Where's the bleedingpurple guy ?

[Orlando Dios]

Kirk Cousins is 0-7 SU and ATS on Monday Night Football in his career.

 

[baby johnson]

Kirk Cousins is 0-7 SU and ATS on Monday Night Football in his career.

1-7 sounds just as bad ya know

 

[Orlando Dios]

1-7 sounds just as bad ya know

Minnesota 0-13-1 ATS outdoor road games vs. team with winning record since 2014.

 

[bosbabiesarm]

1-7 sounds just as bad ya know

That?s my line. :142smilie

 

[Orlando Dios]

Kirk Cousins is 0-8 SU and ATS on Monday Night Football in his career.:0002

 

[proguy747]

Did cousins play poorly to back up your stats?

 

[yyz]

Did cousins play poorly to back up your stats?

Yes.

 

[bosbabiesarm]

Yes.

If So Wilson played poorly also.

 

[yyz]

If So Wilson played poorly also.

Wilson won.

 

[bosbabiesarm]

Wilson won.

Correct brother.
I?m sure it wasn?t because Cousins played poorly. Cook going out was a more important point in that game.
Wasn?t won or lost by either QB. Came down to Seattle made a stop on 4th down. I left that game with as much respect for Cousins as Wilson in that game.

 

[Orlando Dios]

Wilson won.

Let them keep chasing :0002 The Trend is my Friend dance2

Kirk Cousins is 0-8 SU and ATS on Monday Night Football in his career.
Minnesota 0-14-1 ATS outdoor road games vs. team with winning record since 2014.

 

[bosbabiesarm]

Let them keep chasing :0002 The Trend is my Friend dance2

Kirk Cousins is 0-8 SU and ATS on Monday Night Football in his career.
Minnesota 0-14-1 ATS outdoor road games vs. team with winning record since 2014.

If Cousins won last night everyone would still think the same of him. That he can?t win prime time game. He has won in the playoffs.

So when he does he?ll be 1-8 & 1-14-1 which are bad but have nothing to do with outcome. They didn?t lose last night because of him.
It?s one trend but when it comes down to it no one on that field cares about that trend.
On prime time games your playing top teams. If he wins next 3 games in prime time he?s 3-8 which is also bad.

 

[yyz]

Correct brother.
I?m sure it wasn?t because Cousins played poorly. Cook going out was a more important point in that game.
Wasn?t won or lost by either QB. Came down to Seattle made a stop on 4th down. I left that game with as much respect for Cousins as Wilson in that game.

All trends are sprinkled with facts, and pixie dust.

You can pick any game, and find some "stat" that will show 80% of the time "x" happens.

Who cares?

Every week some guys yap about the weather. "Going to be raining and windy! Pound the under!"

Then, the game goes 37-34. Weeeee!

BUT, when the game goes 7-6, well Holy Christ! They are the smartest guys ever!

Nothing changes.

 

[bosbabiesarm]

:toast:

All trends are sprinkled with facts, and pixie dust.

You can pick any game, and find some "stat" that will show 80% of the time "x" happens.

Who cares?

Every week some guys yap about the weather. "Going to be raining and windy! Pound the under!"

Then, the game goes 37-34. Weeeee!

BUT, when the game goes 7-6, well Holy Christ! They are the smartest guys ever!

Nothing changes.

:iagree: yyz

 

[Orlando Dios]

If Cousins won last night everyone would still think the same of him. That he can?t win prime time game. He has won in the playoffs.

So when he does he?ll be 1-8 & 1-14-1 which are bad but have nothing to do with outcome. They didn?t lose last night because of him.
It?s one trend but when it comes down to it no one on that field cares about that trend.
On prime time games your playing top teams. If he wins next 3 games in prime time he?s 3-8 which is also bad.

4 times to bank for me. Now the worst I can do is 4-1, then I'm on to the next o fer :0002

The Trend is my Friend dance2

 

[proguy747]

4 times to bank for me. Now the worst I can do is 4-1, then I'm on to the next o fer :0002

The Trend is my Friend dance2

The flaw in your logic is you put your decision on one individual in a team game. Cousins was clearly the best player for the Vikings. Situationally it was a terrible spot for the Vikings. A bunch of injuries that the regular public does not know about. The defense was horrible!!!! Hawks were the right play no doubt but your thinking why is way off.. It appears your the guy "oh look 9 blacks hit in a row on the roulette table. Red is due, bet your house."

 

[Old School]

ask Cousins where nobody will ever hear his answer how Xavier Rhodes played in that game.

 

[Old School]

ask Cousins where nobody will ever hear his answer how Xavier Rhodes played in that game.

in fact ask any Viking fan how well ancient overpaid Xavier Rhodes has played this year.

 

[bosbabiesarm]

in fact ask any Viking fan how well ancient overpaid Xavier Rhodes has played this year.

He?s bad opponents completing 82% passes against him. Not good

 

[Orlando Dios]

The flaw in your logic is you put your decision on one individual in a team game. Cousins was clearly the best player for the Vikings. Situationally it was a terrible spot for the Vikings. A bunch of injuries that the regular public does not know about. The defense was horrible!!!! Hawks were the right play no doubt but your thinking why is way off.. It appears your the guy "oh look 9 blacks hit in a row on the roulette table. Red is due, bet your house."

No Sir. That guy is you ! I bet that he is NOT due. :0002