JUST GOT HOME AND DIDN'T SEE THE END OF THE GAME, BUT A FRIEND CALLED AND TOLD ME WHAT HAPPENED. WHY DID THEY KICK A FG IN THAT SITUATION? MY FRIEND THINKS IT'S FIXED EVERY TIME SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPENS. :0008
WHY DID OAKLAND KICK A FG WHEN THEY DID?
- Thread starter BuckwheatJWN
- Start date
Need 2 scores
Also need time to get the 2 scores
Ive always said teams should do it more....take the 3 early and save time....
Need onside kick regardless. ...may as well recover with more then 15 seconds
And denver/peyton a small fav vs DA oakland raiders....im sure vegas would have wanted any fix resulting in a oakland cover
Just my thoughts
But i had no bet or id prolly be pissed too
Also need time to get the 2 scores
Ive always said teams should do it more....take the 3 early and save time....
Need onside kick regardless. ...may as well recover with more then 15 seconds
And denver/peyton a small fav vs DA oakland raiders....im sure vegas would have wanted any fix resulting in a oakland cover
Just my thoughts
But i had no bet or id prolly be pissed too
Made no sense to me either,go for a TD then take advantage of Seabass leg later if u get close enough,they settled for the onside kick chance and it didnt payoff
OH, I'VE SEEN IT OFTEN BUT NOT WITH THAT MUCH TIME ON THE CLOCK.......HOW MANY TIME OUTS DID THEY HAVE? NOT SURE WHY THAT WOULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
I get the logic but......
There was 1:45 left when they sent on seabass
1st down
Oak had 1 timeout left (still time to continue drive)
Seabass has a strong leg but...a 50 yard fg???
With about a min left and a 40 yrd fg....sure......but with that much time and from that distance it was a strange call (and inhad den -4 so i was all for it from a money perspective )
There was 1:45 left when they sent on seabass
1st down
Oak had 1 timeout left (still time to continue drive)
Seabass has a strong leg but...a 50 yard fg???
With about a min left and a 40 yrd fg....sure......but with that much time and from that distance it was a strange call (and inhad den -4 so i was all for it from a money perspective )
