Where is CartersCubs at?

the addict

BI-WINNING
Forum Member
Oct 9, 2009
13,034
116
0
39
PA proud
everyone knows this:

if you are going to the ground with the football you have to retain possession through the catch.
&
there were missed calls that the colts would have benefited from

unless its at the goalline...as soon as the ball crosses the goalline with possesion it counts and play is over.....he had possesion and crossed the line refs got it right...
 

CartersCubs

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 2, 2008
1,586
4
0
Indiana
unless its at the goalline...as soon as the ball crosses the goalline with possesion it counts and play is over.....he had possesion and crossed the line refs got it right...

explain how you bobble a football, then retain possession, then lose it in less than a second and it counts as a catch?

YOU MUST RETAIN POSSESSION THROUGH THE CATCH FOR IT TO BE A COMPLETION.
 

the addict

BI-WINNING
Forum Member
Oct 9, 2009
13,034
116
0
39
PA proud
explain how you bobble a football, then retain possession, then lose it in less than a second and it counts as a catch?

YOU MUST RETAIN POSSESSION THROUGH THE CATCH FOR IT TO BE A COMPLETION.

I dont have to explain it, the refs already did last night
 

jr11

08-18-05
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
5,830
29
0
113
HELL
ya they were wrong.

Ok, so NO would have won 29-17 instead. Either way, Indy still needed a TD. Whether you or anyone thought that was the incorrect call, it didn't have any impact on the game or why Indy didn't win, it was a 2 point conversion.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
i wear a brackett jersey thank you very much.

as far as the game went the refs were all for the saints.
that 2 pt conversion was not a catch.
the saints were never called for pass interference.

great job saints on ur victory but it wasn't a legit game.

come play the full strength colts (freeney and sanders) against unbiased refs.

o and also try and play us straight up. don't do all of that on-side kick stuff. classless

You know I haven't paid attention to any of your posts until now. I got curious. All these posts calling you out. This post alone makes you look like a big pussy.

It was a catch.

Blaming the refs?

On side kick was classless? Maybe you should have been prepared for it?

Okay thats enough from me. I'm sure there are plenty others that want to call you a pussy too.
 

Tdog72

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 28, 2007
495
0
0
53
Ottawa Canada
Pure possession, pure catch, maintained possession ONTO the ground UNTIL INDY play ran into his arms and ball fell loose.....PLANE was crossed, had possession........CATCH, 2 PTS, PICK 6 SUPERBOWL

WHOOP IT!!!!

See ya next year!!!!
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
this is a moot point

this is a moot point

<TABLE class=tborder id=post2569724 cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px"><TABLE cellSpacing=6 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD noWrap>CartersCubs
user_online.gif
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2569724", true); </SCRIPT>
Registered User
</TD><TD width="100%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top noWrap>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- / user info --></TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2569724><!-- message, attachments, sig --><!-- message -->Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by the addict
unless its at the goalline...as soon as the ball crosses the goalline with possesion it counts and play is over.....he had possesion and crossed the line refs got it right...
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

explain how you bobble a football, then retain possession, then lose it in less than a second and it counts as a catch?

YOU MUST RETAIN POSSESSION THROUGH THE CATCH FOR IT TO BE A COMPLETION.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

...but i'll argue cuz in this case its right. exactly--EXACTLY as the addict said here. When crossing the goal line--so long as the carrier had possesion while it crossed--it counts.

lemme put this in terms you may understand better. say...Joseph Addai was running to the pilon and reached out with two hands grasping the ball (identical to how lance moore was holding--and "having possesion" of the ball) once THE BALL -in possession of carrier, same case in either example--crosses the plane of the goal line, the play is over--as the score has been made, line to reach gained. if then say vilma were to come by and rip the ball out of Addai's hands and run 100+ yds the other way, it wouldnt count because the play was dead once the goal line was crossed. you're only argument is--"he didnt have possesion" but honestly, that was pretty clear he did

4341261298_05a7e1f3aa.jpg


2 points for the 2 pointer!
not only did he 1, cross the plane with possesion, 2 his shin/knee was down (which is enough to be ruled down) in the endzone while the ball was across the goal line with him having CLEAR possession of. yes he does bobble the ball--but well after he possessed the ball while accross the goal line. 2 points!

