What a disaster. Now the killing is in the Greenzone

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
How can you trust anyone in this country?

Bombing at Iraqi Parliament Kills 8
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writer
1 hour ago

BAGHDAD - A suicide bomber blew himself up in the Iraqi parliament cafeteria Thursday, killing at least eight people _ including three lawmakers _ and wounding dozens in a stunning assault in the heart of the heavily fortified, U.S.-protected Green Zone.

A news video camera captured the moment of the blast: a flash and an orange ball of fire causing a startled parliament member who was being interviewed to duck, and then the smoky, dust-filled aftermath of confusion and shouting. The video was shot by Alhurra, a U.S. government-funded Arab-language channel.

The blast came hours after a suicide truck bomb exploded on a major bridge in Baghdad, collapsing the steel structure and sending cars tumbling into the Tigris River, police and witnesses said. At least 10 people were killed.

The parliament bombing was believed to be the deadliest attack in the Green Zone, the enclave that houses Iraq's leadership as well as the U.S. Embassy, and is secured by American and Iraqi checkpoints.

Security officials at parliament, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information, said they believed the bomber was a bodyguard of a Sunni member of parliament who was not among the dead. They would not name the member of parliament.

The officials also said two satchel bombs were found near the cafeteria. A U.S. bomb squad took the explosives away and detonated them without incident.

President Bush strongly condemned the attack, saying: "My message to the Iraqi government is `We stand with you.'"

Maj. Gen. William Caldwell told The Associated Press that eight people were killed in the attack, which witness accounts indicated was carried out by a suicide bomber.

Iraqi officials said the bomber struck the cafeteria while several lawmakers were eating lunch, and at least three of them _ two Sunnis and a Shiite _ were killed. State television said 30 people were wounded.

"We don't know at this point who it was. We do know in the past that suicide vests have been used predominantly by al-Qaida," Caldwell said.

Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh suggested that those behind the attack might work in the building.

"There are some groups that work in politics during the day and do things other than politics at night," he told Alhurra.

The Alhurra video showed the blast, with startled lawmaker Jalaluddin al-Saghir, who is also a Muslim imam, ducking for cover. It then showed the immediate aftermath: People screamed for help in a smoky hallway, with one man was slumped over, covered in dust, motionless. A woman kneeled over what appeared to be a wounded or dead man near a table. The camera then focused on a bloody, severed leg.

TV cameras and videotapes belonging to a crew sending footage to Western networks were confiscated and apparently handed over to U.S. authorities.

After the blast, security guards sealed the building and no one _ including lawmakers _ was allowed to enter or leave.

A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad said no Americans were hurt.

The bombing came amid the two-month-old security crackdown in Baghdad, which has sought to restore stability in the capital so that the government of Iraq can take key political steps by June 30 or face a withdrawal of American support.

"We know that there is a security problem in Baghdad," added Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, speaking at the State Department. "This is still early in the process and I don't think anyone expected that there wouldn't be counter-efforts by terrorists to undermine the security presence."

One of the dead lawmakers was Mohammed Awad, a member of the Sunni National Dialogue Front, said party leader Saleh al-Mutlaq. A female Sunni lawmaker from the same list was wounded, he said.

Another was Taha al-Liheibi, of the Sunni Accordance Front, said Mohammed Abu Bakr, who heads the legislature's media department.

A third dead legislator was Niamah al-Mayahi, a member of the Shiite United Iraqi Alliance bloc, said Saleh al-Aujaili, a fellow member.

Abu Bakr and other lawmakers said they saw the suspected bomber's body amid the ghastly scene.

"I saw two legs in the middle of the cafeteria and none of those killed or wounded lost their legs _ which means they must be the legs of the suicide attacker," he said.

Earlier in the day, security officials used dogs to check people entering the building in a rare precaution _ apparently concerned that an attack might take place.

A security scanner for pedestrians at the entrance to the Green Zone near the parliament building was not working Thursday, Abu Bakr said. People were searched only by hand and had to pass through metal detectors, he said.

The brazen bombing was the clearest evidence yet that militants can penetrate even the most secure locations. Masses of U.S. and Iraqi soldiers are on the streets in the ninth week of a security crackdown in the capital and security measures inside the Green Zone have been significantly hardened.

