Why are we REALLY messing with Russia?

Dead Money

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 15, 2005
4,350
64
0
Upstairs watching sports on the big TV.
It boggles my mind that we appear to be on a war path with Russia.

This is not a piss-ant Middle East dictator with limited resources, this is a country that can easily match us nuke per nuke.

Lets look behind the obvious news that is custom fed
to the American people, Soviet "Meddling."


The Dollar, Reserve Currency of the World.

I am not by any stretch of imagination an expert on many topics, most of these facts are from other sites written by people a lot smarter than I.
I am doing this as an self education exercise, the ''News" we are force-fed is badly tainted.


RESERVE CURRENCY, what is it?

From Wikipedia, A reserve currency (or anchor currency) is a currency that is held in significant quantities by governments and institutions as part of their foreign exchange reserves, and that is commonly used in international transactions.

People who live in a country that issues a reserve currency can purchase imports and borrow across borders more cheaply than people in other nations because they don't need to exchange their currency to do so.

Today, the US dollar and the Euro make up 90% of allocated reserves globally.



" How the Dollar Stays Afloat"


"Here's something I think not many people understand. After all the money creation, debt expansion, and bailing-out of big banks, you might wonder why the dollar still stands as the most important global reserve currency. Never mind 2014, the dollar should have been dead by 1933.

The key is what monetary economists call the "exorbitant privilege" of a reserve currency. It works somewhat like a cycle:

As the US creates too many financial assets (money and debt), there's a lot of American money looking for good homes.

"Emerging countries" look good to US investors both because their asset prices are cheaper, and because the early wave of investments will receive currency appreciation too. (Plus, these countries are typically touted as the wave of the future.) A lot of capital flows to these countries.

But as time goes on, it becomes more and more apparent that these countries have weak governing systems against asset bubbles (and probably no governence would be good enough anyway to deal with the huge capital inflow.) Also, the US authorities start considering taking off their monetary and fiscal crutches for the economy, which turns off the flow of hot money.

Eventually, these foreign investments crash as capital flees back to the US. People lose money, asset values, and jobs in these countries.

These countries are now desparate to generate demand. They peg (or "softly manage") their currencies cheaply against the dollar to make their export cheaper.

Due to the workings of international money, this also gives their central banks the added benefit of storing up dollars as reserves, which will help soften the blow in a future capital flight as above.

The dollar gets strengthened, yet again, both in value and in confidence. Essentially, the US enjoys cheap goods and services while giving printed paper to these countries.

As US elites feel free to create financial asset without worrying about bubbles or inflation, for now (since other countries are sucking up a good part of those assets), eventually, asset bubbles appear in the US (and the irresistibility of this process is the key problem of the modern monetary system.) And eventually those will crash too.

US authorities now have to create money and public debt to bail out the US economy, and the cycle starts all over again."

My thought, whomever is the issuer of the World's Reserve Currency, pretty much rules the world.
E

MORE To COME....
 

Dead Money

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 15, 2005
4,350
64
0
Upstairs watching sports on the big TV.
The dollar,petro dollar, Sadam Hussein

The dollar,petro dollar, Sadam Hussein

Short version, History lesson, condensed from Wikipedia and Petrodollar.


MID 1944 it was apparent the war was winding down and the outcome inevitable. Bretton Woods conference takes place, July 1944.

The plan involved nations agreeing to a system of fixed but adjustable exchange rates where the currencies were pegged against the dollar, with the dollar itself convertible into gold.

So in effect this was a gold ? dollar exchange standard. There were a number of improvements on the old gold standard. Two international institutions, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank were created; A key part of their function was to replace private finance as more reliable source of lending for investment projects in developing states.

At the time the soon to be defeated powers of Germany and Japan were envisaged as states soon to be in need of such development, and there was a desire from both the US and Britain not to see the defeated powers saddled with punitive sanctions that would inflict lasting pain on future generations.

