TORONTO-VIGILANTE said:this section will be called: betting against teams that suck ATS this year....
i think anything around the record of 1 - 4 ATS constitutes a team that is consistently BAD this season.
1) SMU +24 -105 (1/2 unit)
boise laying -24 on the road.....?? in an inter WAC game???
don't think so.:nono:
boise st beat idaho by about 14 points on the road.....i'll assume here that idaho is NOT better than SMU in respect to the conferences that they're in. A WAC team should be stronger than a sunbelt team, right? I see Boise winning by atleast 17 here.
I'm not familiar with Boise St. but be cautious!
TORONTO-VIGILANTE said:THURSDAY GAME:
2) UL Lafayette +9.5 -109 (1/2 unit)
we've got an 0 - 4 road team favoured by -9.5 points....?
interesting. Good thing about these sunbelt teams is that other than the MEAN GREEN, all the other teams seem to be equally matched....
DR STRANGELOVE said:best of luck Chris!
see you thursday???
TORONTO-VIGILANTE said:THURSDAY GAME:
2) UL Lafayette +9.5 -109 (1/2 unit)
we've got an 0 - 4 road team favoured by -9.5 points....?
interesting. Good thing about these sunbelt teams is that other than the MEAN GREEN, all the other teams seem to be equally matched....
TORONTO-VIGILANTE said:THURSDAY GAME:
2) UL Lafayette +9.5 -109 (1/2 unit)
we've got an 0 - 4 road team favoured by -9.5 points....?
interesting. Good thing about these sunbelt teams is that other than the MEAN GREEN, all the other teams seem to be equally matched....
TORONTO-VIGILANTE said:THURSDAY GAME:
2) UL Lafayette +9.5 -109 (1/2 unit)
we've got an 0 - 4 road team favoured by -9.5 points....?
interesting. Good thing about these sunbelt teams is that other than the MEAN GREEN, all the other teams seem to be equally matched....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.