White House/UAW

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,515
211
63
Bowling Green Ky
White House Puts UAW Ahead of Property Rights

By Michael Barone

Last Friday, the day after Chrysler filed for bankruptcy, I drove past the company's headquarters on I-75 in Auburn Hills, Mich. As I glanced at the pentagram logo, I felt myself tearing up a little bit. Anyone who grew up in the Detroit area, as I did, can't help but be sad to see a once great company fail.
But my sadness turned to anger later when I heard what bankruptcy lawyer Tom Lauria said on a WJR talk show that morning. "One of my clients," Lauria told host Frank Beckmann, "was directly threatened by the White House and in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight."
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> <!-- OAS_AD('Block'); //--> </SCRIPT><!-- JavaScript Only --><SCRIPT language=JavaScript1.1 src="http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/js/8557-72248-1235-1?mpt=159426478&mpvc=http://www.forbes.com/ads/redirectpause.html?http://ads.forbes.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/realclearpolitics.com/story/159426478/Block/FANBS2465391_hpa_ros_090501/4636_465391_default.html/34613866663238363461303262353030?"></SCRIPT><NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT><SCRIPT language=JavaScript><!-- if (document.cookie.indexOf('FANBS2=FANBS2_done') == -2) { var tomorrow = new Date(); var nowPlus = tomorrow.getTime() + (24*60*60*1000); tomorrow.setTime(nowPlus); document.cookie = 'FANBS2=FANBS2_done; path=/; domain=.forbes.com; expires=' +tomorrow.toGMTString(); }--></SCRIPT>
34613866663238363461303262353030

Lauria represented one of the bondholder firms, Perella Weinberg, which initially rejected the Obama deal that would give the bondholders about 33 cents on the dollar for their secured debts while giving the United Auto Workers retirees about 50 cents on the dollar for their unsecured debts.
This, of course, is a violation of one of the basic principles of bankruptcy law, which is that secured creditors -- those who loaned money only on the contractual promise that if the debt was unpaid they'd get specific property back -- get paid off in full before unsecured creditors get anything. Perella Weinberg withdrew its objection to the settlement, but other bondholders did not, which triggered the bankruptcy filing.
After that came a denunciation of the objecting bondholders as "speculators" by Barack Obama in his press conference last Thursday. And then death threats to bondholders from parties unknown.
The White House denied that it strong-armed Perella Weinberg. The firm issued a statement saying it decided to accept the settlement, but it pointedly did not deny that it had been threatened by the White House. Which is to say, the threat worked.
The same goes for big banks that have received billions in government TARP money. Many of them want to give back the money, but the government won't let them. They also voted to accept the Chrysler settlement. Nice little bank ya got there, wouldn't want anything to happen to it.
Left-wing bloggers have been saying that the White House's denial of making threats should be taken at face value and that Lauria's statement is not evidence to the contrary. But that's ridiculous. Lauria is a reputable lawyer and a contributor to Democratic candidates. He has no motive to lie. The White House does.
Think carefully about what's happening here. The White House, presumably car czar Steven Rattner and deputy Ron Bloom, is seeking to transfer the property of one group of people to another group that is politically favored. In the process it is setting aside basic property rights in favor of rewarding the United Auto Workers for the support the union has given the Democratic Party. The only possible limit on the White House's power is the bankruptcy judge, who might not go along.
Michigan politicians of both parties joined Obama in denouncing the holdout bondholders. They point to the sad plight of UAW retirees not getting full payment of the health-care benefits the union negotiated with Chrysler. But the plight of the beneficiaries of the pension funds represented by the bondholders is sad, too. Ordinarily you would expect these claims to be weighed and determined by the rule of law. But not apparently in this administration.
Obama's attitude toward the rule of law is apparent in the words he used to describe what he is looking for in a nominee to replace Justice David Souter. He wants "someone who understands justice is not just about some abstract legal theory," he said, but someone who has "empathy." In other words, judges should decide cases so that the right people win, not according to the rule of law.
The Chrysler negotiations will not be the last occasion for this administration to engage in bailout favoritism and crony capitalism. There's a May 31 deadline to come up with a settlement for General Motors. And there will be others. In the meantime, who is going to buy bonds from unionized companies if the government is going to take their money away and give it to the union? We have just seen an episode of Gangster Government. It is likely to be part of a continuing series.