Towards the end of the Bretton Woods era,(1971) the central role of the dollar became a problem as international demand eventually forced the US to run a persistent trade deficit, which undermined confidence in the dollar.

This, together with the emergence of a parallel market for gold where the price soared above the official US mandated price, led to speculators running down the US gold reserves. Even when convertibility was restricted to nations only, some, notably France,[13] continued building up hoards of gold at the expense of the US.

Eventually these pressures caused President Nixon to end all convertibility into gold on 15 August 1971. This event marked the effective end of the Bretton Woods system.



Basically the dollar, had become the basis of the world's monetary system; backed by nothing but faith and our military might.



ENTER THE PETRODOLLAR



Two years later, 1973, in an effort to maintain global demand for U.S. dollars, another system was created called the petrodollar system. In 1973, a deal was struck between Saudi Arabia and the United States in which every barrel of oil purchased from the Saudis would be denominated in U.S. dollars.

Under this new arrangement, any country that sought to purchase oil from Saudi Arabia would be required to first exchange their own national currency for U.S. dollars.

In exchange for Saudi Arabia's willingness to denominate their oil sales exclusively in U.S. dollars, the United States offered weapons and protection of their oil fields from neighboring nations, including Israel.<

By 1975, all of the OPEC nations had agreed to price their own oil supplies exclusively in U.S. dollars in exchange for weapons and military protection.

This petrodollar system, or more simply known as an "oil for dollars" system, created an immediate artificial demand for U.S. dollars around the globe.

And of course, as global oil demand increased, so did the demand for U.S. dollars.

The Primary Benefits of the Petrodollar System
The petrodollar system has proven tremendously beneficial to the U.S. economy.

In addition to creating a marketplace for affordable imported goods from countries who need U.S. dollars, there are more specific benefits.

In essence, America receives a double loan out of every global oil transaction.

First, oil consumers are required to purchase oil in U.S. dollars.

Second, the excess profits of the oil-producing nations are then placed into U.S. government debt securities held in Western banks.

The petrodollar system provides at least three immediate benefits to the United States.

It increases global demand for U.S. dollars
It increases global demand for U.S. debt securities
It gives the United States the ability to buy oil with a currency it can print at will.



The world currently consumes nearly 90 million barrels of oil per day.

According to some projections, global oil demand will reach well over 100 million barrels per day by 2015. And thanks to the petrodollar system, growing global demand for oil leads to an increase in U.S. dollar demand.
This artificial demand for U.S. dollars has provided remarkable benefits for the U.S. economy. It has also required the Federal Reserve to keep the dollar in plentiful supply.



By perpetually expanding the U.S. money supply, America?s standard of living increases as well. The only problem with this situation is that the only way that it can be sustained is if the demand for the dollar and for U.S. debt securities remains consistently strong.

Grasping this last point is extremely important. For if the artificial global dollar demand, made possible by the petrodollar system, were ever to crumble, foreign nations who had formerly found it beneficial to hold U.S. dollars would suddenly find that they no longer needed the massive amounts that they were holding.

This massive amount of dollars, which would no longer be useful to foreign nations, would come rushing back to their place of origin? America.

Obviously, an influx of dollars into the American economy would lead to massive inflationary pressures within our economic system.

Understanding the petrodollar system will help you make sense of the hundreds of U.S. military bases stationed in over 130 countries.

After all, maintaining an empire dependent upon a ?dollars for oil? system is no cheap task and requires careful monitoring and oversight of the world?s oil supplies.

Chief among the potential concerns for the petrodollar guardians are: threats of restrictions on oil supplies, new oil discoveries in potentially ?anti-Western? oil fields, the nationalizing of a country?s oil supplies, and perhaps most importantly, devising ?permanent solutions? to the problems presented by nations who dare challenge the current ?dollars for oil? system.




