Week 7 Picks

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Last Week: 5-3, +1.9 units
Overall: 34-27, +6.15 units
All Plays are for 1 unit unless stated otherwise.

Two plays so far:

Houston +9: Ok, on the surface, playing Houston on the road is a little scary. But what on earth are the Cleveland Browns doing being 9-point favorites against anyone? Were it not for Holcomb's injury, Tim Couch would be benched by now. Browns return home for the first game since Couch cried in the locker room over his treatment by the Cleveland fans. And those same Cleveland fans are going to be all over him in an instant if the Browns don't completely dominate this expansion team. One little slip-up, first score by Houston, whatever, and the fans are going to get REALLY surly and impatient. From a Houston point of view, Dom Capers will use whatever positives he can to encourage his young team. They stayed close with Buffalo for the whole game last week, winning most of it. That was a confidence-building performance, even in defeat. Houston has had trouble protecting David Carr (sacked 31 times in 5 games), but Cleveland has done an abysmal job of getting to the QB (no sacks in the last 3 games...and 30th ranked defence against the rush). Houston has played some pretty decent opposition in recent weeks, and Cleveland is a step down.

Minnesota / NY Jets Over 48: I am sure this will be a large public play, but I'm not going to let that deter me. This total will climb. Both teams have brutal defences, similar to the Det/Minn matchup last week. Jets have been shut down numerous times this year, but only by good defences (NE, Mia, Jax). Against weaker D's like Buff and KC the Jets have put up 37 (OT) and 25 points respectively. Jets have yet to allow fewer than 28 points in any game, Minny has not allowed fewer than 21. I don't see any reason why the defence should kick in here...neither team is going to go into this game trying to win it with defence.

Good luck everyone.

More later....
 
Last edited:

bej0101

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2001
11,407
2
38
Uranus
like the over in the jets game but would have to take clec. if i bet that game..houston is horrible on the road!
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Well true, Hou did get spanked @ SD, but the Chargers have a great defence. Hou did not look TOO bad @ Philly...again, another elite team...and they covered (+20! LOL). Those are the only two road games they've played, and Cleveland is not nearly the quality of those two teams.
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
Also in Philli....

Also in Philli....

14 of those 18 points (the margin) came from 2 'unusual' (for want of a better word) plays: The 57 yard 'trick' TD by Mitchell and the last TD where Thrash turned a 10 yard pass into a 37 yard score.
Houston also kept Philli to 100 yards rushing....Cleveland are 3rd last av. only 78.5 yards per game.
9 points does seem excessive.
 

Dizzayton

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
1,747
6
0
Minn/jets over is the best play of the week in my opinion. The public will be all over it, but who cares? The public was all over the raiders/bills over two weeks ago and I thought that was the best play that week. I can't figure out the line, and you know what, I'm not gonna even think about it I'm just gonna play it.
This one has shoot out written all over it.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
Re: Week 7 Picks

GM said:
Last Week: 5-3, +1.9 units
Overall: 34-27, +6.15 units

Houston +9: Ok, on the surface, playing Houston on the road is a little scary. But what on earth are the Cleveland Browns doing being 9-point favorites against anyone?

Browns return home for the first game since Couch cried in the locker room over his treatment by the Cleveland fans. And those same Cleveland fans are going to be all over him in an instant if the Browns don't completely dominate this expansion team. One little slip-up, first score by Houston, whatever, and the fans are going to get REALLY surly and impatient.

Houston has played some pretty decent opposition in recent weeks, and Cleveland is a step down.

Thanks for posting your record. Its very professional.

Really like this play GM. Logical and alot of good points why Houston will win. Is there enough of a edge to play it ? I would have to agree. The fans are really going to be on Couch and it very likely will affect his play.

I remember when my brother was 5 and he was having to get on the school bus to go to school for the first time. He was crying his eyes out yelling ....I DONT WANT TO GO TO SCHOOL!!!!!! WAAAAAAAA!!

So my mom in front of the whole bus stop dragged my brother down the street to the bus stop, kicking and screaming and put his ass on the bus. I was only 4 and was watching out a upstairs window. I remember thinking to myself ....GEEZZZZ SCHOOL MUST REALLY SUCK !

