factor, and lot more of the stats related things. No need to go over that here cause the puter does a better job of it than copying nos. or reasons here relating to "Whose gonna cover?".

Whenever the Cruncher sez a team is playable, I check out things that the puter doesn't - like injuries, weather, and what I noted if I watched their previous games. Came up with reasons for going the UNDER route:

-"Newbie" V.Tech QB, Jackson, appears to be an accurate passer, BUT he's also interception prone if the 3 he made in their prev. game indicates anything. I think two of them came after they spent a lot of time gaining ground which results in chewing up the clock.

- In their last contest which was as recent as mid-Sept last year, BC scored a whopping ZERO pts.

- BC focuses on their ground game and that uses up clock time as well

- VT allowed only 115 yds. rushing yds., TOTAL, for the season so far AND... their last opponent was Clemson! :eek:

There were some more things to add, not as important, like the last 4 times these teams faced each other the highest no. O/U was 40 pts, this Sat. it's 45 1/2.

Virg. Tech/BC --> Gimme the UNDER 46


Also like -- UNDER Miami/Fla. St.

One more thing... . . I was leaning on one other UNDER play for the Fla. St. game and SURE ENOUGH, line was 48 when it opened. Dang thang is now 46 and I think it may be crossing the line against me, SHEEEET! I'm gonna check it again and see what I do.
There may be something learned here that I'd like to share. That is, it was Tues. when the line was at 48 and I knew that rain was probable for the weekend...

:00x33 Hah HAh, and now it's a LOT MORE PROBABLE.
 
Last edited:

Jimboski

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2005
4,499
14
0
Florida
Parlays anybody?

Parlays anybody?

Don't ever remember seeing so many closely matched teams playing each other as this week's NFL games.

I only play 3 or 4 parlays. Starting with this one:

3 teamer (bought 2 pts. for the Miami game and 1 pt. for the Giants game)
10/8/2017 1:00 PM NFL Football 451 Los Angeles Chargers/New York Giants* Under 46 -130
10/7/2017 12:30 PM College Football 337 Pittsburgh U* +150 vs Syracuse
10/7/2017 3:30 PM College Football 417 Miami Florida/Florida State* Under 48 -150

EDITING this to just add my other parlay:

Pending 10/7/17 3:30pm College Football 396 Florida -2 -110* vs LSU
Pending 10/7/17 7:30pm College Football 402 Kentucky -9? -110* vs Missouri
Pending 10/7/17 3:30pm College Football 417 Miami Florida/Florida State Under 45? -110*
Win 10/6/17 7:00pm College Football 307 Memphis 2nd Half -6 -153* vs Connecticut

Enjoy them footsballers today, MJers
 
Last edited:

Jimboski

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2005
4,499
14
0
Florida
My record for this week?

My record for this week?

TOO COMPLICATED for me to figure with a couple of winning UNDERs, a close to break even result for the combination of the BBB, that would be the Best Bet Blunder (Ky.) and the two teamer I put in with Wisc. (sooo close to being the best bet) that went with one of the UNDER weaners. Both "mini-dog" money liners were loosahs and that just complicates matter further. :mj16:

Prob. the best way to record how I did was a MINUS 2 (same as 2 loosahs) for the BEST BET thingy (Ky.) and a + 1 1/2 winnah for the Wisc. win. Other way would be to simplify the whole shabang ignoring the parlays and UNDERS and make it 2/3 per my reg. straight plicks.

For REAL (for me that is, the record is>"How did the bankaroo do?) and the answer for that is gonna depend on the last pending bet I got going for this weekend:

Pending 2 Team Parlay
Pending 10/8/17 1:00pm NFL Football 451 Los Angeles Chargers/New York Giants Under 46? -130*
Win 10/7/17 7:30pm College Football 401 Missouri 2nd Half Over 12? -110* vs Kentucky

See that second part of the 2 teamer; despite it looking like Ky. was gonna cover early in their game, I knew that a Ky. cover would have the greatest effect on the bankaroo for this weekend ESP. :0071 if they did cover, so I needed that half-time bet to offset to the damage it coulda done to my potential profits. I needed a decent sized bet amount and adding the best I could come up with an NFLer was added to it to cushion the bet size.

BOTTOM LINE is - that 2 teamer cashes and I actually come out a little ahead, if it loses and the bank goes down by something like 5 to10%. What a freaking "joke" this is - hours and hours studying the college dudes and it comes down to strong HUNCH about an NFLer. :chairshot

I gotta see how the No. Cruncher did with all of it's Sat. picks; last week was 13/9 and I think it may have come out just a bit less this week. Doesn't seem to be much interest, so IF anybody is interested chime in here otherwise ...

I'll probably be back next week. Good luck with them NFLers today.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top