SADDAM HUSSEIN NOVEMBER 2000 NEWS STORY



Europe's dream of promoting the euro as a competitor to the U.S. dollar may get a boost from SADDAM HUSSEIN. Iraq says that from now on, it wants payments for its oil in euros, despite the fact that the battered European currency unit, which used to be worth quite a bit more than $1, has dropped to about 82[cents]. Iraq says it will no longer accept dollars for oil because it does not want to deal "in the currency of the enemy."

By 2002 HUSSEIN had converted totally to the "Petroeuro" in essence, DUMPING THE DOLLAR.

2003 we invade Iraq on the grounds of Al Queda, weapons of mass destruction and to promote democracy after Sept 11th attack, its an easy sell.

Oh, by the way....It should be noted that Iraq?s proven oil supplies are considered to be among the largest in the world. However, some experts believe that Iraq?s oilfields, many of which have yet to be exploited, will catapult Iraq above Saudi Arabia in total proven oil reserves in the coming years.



Since 1980, America has devolved from being the world?s greatest creditor nation to the world?s greatest debtor nation. But thanks to the massive artificial demand for U.S. dollars and government debt made possible by the petrodollar system, America is able to continue its spending binges, imperial pursuits, reckless wars, and record deficits.

In America today, we are living proof that having the world?s most important currency translates into a higher standard of living than most nations.

At one point in America?s history, our largest export was a variety of manufactured goods, made right here in the U.S.

Today, America?s largest export is the U.S. dollar.

And the dollar costs us practically nothing to create. How long will it be before the nations of the world figure out the dollar fiasco is a fraud?

Instead of viewing U.S. dollars as worthless paper backed by nothing (as they should), foreign oil producers and consumers were convinced ? and required ? to hold U.S. dollars in order to purchase oil back in the 1970′s.

NEXT, RUSSIA
 

Dead Money

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 15, 2005
4,350
64
0
Upstairs watching sports on the big TV.
WHY WE MESS WITH RUSSIA...

WHY WE MESS WITH RUSSIA...

This has been quite the educational path for me, puts the world a little more in context.


RUSSIA, CHINA and the future of economics.




BRICS.. a term you will here more and more about.

The BRIC countries label refers to a select group of four large, developing countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China). The four BRIC countries (South Africa has also applied for membership) are distinguished from a host of other promising emerging markets by their demographic and economic potential to rank among the world?s largest and most influential economies in the 21st century (and by having a reasonable chance of realizing that potential).

Together, the four original BRIC countries comprise more than 2.8 billion people or 40 percent of the world?s population, cover more than a quarter of the world?s land area over three continents, and account for more than 25 percent of global GDP.

BRIC Countries? Path to 2050

A country?s population and demographics, among other factors, directly affect the potential size of its economy and its capacity to function as an engine of global economic growth and development. As early as 2003, Goldman Sachs forecasted that China and India would become the first and third largest economies by 2050, with Brazil and Russia capturing the fifth and sixth spots.

The BRIC thesis proposes that China and India will become the world's dominant suppliers of manufactured goods and services, respectively, while Brazil and Russia will become similarly dominant as suppliers of raw materials.

It's important to note that the Goldman Sachs thesis isn't that these countries are a political alliance (like the European Union) or a formal trading association - but they have the potential to form a powerful economic bloc.


HERE IS THE BIGGIE


If after months of Eurasian axis formation, one still hasn't realized why in the grand game over Ukraine supremacy - not to mention superpower geopolitics - Europe, and the West, has zero leverage, while Russia has all the trump cards, then today's latest development in Chinese-Russian cooperation should make it abundantly clear.

Overnight, following a grand ceremony in the Siberian city of Yakutsk, Russia and China officially began the construction of a new gas pipeline linking the countries. The bottom line to Russia - nearly half a trillion after China's CNPC agreed to buy $400bn in gas from Russia's Gazprom back in May. In return, Russia will ship 38 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas annually over a period of 30 years.

The 3,968 km pipeline linking gas fields in eastern Siberia to China will be the world's largest fuel network in the world.