The fans are really going to be on Couch and it very likely will affect his play. He is probably at home right now telling his wife-

I dont want to go Sunday !!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

Come on Timmy ....Get on the bus . Your fate is sealed.

I may get on this for a few units. It seems like the edge is there.
I hope this aint the public play. This is the sharp play right GM ?


Scott-Atlanta
 
Last edited:

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Re: Re: Week 7 Picks

Re: Re: Week 7 Picks

Scott-Atlanta said:
I hope this aint the public play. This is the sharp play right GM ?

Hi Scott,

:D :D :D I liked the bus story.

I guess it's the sharp side...the line has moved down to 8? at many books today. Early money usually indicates sharp side, but not always. I'm really not sure what the public will think. :confused: I'd be inclined to think they'd dislike both sides since the public doesn't usually like bad teams. Sharp and public side can be the same side sometimes.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
Re: Re: Re: Week 7 Picks

Re: Re: Re: Week 7 Picks

GM said:


Hi Scott,

:D :D :D I liked the bus story.

I guess it's the sharp side...the line has moved down to 8? at many books today. Early money usually indicates sharp side, but not always. I'm really not sure what the public will think.

Sharp and public side can be the same side sometimes.


I dont believe that the sharp side can ever be on the public side. We only associate the sharp side with the winner. I have never heard anyone say.....oh the public and the sharp side won. The public is almost always said to be too stupid to be on the sharp side. Its confusing.

The only way I have really heard the sharp side recognized correctly is when people say........oh the Cowboys won so that was the sharp side. No that was the f........winning play.

We have to know what the public will think. The public dont have half the knowledge we have access to and look how hard this shit is for us to cap.......THIS SUCKS SOMETIMES !


Scott-Atlanta


Scott-Atlanta
 
Last edited:

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Scott,

But the sharp side is not always the winning side....far from it! If the sharps are right 55% of the time and the public is right 50% of the time, just because the "public" side comes in doesn't mean the sharps screwed up. With percentages like that the sharps will be wrong plenty of times....but they are still smarter than the general public overall. One win doesn't prove anything.

The reason I say I am not sure which side is the sharp side is because early line movement is not always an indicator of which side the sharps are truly on. IE. they may hit a favorite that is at -7 up to -7? or -8, only to move the line higher so they can slam the dog side (the side they really like) harder later in the week at a more favorable number, with a lot more money. I think that's why we're seeing a lot more of these -3 -120 type of lines. Books are sick of getting middled and are just going to adjust the moneyline rather than risk getting smoked by sharps manipulating their lines.

Also, if the sharps win 55% and the public wins 50%....that means 5% of the time both are winning...so the sharp side and the public side must be the same side, sometimes. :)
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Adding:

Arizona -3 -120: Taking another shot on one of the least-spectacular teams in the league. Nothing flashy or exciting about the Cards. They're 3-2 and nobody's seemed to notice, but they appear to be slowly improving. Defence has been keeping them in games recently, and the Cowboys offence hasn't exactly been lighting it up. It only gets tougher here for Dallas. The Cards have shown they can beat mediocre teams, and I don't think I'd even classify Dallas as mediocre. Can Arizona really win three in a row? I think so.

Dallas / Arizona Under 36?: This looks just a bit high. Dallas has only one game totalling Over 38 all year (when Philly ripped 'em badly in Week 3). Arizona has not had a game go Over 38 since Week 1. Of course, the total is 36?, not 38. :) But I would say the chances of at least one team being held to 14 points or fewer are very good...and that should be enough to make this a winner.