not taking anything away from Manning, as he had two fantastic throws--one to garcon in the ez, 1st TD--and later in fourth when touched it over 4+ defenders to dallas clark

tell me, was the sun in manning's eyes when he threw the pick 6? D coord called for pressure which hurried QB's throw and DB knowing hadto be quick throw jumped the route--no blame on refs there...unless.... no, wait--wayne coulda caught that TD on fourth down. deflected through his hands to the ground incomplete. ALL REFs there....:shrug:
 
Last edited:

Pound4Pound#1

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2008
2,949
16
38
New England
<TABLE class=tborder id=post2569724 cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px"><TABLE cellSpacing=6 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD noWrap>CartersCubs
user_online.gif
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2569724", true); </SCRIPT>
Registered User
</TD><TD width="100%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top noWrap>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- / user info --></TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2569724><!-- message, attachments, sig --><!-- message -->Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by the addict
unless its at the goalline...as soon as the ball crosses the goalline with possesion it counts and play is over.....he had possesion and crossed the line refs got it right...
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

explain how you bobble a football, then retain possession, then lose it in less than a second and it counts as a catch?

YOU MUST RETAIN POSSESSION THROUGH THE CATCH FOR IT TO BE A COMPLETION.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

...but i'll argue cuz in this case its right. exactly--EXACTLY as the addict said here. When crossing the goal line--so long as the carrier had possesion while it crossed--it counts.

lemme put this in terms you may understand better. say...Joseph Addai was running to the pilon and reached out with two hands grasping the ball (identical to how lance moore was holding--and "having possesion" of the ball) once THE BALL -in possession of carrier, same case in either example--crosses the plane of the goal line, the play is over--as the score has been made, line to reach gained. if then say vilma were to come by and rip the ball out of Addai's hands and run 100+ yds the other way, it wouldnt count because the play was dead once the goal line was crossed. you're only argument is--"he didnt have possesion" but honestly, that was pretty clear he did

4341261298_05a7e1f3aa.jpg


2 points for the 2 pointer!
not only did he 1, cross the plane with possesion, 2 his shin/knee was down (which is enough to be ruled down) in the endzone while the ball was across the goal line with him having CLEAR possession of. yes he does bobble the ball--but well after he possessed the ball while accross the goal line. 2 points!

not taking anything away from Manning, as he had two fantastic throws--one to garcon in the ez, 1st TD--and later in fourth when touched it over 4+ defenders to dallas clark

tell me, was the sun in manning's eyes when he threw the pick 6? D coord called for pressure which hurried QB's throw and DB knowing hadto be quick throw jumped the route--no blame on refs there...unless.... no, wait--wayne coulda caught that TD on fourth down. deflected through his hands to the ground incomplete. ALL REFs there....:shrug:

That's a catch seven days a week and twice on Superbowl Sunday!!!
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
as far as the game went the refs were all for the saints.
that 2 pt conversion was not a catch.
the saints were never called for pass interference.

great job saints on ur victory but it wasn't a legit game.

come play the full strength colts (freeney and sanders) against unbiased refs.

o and also try and play us straight up. don't do all of that on-side kick stuff. classless

Unfuckingbelievably pathetic. Wow. :(
 

CartersCubs

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 2, 2008
1,586
4
0
Indiana
<TABLE class=tborder id=post2569724 cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px"><TABLE cellSpacing=6 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD noWrap>CartersCubs
user_online.gif
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2569724", true); </SCRIPT>
Registered User
</TD><TD width="100%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top noWrap>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- / user info --></TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2569724><!-- message, attachments, sig --><!-- message -->Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by the addict
unless its at the goalline...as soon as the ball crosses the goalline with possesion it counts and play is over.....he had possesion and crossed the line refs got it right...
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

explain how you bobble a football, then retain possession, then lose it in less than a second and it counts as a catch?