The U.S. military reported April 1 that two suicide vests were found in the Green Zone, also home to the U.S. Embassy and the Iraqi government. A rocket attack last month killed two Americans, a soldier and a contractor. A few days earlier, a rocket landed within 100 yards of a building where U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was holding a news conference. No one was hurt.

Khalaf al-Ilyan, one of the three leaders of the Iraqi Accordance Front, which holds 44 seats, said the attack was "aimed at everyone _ all parties _ our parliament in general being a symbol and a representative of all segments of Iraqi society."

Al-Ilyan, who is in Jordan recovering from knee surgery, said the blast also "underlines the failure of the government's security plan."

"The plan is 100 percent a failure. It's a complete flop. The explosion means that instability and lack of security has reached the Green Zone, which the government boasts is heavily fortified," he said.

Hadi al-Amiri, head of the parliament's security and defense committee, said the blast shook the building just after legislators ended their main meeting, and broke into smaller committees.

"A few brothers (fellow lawmakers) happened to be in the cafeteria at the time of the explosion," al-Amiri told Al-Arabiya television. "But had they been able to place this bomb inside the meeting hall, it would have been a catastrophe."

Al-Amiri said Iraqi forces are in charge of security in the building, and that explosives could have been smuggled in amid restaurant supplies.

Attacks in the Green Zone are rare. The worst previous known assault occurred Oct. 14, 2004, when a blast at a market and a popular cafe killed six people _ the first bombing in the sprawling region.

On Nov. 25, 2004, a mortar attack inside the zone killed four employees of a British security firm and wounded at least 12. On Jan. 29, 2005, insurgents hit the U.S. Embassy compound with a rocket, killing two Americans _ a civilian and a sailor _ on the eve of landmark elections. Four other Americans were wounded.

In addition to killing 10 people, Thursday's bombing of the al-Sarafiya bridge wounded 26, hospital officials said, and police were trying to rescue as many as 20 people whose cars plummeted off the span.

Waves lapped against twisted girders as patrol boats searched for survivors and U.S. helicopters flew overhead. Scuba divers donned flippers and waded in from the riverbanks.

Farhan al-Sudani, a 34-year-old Shiite businessman who lives near the bridge, said the blast woke him at dawn.

"A huge explosion shook our house and I thought it would demolish our house. Me and my wife jumped immediately from our bed, grabbed our three kids and took them outside," he said.

The al-Sarafiya bridge connected two northern Baghdad neighborhoods _ Waziriyah, a mostly Sunni enclave, and Utafiyah, a Shiite area.

Police blamed the attack on a suicide truck bomber. AP Television News video showed the bridge broken in two places _ perhaps the result of two blasts.

The al-Sarafiya bridge is believed to be at least 75 years old, built by the British in the early part of the 20th century.

"It is one of Baghdad's monuments. This is really damaging for Iraq. We are losing a lot of our history every day," said Ahmed Abdul-Karim, who lives nearby.

The al-Sarafiya bridge has a duplicate in Fallujah that was built later and made infamous in March 2004 when angry mobs hung the charred bodies of U.S. contractors from its girders.

The destroyed span "is linked to Baghdad's modern history _ it is one of our famous monuments," said Haider Ghazala, a 52-year-old Iraqi architect.

"Attacking this bridge affects the morale of Iraqis and especially Baghdad residents who feel proud of this bridge. They (insurgents) want to demolish everything that connects the people with this land," he said.

Before the bridge was destroyed, nine spans over the Tigris linked western and eastern Baghdad.

The river now serves as a de facto dividing line between the mostly Shiite east and the largely Sunni west of the city, a reality of more than a year of sectarian fighting that has forced Sunnis to flee neighborhoods where they were a minority and likewise for Shiites.

Baghdad's neighborhoods had been very mixed before the war but hundreds of thousands of people have been displaced since then as militants from both Muslim sects have sought to cleanse their neighborhoods of rivals.

There have been unconfirmed reports for months that Sunni insurgents and al-Qaida in Iraq were planning a campaign to blow up the bridges.