More in a bit...
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Adding:

Philly -3 -110: Lots of people on Tampa Bay this week, maybe it's the hook, I don't know. I bought this down off -3?+105. A friend of mine showed me a couple years ago to look for situations like this, where a team plays one type of team for 3-4 weeks in a row, and then plays an opposite type. In this case, TB's defensive stats have been grossly skewed (I think) by playing against some of the worst offences in the league. Cinci, Atlanta (Vick injured during game) and Cleveland in the past three games do not prepare the Bucs well for what awaits them in Philadelphia. The only time this year Tampa has faced a good QB, they allowed 26 pts @ home to New Orleans. Bucs traditionally have trouble here anyways, and now face a Philly team off a bye, proceeded by a 3-point road loss @ Jax. Eagles responded last time they lost a game by whipping the Redskins by 30. Lots of time for Philly to ponder why they are only 3-2, and I really don't see them losing too many times at home this year, or letting this opportunity slip by. The step-up in opposition is just huge for TB here and I think they will be hard-pressed to compete after fattening up against such weak teams.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Thanks no all. :)

Adding:

Washington +7? -105: Pick based mostly on the fact the smart money seems to be on the 'Skins, and the public is on Green Bay. Pack do not usually cover large spreads very well, often just doing enough to win. Also could be a potential letdown spot for GB after a big MNF win and a win over the SB champs. This game kinda pales in comparison. Just hoping Wash can come up with some sort of defence. They should be able to exploit GB's weaknesses on D.

***********

(Footnote, for those who may be interested, not football related) : I qualified 8th today in my GT warmup tourney, about what I expected. That's the good news. Bad news is that a very good player (the young fearless punk I referred to in my earlier message) had a rough day...hungover or something...and he qualified 9th. I'd pegged him for no lower than 2nd, but I guess it's a case of him knowing he would qualify and not really caring where he was seeded. 8th plays 9th in the first round, so I have one hell of a hard opening match. :( This guy will be alert when it really matters today, though if he is ever going to lose, it would probably be first thing in the morning. If I DO somehow pull off the big upset, I am lined up to play the #1 seed (more than likely) in my next match. Crappy draw!!! :mad:

My line on the first match:
Me +260
Him -300

Anyone want some action? :)

Gonna be tough missing a day of NFL football and not being able to bet halftimes or anything.

Good luck everyone.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Golden Tee Golf. (Video golf in other words). Ya ya, I know, it's a video game. We prefer to call it a "video sport". :) Warmup tourney for the Canadian championships in 2 weeks. Prizes for this one aren't anything special...but in 2 weeks there is some nice coin to be made + a trip to the World Championships in Orlando will be on the line. Anyways, it's a good chance to see how my game measures up against the best in the country, and see if I think I can make Team Canada. I'll sure find out in a hurry tomorrow, couldn't have tougher opening opponents than the guys I got!
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,599
245
63
"the bunker"
gl gm

gl gm

took philly and bought the half,the skins and 7.5,but took the cowboys and bought the half to 4....arizona is a very unreliable home favorite(in my humble opinion)......very seldom do this but took a teaser with jags +11.5,cowboys +12.5 and philly+ 5.5(was looking at kc,but the qb situation is to unstable).....g.l. tomorrow.
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
Thanks gardenweasel, gl to you too.

I know what you mean about Arizona. And I do get the feeling asking them to win 3 in a row might be pushing it a bit. Wouldn't say it's the strongest of my picks, but I always bet 'em all the same amount whether I like 'em a little or a lot. I could be wrong, but I think Ariz may be on the upswing a bit and this is a team they should beat now.

Jags line does not look right to me. I've been riding Jax & New Orleans almost all year long but decided that this week it was time to hop off them. Both games to me look like obvious plays and something just smells fishy to me.
 

THE HITMAN

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2001
2,899
3
0
HOLLYWOOD, FL
GL ,GM.........as a note to the Wash play, I dont think the fave has covered in any of GB games this year.........THE HITMAN
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
123
Toronto, ON, Canada
2-3-1 yesterday, ho hum.

Adding:

Indy/Pitt Over 46?: Even against mediocre offences, Indy has been giving up quite a few pts this year. Pitt offence seems to be rejuvenated with Maddox at QB and I'm confident the Steelers will be able to score. Still waiting to see if Pitt's D has learned how to defend the pass. They've showed some very big deficiencies in this department. Against teams with strong QB's (NE, Oak, NO) Pitt has given up 30+ pts every time. Indy, of course, has a strong passing game. Expecting a wide-open game with a number of long gains in both directions.

Was also leaning towards Indy +4?, but decided against it. So if you want to consider that to be a dropped pick, you know what to do.... :cool:

Good luck.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top