mansa_musa said:
Steve has a title his team earned in a real title game where both teams had a shot to win it unlike USC.
So **** off jackass.
Who do you think are the top 5 programs......
- Thread starter Scott4USC
- Start date
Steve has a title his team earned in a real title game where both teams had a shot to win it unlike USC.
So **** off jackass.
BBK in another thread nailed it perfectly:
"Also if you want to talk about dynasties how about OU being 48-6 with 1 NC and in the title game this year. Consistency and championships are whay dynasties are about not winning one AP title in almost 30 years. Nice try though trying to talk everyone into it with cut and paste stats."
Scott come back to us when USC does something like OU did over the last couple of seasons.
"Also if you want to talk about dynasties how about OU being 48-6 with 1 NC and in the title game this year. Consistency and championships are whay dynasties are about not winning one AP title in almost 30 years. Nice try though trying to talk everyone into it with cut and paste stats."
Scott come back to us when USC does something like OU did over the last couple of seasons.
Mr Hockey
You def. have a very poor reading comprehension. Again you put words into my mouth which I never said. I have said USC is "building" a dynasty and I have said I think USC will dominate college football as long as Carroll and Chow are at USC. I said USC is a monster program along with OU, LSU, Miami and few others. I never said USC was the only monster program. I never said USC is a dynasty right now. I also have no idea why you mention dynasty when this argument is whether USC is a monster program or not.
You are worthless to debate. You like to be childish/immature and call people names. For starters, that weakens your credibility and shows lack of character. You never offer support to back up your opinion. You fail to counter argue. You often misquote me and I often have to correct your posts for falsely implying things that i never said. That is a reflection of poor reading comprehension skills.
Are you educated?
You def. have a very poor reading comprehension. Again you put words into my mouth which I never said. I have said USC is "building" a dynasty and I have said I think USC will dominate college football as long as Carroll and Chow are at USC. I said USC is a monster program along with OU, LSU, Miami and few others. I never said USC was the only monster program. I never said USC is a dynasty right now. I also have no idea why you mention dynasty when this argument is whether USC is a monster program or not.
You are worthless to debate. You like to be childish/immature and call people names. For starters, that weakens your credibility and shows lack of character. You never offer support to back up your opinion. You fail to counter argue. You often misquote me and I often have to correct your posts for falsely implying things that i never said. That is a reflection of poor reading comprehension skills.
Are you educated?
I forgot about the Gators title. I apologize about that oversight! That is the first thing I have actually learned from your posts! I congratulate you on remembering that far back! Now you just need help w your grammar, reading comprehension & football handicapping!
Last edited:
mansa_musa said:
The last thing I need help with is my football handicapping.
Scott stop trying to change your story. You have been spreading your garbage for months on how great USC is & how some including yourself felt they were the best team in the country at the end of the last 2 years & when facts prove otherwise.
If you have any common sense you would admit that you might have a point about this past season but the season before you are dead wrong!
mansa_musa said:
The one thing I'll give you is you don't display the my dick is bigger then yours mentality that Scott does.
We might disagree on some points but I think you can be reasoned with unlike Scott.