Also Thursday, the U.S. military said its troops killed two suspected insurgents and captured 17 in raids across the country.

___
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
But, I thought it was safer now in Baghdad with the curfew extension and all...:rolleyes:

Chad this really is becoming a no win situation. It really is sad. Those poor Iraq's have been living in war so long it would be nice to see them get a break. What kind of life is that?
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Chad this really is becoming a no win situation. It really is sad. Those poor Iraq's have been living in war so long it would be nice to see them get a break. What kind of life is that?
According to McCain and Briam Williams it is pretty good there.:shrug:
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
Don't worry about the endless mass of people willing to blow themselves up for what they see as a religious cause worth dying for. What we need is 20,000 more troups and everything will be fine.

The insane stupidity of this "conflict" gets more and more tragic everyday.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Don't worry about the endless mass of people willing to blow themselves up for what they see as a religious cause worth dying for. What we need is 20,000 more troups and everything will be fine.

The insane stupidity of this "conflict" gets more and more tragic everyday.

And to me Jab it had nothing to do about WMD's, nothing to do with the Iraq's getting freedom and it had everything to do about cold hard cash and all for a precious few. These toops are nothing but pawns for a rich guys game. Over there spilling there guts and muscle because of a bunch of dispicable people.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
And to me Jab it had nothing to do about WMD's, nothing to do with the Iraq's getting freedom and it had everything to do about cold hard cash and all for a precious few. These toops are nothing but pawns for a rich guys game. Over there spilling there guts and muscle because of a bunch of dispicable people.
The worse it gets for us the better it is for Halliburten. No bid, open ended contract.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,578
227
63
"the bunker"
:director: "HEY FREEZE!!!!...THIS IS WHERE THE MOONBATS WENT"!!!!

with the tone of this thread and all the mutual jerking off going on,i thought i`d stumbled into "the association of gay muslims.com" (mecca chapter).....

now fellas,get those heads back in the sand......

(get em good `n riled up for the weekend;) )
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
:director: "HEY FREEZE!!!!...THIS IS WHERE THE MOONBATS WENT"!!!!

with the tone of this thread and all the mutual jerking off going on,i thought i`d stumbled into "the association of gay muslims.com" (mecca chapter).....

now fellas,get those heads back in the sand......

(get em good `n riled up for the weekend;) )

Weasel, non of us are happy about what is happening in Iraq. That is why we want to stop it. It does nothing to prove your argument that all of these deaths are worth the projected goal.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,578
227
63
"the bunker"
stevie...bubby....the rest of you guys.......

it`s upsetting for some of us when "you people"(lol) take such relish in the success of enemy attacks(and it`s upsetting to me that spongy seems to be mimicking his hero,spytheweb)...

your reaction is the very objective that our enemy seeks....but, i know that you guys are smart enough to understand that...and that`s a bit disconcerting...

the sad truth is, the ONLY thing that motivates and animates the modern left/progressive/ democrat party is their hatred for one man....george w bush.....

i know it`s just wishful thinking on my part to expect modern democrats to have spines, morals, common sense, respect, common objectives, love of country....i know thats far fetched...

none of this is surprising coming from a large part the entitlement generation.....everything has been handed to them, so the "path of least resistance" is the only one they know... they have never had to work or struggle to achieve anything worth having.....it`s just there...


that`s why i try and keep in mind the fact that nearly half of this country was on the wrong side of the debate that started the civil war....many wanted no part of ww2....... and 1/3 of this country actually were literally loyal to george III...

and we still muddled through....:mj09:

so, the fact that there are a bunch of traitors in our government and media.... and lemmings that blindly follow them, doesn`t really come as a surprise....

iunfortunately,it looks like it`s gonna take at least one more big hit.....the moonbat guano`s gonna have to hit the ventilator for real before "some people" wake up.....


have a nice day:sadwave:
 
Last edited:

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
the sad truth is, the ONLY thing that motivates and animates the modern left/progressive/ democrat party is their hatred for one man....george w bush.....

After about the 50th time you've made this ignorant comment, I guess i'll finally respond.

NOBODY 'hated' W when he became president in 2000. Certainly nobody hated him after 9/11 or after we went to Afghanistan.

