wth is wrong with this administration?....
why exactly does this policy, which has been in effect for more than 60 years need to be turned on its head and made far more complex than it need be?.....seriously....
i'm waiting for the media to ask this question...but i`m not holding my breath...
the obama administration(if it god forbid faced with this situation) could have simply chosen to not retaliate with a nuclear strike as is its right and judgment as commander in chief. ....
instead, he's made it a public acknowledgment and telegraphed a policy change that our nation's enemies may use against us.....
we`re talking a potential chemical or biological attack that could kill thousands.....and we couldn`t respond in kind because our leaders are busy dismantling our chemical and biological arsenal...
why woudn`t the administrations policy be "we will use whatever methods that we deem necessary in any given situation" and leave it at that?....
man...it just gets stranger and stranger....
t
why exactly does this policy, which has been in effect for more than 60 years need to be turned on its head and made far more complex than it need be?.....seriously....
i'm waiting for the media to ask this question...but i`m not holding my breath...
the obama administration(if it god forbid faced with this situation) could have simply chosen to not retaliate with a nuclear strike as is its right and judgment as commander in chief. ....
instead, he's made it a public acknowledgment and telegraphed a policy change that our nation's enemies may use against us.....
we`re talking a potential chemical or biological attack that could kill thousands.....and we couldn`t respond in kind because our leaders are busy dismantling our chemical and biological arsenal...
why woudn`t the administrations policy be "we will use whatever methods that we deem necessary in any given situation" and leave it at that?....
man...it just gets stranger and stranger....
t