"The new gas branch will significantly strengthen the economic cooperation with countries in the Asia-Pacific region and above all - our key partner China."

?Once we create a gas pipeline network here in the Far East and Siberia, we will be able to connect European pipeline system to the East. And this, in terms of export opportunities and expanding Russia?s ?gasification?, is very beneficial.

Depending on the situation in world markets, we can more effectively implement gas flows- either more to the West or to the East,? Putin.

Purchases will in most likely be denominated in Rubles, or Chinese Yuan, NOT DOLLARS

Nearly 30% of Europe's natural gas imports come from Russia. The U.S. would like to see that replaced by American natural gas. But exporting liquefied natural gas across the Atlantic is not as cheap as piping it in from Russian fields.


Conclusions:

We are experiencing a dramatic generational change in the worlds
economic and political allegiances.

The US has no choice other than to keep the dollar charade continuing or the party is over.

We, the USA, may be in for a big reset...economically and politically.

With these silly sanctions against Russia, it may be
a very, very cold winter in Europe.

We may be foolishly stumbling into an eye to eye
military confrontation with Russia.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
We may be foolishly stumbling into an eye to eye
military confrontation with Russia.

The US aint stumbling into any war with Russia . Get Real


Putin can and will do anything he wants and can run circles around sanctions to make them not mean shit.

I was surprised when the Ukraine got away from the Russians. Putin losing face over many issues in the country. He is land grabbing and there is no stopping him.

we are going to war with Russia. :142smilie

it aint happening in this lifetime.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
zprombank GPB (OJSC), a Russian bank targeted with sanctions by President Obama over the Ukraine crisis, has hired two former U.S. senators to lobby against those sanctions, according to a new disclosure filed with the Senate.

Gazprombank is controlled by Russia?s state-owned energy company Gazprom, the country?s largest gas producer; it supplies about a third of Europe?s natural gas.


In a filing submitted Friday and effective that day, former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and former Senator John Breaux, D-La., are listed as the main lobbyists under the Gazprombank account for the firm Squire Patton Boggs, lobbying on ?banking laws and regulations including applicable sanctions.?:00hour

Gazprombank GPB (OJSC) is a subsidiary of Gazprombank, Russia?s third largest bank. On July 16th, the U.S. Treasury Department added it to a list of Russian firms barred from debt financing with U.S. institutions.

Lott and Breaux left public service almost a decade ago and are among more than 300 members of Congress who?ve become lobbyists, and begun petitioning former colleagues on behalf of clients, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. In 2008, they started a lobbying firm with their sons, Breaux Lott Leadership Group, which was acquired by D.C.-lobbying powerhouse Patton Boggs in 2010. Patton Boggs merged with Squire Sanders to form Squire Patton Boggs in June.

Gazprom has been in the news a lot. In July, The Permanent Court of Arbitration, an intergovernmental organization located in The Hague, Netherlands, ruled that the Russian government should reimburse $50 billion to certain shareholders of former Russian oil company Yukos. The tribunal said the government, in a series of actions starting in 2003 ?accompanied by serious due process violations,? had dismantled and seized the assets of Yukos and transferred them to Gazprom and state-run oil company Rosneft.

Last month, Russian gas firm OAO Novatek retained Washington, D.C., public relations firm Qorvis to lobby the administration and Congress after one of its largest shareholders, an associate of Russian president Vladimir Putin, was similarly targeted for sanctions by the United States.
..................................................................................................


they have former US Senators putting the fix in .

Its all about the money. I am surprised Dickie Cheney aint in there with his hand out talking out of both sides of his fat mouth.

how pathetic.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Andrew Sabin gave Republicans so much money in 2012 that he accidentally went over a limit on how much individuals could donate to federal candidates and party committees.

So Sabin, who owns a New York-based precious-metals refining business, was delighted when the Supreme Court did away with the limit in April. Since then, he has been doling out contributions to congressional candidates across the country ? in Colorado, Texas, Iowa and ?even Alaska,? he said.

