They turn on Fox News, look around for prying ears, and silently start repeating the "N" word under their breath. This is eventually what spills out when they start talking aloud.
I'm always amazed that people like this can even long into a forum. The country was in the toilet when Bush left office and now things are going pretty well. How in the fuck do you draw that conclusion unless you're completely clueless?
They turn on Fox News, look around for prying ears, and silently start repeating the "N" word under their breath. This is eventually what spills out when they start talking aloud.
I'm always amazed that people like this can even long into a forum. The country was in the toilet when Bush left office and now things are going pretty well. How in the fuck do you draw that conclusion unless you're completely clueless?
I'm always amazed that people like this can even long into a forum. The country was in the toilet when Bush left office and now things are going pretty well. How in the fuck do you draw that conclusion unless you're completely clueless?
I'm always amazed that people like this can even long into a forum. The country was in the toilet when Bush left office and now things are going pretty well. How in the fuck do you draw that conclusion unless you're completely clueless?
Of what dumbass?
keep sippin on them colt 45's... :facepalm:...
Bush did a better job than Obama
keep sippin on them colt 45's... :facepalm:...
Bush did a better job than Obama
I'm always amazed that people like this can even long into a forum. The country was in the toilet when Bush left office and now things are going pretty well. How in the fuck do you draw that conclusion unless you're completely clueless?
Of what dumbass?
I think Hammer is spot on with this bet.
Dependency is way up and labor force participation is way down. In fact, dependency is the fastest growing sector of the economy. We have increased the number of people on SNAP (what used to be called food stamps) by 16 million, the number on Social Security disability by 1.5 million (a 20 percent increase), and increased the number of people on Medicaid by 9 million even before the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare (we are still trying to count up those new government dependents; the new total should be about 12 million more people on Medicaid). The more people who are dependent on the government, the better. Obamacare is building on that model. Now millions more people rely at least partially on the government to pay for their health care. Are those people ever going to vote for a smaller (Republican) government? I don?t think so. We used to just be able to scare seniors into voting for us by telling them that Republicans wanted to cut their Social Security, but now we have over 160 million people getting some kind of government check. That is over half the country (about 52 percent) and means there is a potential majority of voters we can bribe into voting our way by promising them bigger benefits.
You cant make this shit up.
:facepalm:
CORRECT JAXX THIS IS ADVICE ON A BET AN INVESTMENT WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL PUTTING WAGERING ADVICE IN THE POLITICAL FORUM WD BE MORONIC... NOW ???? YOU HAVE ANY THING MORE TO SAY IE ..JACK OR WHOVER MNOVED THIS
What a bullshit post. You're so full of shit. Hey name the last Republican president in 50 years that reduced the deficit in their term? I'll give you a hint..... that's right, none! Not a fucking one. You have zero support for this crock of shit post but if you keep saying it, it must be true right? 57% approval rate and climbing bitch. To bad you're on the wrong side again as usual.I think Hammer is spot on with this bet.
Dependency is way up and labor force participation is way down. In fact, dependency is the fastest growing sector of the economy. We have increased the number of people on SNAP (what used to be called food stamps) by 16 million, the number on Social Security disability by 1.5 million (a 20 percent increase), and increased the number of people on Medicaid by 9 million even before the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare (we are still trying to count up those new government dependents; the new total should be about 12 million more people on Medicaid). The more people who are dependent on the government, the better. Obamacare is building on that model. Now millions more people rely at least partially on the government to pay for their health care. Are those people ever going to vote for a smaller (Republican) government? I don?t think so. We used to just be able to scare seniors into voting for us by telling them that Republicans wanted to cut their Social Security, but now we have over 160 million people getting some kind of government check. That is over half the country (about 52 percent) and means there is a potential majority of voters we can bribe into voting our way by promising them bigger benefits.
You cant make this shit up.
:facepalm:
Once again skul, as I've stated numerous times, I don't watch it. EverMSNBC
:shrug:
BET THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL WIN THE NEXT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION...THERE ISNT A REPUBLICAN OUT THERE THAT ISN'T A MORON ASSHOLE.........AMERICA DOES NOT NEED MORE MORON A HOLES ..ALSO THE DEMOGRAPHIC OF THE COUNTRY IS CHANGING SO THAT A REPULICAN IDIOT CAN NEVER AGAIN WIN THE WHITE HOUSE
AND THAT'S A HAMMERLOCK !!!!!
keep sippin on them colt 45's... :facepalm:...
Bush did a better job than Obama
Once again skul, as I've stated numerous times, I don't watch it. Ever
That is correct with Fox viewers being the most consistently misinformed of all. Pity really.Watching Fox and MSNBC have been studied by universities and with no surprise the people who watch them are less informed than the average person.
keep sippin on them colt 45's... :facepalm:...
Bush did a better job than Obama
I think Hammer is spot on with this bet.
Dependency is way up and labor force participation is way down. In fact, dependency is the fastest growing sector of the economy. We have increased the number of people on SNAP (what used to be called food stamps) by 16 million, the number on Social Security disability by 1.5 million (a 20 percent increase), and increased the number of people on Medicaid by 9 million even before the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare (we are still trying to count up those new government dependents; the new total should be about 12 million more people on Medicaid). The more people who are dependent on the government, the better. Obamacare is building on that model. Now millions more people rely at least partially on the government to pay for their health care. Are those people ever going to vote for a smaller (Republican) government? I don?t think so. We used to just be able to scare seniors into voting for us by telling them that Republicans wanted to cut their Social Security, but now we have over 160 million people getting some kind of government check. That is over half the country (about 52 percent) and means there is a potential majority of voters we can bribe into voting our way by promising them bigger benefits.
You cant make this shit up.
:facepalm:
CORRECT JAXX THIS IS ADVICE ON A BET AN INVESTMENT WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL PUTTING WAGERING ADVICE IN THE POLITICAL FORUM WD BE MORONIC... NOW ???? YOU HAVE ANY THING MORE TO SAY IE ..JACK OR WHOVER MNOVED THIS
I guess the numbers are correct. Consistently misinformed and clueless. Pity really.That is correct with Fox viewers being the most consistently misinformed of all. Pity really.
Way better job, it's not even close
Add in Obama's executive action of temporary deportation amnesty with the issuing driver?s licenses and Social Security numbers to the illegal immigrants and its a freaking lock Hammer. Hussien is the master at transforming this country. The idiot republicans just stand by and let it happen.
Unreal
:facepalm:
I guess the numbers are correct. Consistently misinformed and clueless. Pity really.
Hope that helps,
FDC
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