<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> checkTextResizerCookie('article_body'); </SCRIPT>
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,783
357
83
53
Belly of the Beast
Do you have the terms of the funding to Chrysler? - they're a private company, so I can't find them anywhere, but it sounds like a secured creditor didn't like the terms and the Company went bankrupt. The secured creditor also had to agree to the bailout money, too, so I'm sure they had to give up some secured rights to make that happen.

Gangster government. The full brunt of the White House press corp. lol
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,783
357
83
53
Belly of the Beast
And here is Perella's statement where your source stated that they "pointedly did not deny that it had been threatened by the White House" :mj07:


Suggestions have been made that the Perella Weinberg Partners Xerion Fund changed its stance on the Chrysler restructuring due to pressure from White House officials. This is incorrect. The decision to accept and support the proposed deal was made by the Xerion Fund after reflecting carefully on the statement of the President when announcing Chrysler?s bankruptcy filing. In considering the President?s words and exercising our best investment judgment, we concluded that the risks of potentially severe capital loss that could arise from fighting this in bankruptcy court far outweighed any realistic potential upside.

We have a very specific mandate from our investors, and that is to carefully weigh investment risks and rewards. It is not our investment mandate to pursue political or risky legal campaigns with our investors? money. This was our assessment of investment risk and reward, nothing else.



While we did and still do believe that the lenders would be justified in pressing their objections under conventional bankruptcy law principles, we believe a settlement would now be in the best interests of all parties in the context of avoiding a drawn out contested bankruptcy litigation proceeding, and we encourage our colleagues in the loan syndicate to pursue this immediately
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,515
211
63
Bowling Green Ky
Bobby-- been looking for a lot of info on this ordeal that is not to be found--primarily how did the union who was responsible for bankruptcy come out of this as majority stock holder.


I worked for Chryler for 11 years--my father retired from there--and I will NEVER buy a Chrysler or GM product again--however doubt 5 years from now anyone will be.

On added note saw Geithner on TV a while ago speaking of how in the future privite funds would be replacing gov money in these bailouts--Thought that was a laugher--after the way they just stiffed the privite money in loans to Chrysler does he really expect anyone to beleve someone can't wait to be trapped again.

--additional note that goes with previous red flag noted on us borrowing our own money to buy our own bonds last month--

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090507/ap_on_bi_st_ma_re/us_wall_street

<CITE class=vcard>By TIM PARADIS and SARA LEPRO, AP Business Writers Tim Paradis And Sara Lepro, Ap Business Writers </CITE>? <ABBR class=recenttimedate title=2009-05-07T14:16:44-0700>10 mins ago</ABBR>
<!-- end .byline -->NEW YORK ? Weak demand at a Treasury bond auction touched off worries in the stock market Thursday about the government's ability to raise funds to fight the recession.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Bobby-- been looking for a lot of info on this ordeal that is not to be found--primarily how did the union who was responsible for bankruptcy come out of this as majority stock holder.

The Unions build the cars they don't decide what to build or take 23 million dollar sev packages and buy company jets. I see u always blaming unions but when the guy skated with 23 million sev package, a nice big fat package rewarding failure, u hide like a little school girl. That on top of his other 100 million he made while working there. This one mans salary alone could have paid the union wages for 10 years.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,783
357
83
53
Belly of the Beast
Bobby-- been looking for a lot of info on this ordeal that is not to be found--primarily how did the union who was responsible for bankruptcy come out of this as majority stock holder.

I don't think the union is the major reason, but that's pretty astonishing and Fiat brings some graphs and a management team and they get 30%.

Can't figure out why the other creditors wouldn't get a piece - there's a huge amount of money owed on that top 50 creditors list.

I've got a Jeep - love it
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,515
211
63
Bowling Green Ky
Even ABC can't look other way--but O can't help himself--only job he had outside politics was extorting subprime loans from banks for Da Base.