YOU MUST RETAIN POSSESSION THROUGH THE CATCH FOR IT TO BE A COMPLETION.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

...but i'll argue cuz in this case its right. exactly--EXACTLY as the addict said here. When crossing the goal line--so long as the carrier had possesion while it crossed--it counts.

lemme put this in terms you may understand better. say...Joseph Addai was running to the pilon and reached out with two hands grasping the ball (identical to how lance moore was holding--and "having possesion" of the ball) once THE BALL -in possession of carrier, same case in either example--crosses the plane of the goal line, the play is over--as the score has been made, line to reach gained. if then say vilma were to come by and rip the ball out of Addai's hands and run 100+ yds the other way, it wouldnt count because the play was dead once the goal line was crossed. you're only argument is--"he didnt have possesion" but honestly, that was pretty clear he did

4341261298_05a7e1f3aa.jpg


2 points for the 2 pointer!
not only did he 1, cross the plane with possesion, 2 his shin/knee was down (which is enough to be ruled down) in the endzone while the ball was across the goal line with him having CLEAR possession of. yes he does bobble the ball--but well after he possessed the ball while accross the goal line. 2 points!

not taking anything away from Manning, as he had two fantastic throws--one to garcon in the ez, 1st TD--and later in fourth when touched it over 4+ defenders to dallas clark

tell me, was the sun in manning's eyes when he threw the pick 6? D coord called for pressure which hurried QB's throw and DB knowing hadto be quick throw jumped the route--no blame on refs there...unless.... no, wait--wayne coulda caught that TD on fourth down. deflected through his hands to the ground incomplete. ALL REFs there....:shrug:

first of all im sorry ur pats lost to a bunch of losers in the ravens this year. your team showed a lot of heart in that game.

second rushing the ball and catching are totally different. if you are going to the ground with a catch you MUST retain possession throughout the entire catch. this did not happen on that 2 pt conversion. i mean i guess its possible if you think you can bobble, get possesssion, then drop the ball within 1 second then its possible. I've never seen a ref call a catch when the player didnt come up with the ball at the end of the play.

with that said the saints played very well as did the colts. The refs were on the saints side and missed a few crucial calls which could have really helped the colts. Congrats Saints on ur win and good luck next year.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
You don't even know the rules dumbass. Just admit you were beat by the better team Carter ....and do it in all your threads! It's the least you should do for all your gay Colts spamming this season.
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
first of all im sorry ur pats lost to a bunch of losers in the ravens this year. your team showed a lot of heart in that game.

why do you presume i'm a pats fan? because i simply reside from massachusetts? i've a been lifelong lions fan simply because barry sanders was my favorite player--but then...get this, i grew up.
i've never even posted a pro-patriots or even anti-colts post. i dare you to find one. i actually am skewed to dislike the pats somewhat because they usually get a free pass with press around here kissing their ass, much like someone i know -and his favorite player/team :rolleyes: . its fine to be a fan--i was giving you that. you're just too outta of touch for me care. i even offered a semi olive branch in saying GL the rest of the way--but hope that maybe someday you escape this haze of everything must come up colts or else. you're well beyond a fan--and maybe it'll never sink in. truly, GL the rest of the way.

i'll do my best to simply not venture into your posts in the furture for both of our sakes.

pats fan...that is funny. your attack actually proved how much of a... ok, i actually told myself not to go there.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,387
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
This is a great thread.. Don't have to have possession all the way through at the GOAL LINE! Been that way for years.. Don't remember the pass interference calls that were missed. I know one thing, it is sure nice to see Peyton lose..
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
This is a great thread.. Don't have to have possession all the way through at the GOAL LINE! Been that way for years..
i find it hard that everyone here is wrong with CC being the only one "enlightened" enough to see what actually should've been the case. if the refs were actually in on "giving the game to saints" why didnt they simply call it a catch and score in the first place?

then indy coulda challeneged--and lost, depriving them of a timeout and challenge. wouldnt that'a been more blow to indy? -if the refs were pucshing it that way.

the correct call was made.

i saw one pass down the sideline to wayne where either randal gay or another DB lost track of the ball and turned around late--thoughwas yards away from receiver that it wasnt even close to enough contact to have been PI, as even wayne was grabbing the DB at the end of it.... so the phantom for or against calls...i dont see.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top