Hate is a strong word, but I believe people, including many, many prominent Republicans/conservatives(sic) became a little disillusioned after the port thing, immigration non-reform and very most importantly the Iraq abortion.

I don't sense any big W 'hatred' sentiment sweeping the country, from the democrats or anybody else.

People are rightfully concerned about some serious missteps that will affect this country for many years. Period.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
you're kidding, right ?

to this date many people (including many on this forum) think that george bush & his cronies stole that election.

Hatred? Maybe we're just splitting hairs here, I don't know. Yes, some ignorant people still think the Supreme Court and/or Katherine Harris stole that election, but even after that was all settled, I never saw any widespread, palpable, irrational 'hatred' towards the man.

I still don't see it, but there are definitely plenty of people who have jumped ship, if you will.

Of course, as always, people on the fringe (including some here) come up with some crazy shit to pin on W. I don't think that equals some big fireball of national hatred that clouds peoples minds, as weasel CONTINUALLY suggests.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,496
172
63
Bowling Green Ky
The point is--same media--same blogs-same posters--can't wait to post anything that is negative on war--if that isn't relishing I don't know what is.

--Trust me --you can find very negative aspects of ever war--and more severe ones in korean and both world wars.

Fathom for a moment if you will the impact modern day fannypackers would have on those in Korean war that died from by thousands from the elements--or give them a day on civilian casuaties of hiroshima ect.

It would be a liberals utopia to have been around back then--and what the germans-japanese and N Koreans wouldn't have given for their support--
Think about it---
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
The fact that most Americans now realize the tragic futility of the current occupation of Iraq and some Americans did not want to enter into WW2 makes the two "conflicts" analogous in the twisted mind of gw. Solid reasoning. One has nothing to do with the other gw and their is no comparison. What is your expected result from all of this? Keep the US military deployed in Iraq until the last suicide bomber blows themself up? What idiotic lunacy. Hatred for Bush has nothing to do with most Americans wanting an end to this horribly misguided endeavor. As for supporting king George you have to be kidding. GW at the forefront of the revolution? Thats a joke, right? You would have most certainly been the biggest "loyalist" around ranting about the moonbat traitors. You really need to find Allah. You would be much happier in a totalitarian state where you could rant about the infidels and be with people of similar mind.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
The point is--same media--same blogs-same posters--can't wait to post anything that is negative on war--if that isn't relishing I don't know what is.

--Trust me --you can find very negative aspects of ever war--and more severe ones in korean and both world wars.

Fathom for a moment if you will the impact modern day fannypackers would have on those in Korean war that died from by thousands from the elements--or give them a day on civilian casuaties of hiroshima ect.

It would be a liberals utopia to have been around back then--and what the germans-japanese and N Koreans wouldn't have given for their support--
Think about it---


No dog it exposes liars (People trying to bullshit people into thinking its safe over there) and fools (people who constantly use neocon talking points because they have no thoughts of their own)
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Wow. Weasel, you have really touched a nerve this time. The nerve was tweaked further by Wayne's incessant media/liberal mini-rant. I'm going to spend the rest of the afternoon trying to relax in nice spring weather, checking out some skin for the first time in I don't know how long around here, and loading up on alcohol.

Expect a drunken multi-layered attack on both of your B.S. (or is it B.S.'s?) later tonight. I can only imagine how frustrated you guys must be, sitting in a paint-surrounded corner, nearly all alone (with Freeze posting so infrequently these days), with nobody having the "sense" to agree with you anymore.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Yes, I do hate George W Bush. I do think he stole the election in 2000 and also in 2004. I also stood behind him after 911 and applauded when he threw out the first pitch at that baseball game. I was proud when he went to ground Zero. I stood behind him when bombed Afghanastan. I hated him again when he went into Iraq for no real reason. I hate him more for prolonging the occupation. I am willing to bet there are a bunch of guys on here who hate Clinton for taxes. What iis the point? :shrug:
 

danmurphy jr

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2004
2,966
5
0
Bush and Cheney would not honor an age old tradition to throw out the first pitch at Major League baseball parks because they feared getting booed out of their underwear, to say nothing of being impossible to protect.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top