Chrysler Bankruptcy Exposes Dirty Politics


(CBS) <!-- sphereit start-->Chrysler's sad tale that led to this week's bankruptcy hearing in New York is not only an important business and political story. It also encompasses morality, the rule of law and strong-arm tactics used by some politicians.

Our story begins with the slow downfall of Chrysler, which succumbed to bankruptcy after experiencing a steep sales decline of 48 percent in one year. During its slide, Chrysler borrowed money from lenders and in return signed a contract promising that as so-called senior creditors, they'd get paid before anyone else if the company went under.

These creditors, by the way, represent something of a cross-section of America: the University of Kentucky, Kraft Foods' retirement fund, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, pension funds, teachers' credit unions, and so on.

A normal bankruptcy filing would be straightforward. Senior creditors get paid 100 cents on the dollar. Everyone else gets in line.

But President Obama and his allies don't want that to happen. So they interfered on behalf of unions (the junior creditors) and publicly upbraided the senior creditors who were asserting their contractual rights and threatening to head to bankruptcy court.


Last week Mr. Obama lambasted them as "a small group of speculators" who "endanger Chrysler's future by refusing to sacrifice like everyone else."

Rep. John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, sent reporters a statement calling the creditors "vultures" and "rouge hedge funds." Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm piled on, taking aim during her radio address at a "few greedy hedge funds that didn't care how much pain the company's failure would have inflicted on families and communities everywhere."

It must be a coincidence that the United Auto Workers has handed $25.4 million to federal politicians over the last two decades, with 99 percent of that cash going to Democrats. And that Mr. Obama's final campaign stop on Election Day was a UAW phone bank.

If those politicians thought about this a bit more, they'd probably realize their mistake. Creditors didn't force Chrysler's management to head to the capital markets and beg for funds: It was poor management, uncompetitive wages, and a union that opposed pay cuts.

Without those greedy "vultures" and "rogues" injecting sorely-needed cash into a business they knew was risky, Chrysler might have been forced to declare bankruptcy much earlier. (And now that lenders know they may be demonized by the president, will they be as likely to help out next time?)

One of the better critiques of this unusual situation comes from Clifford Asness, managing partner at a $20 billion hedge fund named AQR Capital Management. His essay responds to what he called "toxic demagoguery" and says "the president's attempted diktat takes money from bondholders and gives it to a labor union that delivers money and votes for him."

On Wednesday, the list of creditors standing up for their rights shrunk and now includes OppenheimerFunds, Stairway Capital, Schultze Asset Management, Group G Partners, and Foxhill Capital Partners - which hold a combined $295 million of about $6.9 billion in secured Chrysler debt.

A document that the non-TARP creditors filed with the bankruptcy judge about the proposed sale to Fiat says: "The sale is far from an arm's length transaction, but rather, is the result of a tainted sales process dominated by the United States government... It is a sale that was orchestrated entirely by the Treasury and foisted upon (Chrysler)... Well before the filing, (Chrysler) had ceased to function as an independent company and had become an instrumentality of the government."

So if you're keeping score, you have a bankrupt company depending on the government for money negotiating with some TARP-funded creditors depending on the government for money and still more creditors who may hold insurance policies with AIG, which depends on the government for money. And we're already hearing similar allegations about General Motors and political interference.

One disturbing report came from a well-respected attorney representing the dissident Chrysler creditors. Thomas Lauria, the head of White & Case's bankruptcy practice, says that he was threatened by Steven Rattner, the White House's auto task force chief. (A White House spokesman denies making any threats.)

"I represent one less investor today than I represented yesterday," Lauria said on a Detroit radio show. "One of my clients was directly threatened by the White House and in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight. That's how hard it is to stand on this side of the fence." Lauria said that his clients were willing to compromise on 50 cents on the dollar, but the government offered them only 29 cents.

In the Federalist Papers in 1788, James Madison wrote that "laws impairing the obligation of contracts are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation." Unfortunately, Washington politicians seem to pay little attention to history, morality, or the rule of law.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top