===*===
2025 NFL: 58-63-2 +694.60 (latest, wk7: 18-7 +1070.36)
--straight: 20-14-2 [sides: 17-14-1 (fave:12-12-1, dog:5-2) totals: 1-0-1 (ov:x-y, un:1-0-1) tt 1-0-0 (over:1-0) player props: 1-0]
--teasers: 29-25 [6, 6.5 & 7pts: 10-15, T3/10: 13-7, T4/13: 6-3]
--parlays: 9-24
===*===
Last week was rather enjoyable as I couldn't miss a teaser if my life depended on it. Well, hit 8 of 9 anyways, missing only 1 leg of 25. Parlays were also solid as some late defensive stops saved me all over. Hit Mahomes yards prop--counted in straights--but nowhere to be found on other 6 player props I uncovered as I was buried on 5 of 6, fortunately just killing 2 smaller parlays. Panthers -105 moneyline counted as fave, as I figure it's only true dog if you're getting points OR have a moneyline at +100 or better; sorta arbitrary. Stats need oversight.
Changed my tunes and now sitting here undecided whether or not to share some messy notes. Speaking of stats need oversight, the following info is not proprietary information so I'll post it--messy, as mentioned. Was first look at week and includes each team's record, points scored for & against, strength of schedule ranking, opponent passer rating, and 3 rather questionable predictive power ranking spreads. I added in the 3 points for home field to the ppr spreads which we could argue about another time; e.g. on TNF the first predictor actually ranks the Vikings better while the other 2 both favored the Chargers, as shown by the latter 2 being above the +3 given. If I use those going forward then I should refer to them as Totally Unreliable Spread Handicaps, or TUSH 1,2, and 3.
==========(record;for-against(sos)OPR +if improving last 3, -if worse last 3)TUSH1/2/3*
*giving flat +3 for home field
thurs 8:15 vikings(3-3;145-125(26)101.0-)@Chargers(4-3;151-163(19)79.8- ) LAC-0.8/-5.2/-4.8
-Wentz 7-0 TNF?!(cbs pod); Joe Alt prob.return
---
sun 1pm:
jets(0-7;129-183(25)106.5)Bengals(3-4;136-214(8)101.6-)Cin-5.8/-3.9/-4.4
-Chance Rain
49ers(5-2;145-138(12)101.2)@Texans(2-4;127-88(4)68.3+)Hou-6.6/-5/-6.1
bears(4-2;152-155(22)96.3+)@Ravens(1-5;144-194(1)108.4-)Balt-4.1/-6.5/-5.9
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
dolphins(1-6;140-205(28)113.9+)@Falcons(3-3;110-120(9)75.1)Atl-9.3/-6.1/-8.6
-Slight Chance Rain Showers(RETRACTABLE ROOF);Penix bone bruise;BIJAN ROBINSON props
bills(4-2;167-137(31)92.2)@Panthers-QBout?ADalton backup(4-3;145-152(30)87.1-)buff-3.8/-3.8/-4.9
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
giants(2-5;153-177(10)87.6)@Eagles(5-2;170-165(2)80.1)Phil-11.0/-5.7/-10.8
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
browns(2-5;113-152(18)94.3+)@Patriots(5-2;181-133(32)102.0)NE-9.3/-8.8/-7.5
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
---
4:05 buccaneers(5-2;174-175(3)98.3)@Saints(1-6;125-186(21)104.7+)tb-7.7/-5.6/-4.1
4:25 titans(1-6;96-192(11)101.3-)@Colts(6-1;232-140(29)88.4)Ind-16.4/-16.1/-13.2
4:25 cowboys(3-3-1;222-206(15)110.6+)@Broncos(5-2;163-127(27)82.8)Den-4.8/-3.4/-3.5
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
---
8:20 packers(4-1-1;158-125(14)93.2-)@Steelers(4-2;150-140(24)92.0)gb-1/-0.6/pk
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
---
mon 8:15 commanders-QBout?(3-4;180-170(20)105.0)@Chiefs(4-3;186-124(13)91.0-)KC-8.8/-8.5/-8.8
---byes:Raiders,Jaguars,Lions,Rams,Cardinals,Seahawks
==========
I've got a gaggle of plays in already but I'm going to submit this as it is ugly as sin and temptation to edit may overwhelm; first choice is that scoring for and against, which would be much easier to consider if on a per game basis; next, I should have kept my hands off the TUSH and left them neutral but, again, home field should be worth something in almost every case--travel alone, for visitor--not to mention I figured this mess would be mine alone.