Top Republicans have taken notice: Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) and Florida Gov. Rick Scott have paid him personal visits this year, he noted proudly.

?You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues,? said Sabin, who has given away more than $177,000. ?They know that I?m a big supporter.?
........................................................................................

our goverment is bought and paid for

and has been for a long long time

most people are too stupid to see it and change anything

we get what we pay for , just like this guy
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
MOSCOW, Sept 3 (Reuters) - The forces responsible for Russia's strategic nuclear arsenal will conduct major exercises this month involving more than 4,000 soldiers, the Defense Ministry said on Wednesday, in the latest sign of rising tension with NATO over the Ukraine crisis.

In an announcement a day before the start of a NATO summit in Wales, RIA news agency quoted the ministry as saying the exercises would take place in Altai in south-central Russia and would also include around 400 technical units and extensive use of air power.

The agency quoted Dmitry Andreyev, a major in the strategic rocket forces, as saying troops would practice countering irregular units and high-precision weapons, and "conducting combat missions in conditions of active radio-electronic jamming and intensive enemy actions in areas of troop deployment."

He said enemy forces would be represented in the exercises by spetsnaz (special forces) units.

Supersonic MiG-31 fighter-interceptors and Su-24MR reconnaissance aircraft would take part, Andreyev said, saying the scale of air power involved was unprecedented for exercises of this kind.

Both Russia and NATO have stepped up military maneuvers since the outbreak of conflict in Ukraine between government forces and pro-Russian separatists in the east of the former Soviet republic.

A Kremlin security adviser said on Tuesday that Russia would update its military doctrine this year in the light of the Ukraine crisis and the sharp deterioration in relations with NATO. (
......................................................................................

that dont look like nuke excersises to me.

maybe they should set off a small nuke just to let the world see how it is useless to fuck with them. Good lesson for Iran to learn.
 

Dead Money

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 15, 2005
4,350
64
0
Upstairs watching sports on the big TV.
Our firm commitment ?

Our firm commitment ?

Portion of Obama speech from Tallinn Estonia yesterday.

"[T]he defense of Tallinn and Riga and Vilnius is just as important as the defense of Berlin and Paris and London," Obama said. "Article 5 is crystal clear. An attack on one is an attack on all. So if, in such a moment, you ever ask again, who'll come to help, you'll know the answer: the NATO alliance, including the armed forces of the United States of America, right here, present, now."








In the meantime, today, a Russian general has called for Russia to revamp its military doctrine, last updated in 2010, to clearly identify the U.S. and its NATO allies as Moscow's enemy number one.

That in itself is not disturbing: we reported as much yesterday and is merely more rhetorical posturing. Where things, however, get very problematic is that the general demands that Russia spell out the conditions under which the country would launch a preemptive nuclear strike against the 28-member military alliance.

Moscow Times reports that Russia's military doctrine, a strategy document through which the government interprets military threats and crafts possible responses, is being revised in light of threats connected to the Arab Spring, the Syrian civil war and the conflict in Ukraine, the deputy chief of the Kremlin's security council told RIA Novosti on Tuesday.

That however is the soundbite for politically correct media purposes. Because within the Defense Ministry there are voices calling for different priorities.

"First and foremost, the likely enemy of Russia should be clearly identified in this strategic document, something absent from the 2010 military doctrine.

In my view, our primary enemy is the U.S. and the North Atlantic bloc," General Yury Yakubov, a senior Defense Ministry official, was quoted as saying by Interfax.
 

Woodson

L I V I N
Forum Member
Oct 23, 1999
15,691
206
63
Blockchain
Putin has been surgical in Russia's geopolitical strategies. What's great about the Ukraine situation is how this has BLOWN UP US foreign policy agendas. No country can join NATO if there is a territory dispute with a bordering country. Russia moves in and creates the dispute... Ukraine can not be brought into NATO.

Yahtzee mf'ers!!!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top