2025 NFL: 58-63-2 +694.60 (latest, wk7: 18-7 +1070.36)
--straight: 20-14-2 [sides: 17-14-1 (fave:12-12-1, dog:5-2) totals: 1-0-1 (ov:x-y, un:1-0-1) tt 1-0-0 (over:1-0) player props: 1-0]
--teasers: 29-25 [6, 6.5 & 7pts: 10-15, T3/10: 13-7, T4/13: 6-3]
--parlays: 9-24
===*===
Last week was rather enjoyable as I couldn't miss a teaser if my life depended on it. Well, hit 8 of 9 anyways, missing only 1 leg of 25. Parlays were also solid as some late defensive stops saved me all over. Hit Mahomes yards prop--counted in straights--but nowhere to be found on other 6 player props I uncovered as I was buried on 5 of 6, fortunately just killing 2 smaller parlays. Panthers -105 moneyline counted as fave, as I figure it's only true dog if you're getting points OR have a moneyline at +100 or better; sorta arbitrary. Stats need oversight.
Changed my tunes and now sitting here undecided whether or not to share some messy notes. Speaking of stats need oversight, the following info is not proprietary information so I'll post it--messy, as mentioned. Was first look at week and includes each team's record, points scored for & against, strength of schedule ranking, opponent passer rating, and 3 rather questionable predictive power ranking spreads. I added in the 3 points for home field to the ppr spreads which we could argue about another time; e.g. on TNF the first predictor actually ranks the Vikings better while the other 2 both favored the Chargers, as shown by the latter 2 being above the +3 given. If I use those going forward then I should refer to them as Totally Unreliable Spread Handicaps, or TUSH 1,2, and 3.
==========(record;for-against(sos)OPR +if improving last 3, -if worse last 3)TUSH1/2/3*
*giving flat +3 for home field
thurs 8:15 vikings(3-3;145-125(26)101.0-)@Chargers(4-3;151-163(19)79.8- ) LAC-0.8/-5.2/-4.8
-Wentz 7-0 TNF?!(cbs pod); Joe Alt prob.return
---
sun 1pm:
jets(0-7;129-183(25)106.5)Bengals(3-4;136-214(8)101.6-)Cin-5.8/-3.9/-4.4
-Chance Rain
49ers(5-2;145-138(12)101.2)@Texans(2-4;127-88(4)68.3+)Hou-6.6/-5/-6.1
bears(4-2;152-155(22)96.3+)@Ravens(1-5;144-194(1)108.4-)Balt-4.1/-6.5/-5.9
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
dolphins(1-6;140-205(28)113.9+)@Falcons(3-3;110-120(9)75.1)Atl-9.3/-6.1/-8.6
-Slight Chance Rain Showers(RETRACTABLE ROOF);Penix bone bruise;BIJAN ROBINSON props
bills(4-2;167-137(31)92.2)@Panthers-QBout?ADalton backup(4-3;145-152(30)87.1-)buff-3.8/-3.8/-4.9
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
giants(2-5;153-177(10)87.6)@Eagles(5-2;170-165(2)80.1)Phil-11.0/-5.7/-10.8
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
browns(2-5;113-152(18)94.3+)@Patriots(5-2;181-133(32)102.0)NE-9.3/-8.8/-7.5
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
---
4:05 buccaneers(5-2;174-175(3)98.3)@Saints(1-6;125-186(21)104.7+)tb-7.7/-5.6/-4.1
4:25 titans(1-6;96-192(11)101.3-)@Colts(6-1;232-140(29)88.4)Ind-16.4/-16.1/-13.2
4:25 cowboys(3-3-1;222-206(15)110.6+)@Broncos(5-2;163-127(27)82.8)Den-4.8/-3.4/-3.5
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
---
8:20 packers(4-1-1;158-125(14)93.2-)@Steelers(4-2;150-140(24)92.0)gb-1/-0.6/pk
-Slight Chance Rain Showers
---
mon 8:15 commanders-QBout?(3-4;180-170(20)105.0)@Chiefs(4-3;186-124(13)91.0-)KC-8.8/-8.5/-8.8
---byes:Raiders,Jaguars,Lions,Rams,Cardinals,Seahawks
==========
I've got a gaggle of plays in already but I'm going to submit this as it is ugly as sin and temptation to edit may overwhelm; first choice is that scoring for and against, which would be much easier to consider if on a per game basis; next, I should have kept my hands off the TUSH and left them neutral but, again, home field should be worth something in almost every case--travel alone, for visitor--not to mention I figured this mess would be mine alone.
Last edited:


