why make our nuclear policy public knowledge?...

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
wth is wrong with this administration?....

why exactly does this policy, which has been in effect for more than 60 years need to be turned on its head and made far more complex than it need be?.....seriously....

i'm waiting for the media to ask this question...but i`m not holding my breath...

the obama administration(if it god forbid faced with this situation) could have simply chosen to not retaliate with a nuclear strike as is its right and judgment as commander in chief. ....

instead, he's made it a public acknowledgment and telegraphed a policy change that our nation's enemies may use against us.....

we`re talking a potential chemical or biological attack that could kill thousands.....and we couldn`t respond in kind because our leaders are busy dismantling our chemical and biological arsenal...

why woudn`t the administrations policy be "we will use whatever methods that we deem necessary in any given situation" and leave it at that?....

man...it just gets stranger and stranger....



t
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,189
130
63
berlin md
Ok what enemies?

Second maybe they are trying to be less hypocritical, its nonsense to tell places like Iran to not use nuclear power when we still threaten to use it as a weapon.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
its much more open and reasonable to do it this way in my thinking.

We should never use nukes again.

We know what happens.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
I was waiting from this post from gw.

Let me ask you this, Do you really believe everything the government tells you? This is all talk.
 

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
We are in serious trouble w/this adm. I know Bush was bad but damn...having other countries sign a treaty that we will not use nukes against them no matter what. This gives them free range to do any damn thing to us and knowing they will not get nuked. We are the or should I say was the superpower. Dont FUK W/us or we will have our weapons of all kinds on ur azz....yeah right sign the treaty and we will fight fair just like you would do to us LMFAO. Telling Iran they should have no nukes....HELL YES U DUMBAZZES...They threatened to do away w/Israel and the USA. Give nukes to crazy ass leadership and you will find yourself at war. Nuke saved our azz in WW ll but not after the first nuke....REMEMBER it took 2 nukes for them top surrender. If you think all leaders of the world want to comprimiise and work things out you are sadly mistaken...they want to rule and will destroy you first then will talk. The middleeast needs a nuke dropped on them now.....or call me a war monger and wait til they drop one on us...which will be too late. Obama...get more security b/c I would never wish harm on a president and never want to see it done but UR pissing Americans off and some goof off will take a pop at him.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
We are in serious trouble w/this adm. I know Bush was bad but damn...having other countries sign a treaty that we will not use nukes against them no matter what. This gives them free range to do any damn thing to us and knowing they will not get nuked. We are the or should I say was the superpower. Dont FUK W/us or we will have our weapons of all kinds on ur azz....yeah right sign the treaty and we will fight fair just like you would do to us LMFAO. Telling Iran they should have no nukes....HELL YES U DUMBAZZES...They threatened to do away w/Israel and the USA. Give nukes to crazy ass leadership and you will find yourself at war. Nuke saved our azz in WW ll but not after the first nuke....REMEMBER it took 2 nukes for them top surrender. If you think all leaders of the world want to comprimiise and work things out you are sadly mistaken...they want to rule and will destroy you first then will talk. The middleeast needs a nuke dropped on them now.....or call me a war monger and wait til they drop one on us...which will be too late. Obama...get more security b/c I would never wish harm on a president and never want to see it done but UR pissing Americans off and some goof off will take a pop at him.

You are kidding yourself if you think we are giving up the option to nuke some of these countries. Since when does the US pay attention to International Law? Its just for show.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
its much more open and reasonable to do it this way in my thinking.

We should never use nukes again.

We know what happens.

lemme ask you a question...before the hand is played,do you hire a marching band to celebrate being dealt a royal flush?...


it`s not about the actual "use" of nuclear weapons...it`s about the sword of damocles hanging over the head of anyone even considering an attack on the u.s....it`s about deterrent...and it`s worked beautifully for over 60 years...

if we`d had this policy in effect previously,given russia`s prior advantage in tanks and conventional forces,the landscape of europe and the world might look very different today...



this is their defense strategy...reduce,stop upgrqading and eventually dismantle our nuclear umbrella....while "hoping"(theres that word again)that the russians.chinese,n.koreans,iranians or whomever see our noble gesture and follow suit....

their strategy is to reduce the disincentive to attack our country....

brillaint!...
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Nothing new here. Its very close to the last 50 years. Said another way. No one can win a nuke war.
Anyone wanting to know our policy on this for many years. Just had to go to a library and read.
 

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
No 1 can win a nuke war????

No 1 can win a nuke war????

It won one for the USA. Know ur history.

Signing the treaty, it is just for show TU??? OMG you Libs have lost ur minds and the dumbazz repubs are too freaking scared to stand up to this socialist brother who is destroying America and making all Americans unsafe IMO.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
It won one for the USA. Know ur history.

Signing the treaty, it is just for show TU??? OMG you Libs have lost ur minds and the dumbazz repubs are too freaking scared to stand up to this socialist brother who is destroying America and making all Americans unsafe IMO.

Hey dipshit. We won with a nuke cause we were the only one with one. WTF does your statement mean?

Yes, its just for show. Doesn't matter who is in the white house. Both parties are practically the same. We are still in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
Dipshit???? You fuking moron...ur the most unintellingent SOB in this forum. Lets give every 1 nukes and if they sign the treaty then we cannot use all our defenses agaisnt them. Our nukes are for show???? Yes You do have a point....B/C if you fuk w/us then your azz wil be a parking lot. Why didn't the senate or the public have a vote on this? Why , oh you ask why? B/C this dictator is attempting to solve problems thru meetings....LMAO they will cut his head off and ours when given the chance. Obama said we will use conventional weapons if attacked by others who use weapons of mass destruction....what an idiot community organizer. Did U hear me...A fukn community organizer...nobody knows knows nothing about this communist. But damn our we learning and I will bet any 1....YES any 1.....he will not be re-elected...
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Dipshit???? You fuking moron...ur the most unintellingent SOB in this forum. Lets give every 1 nukes and if they sign the treaty then we cannot use all our defenses agaisnt them. Our nukes are for show???? Yes You do have a point....B/C if you fuk w/us then your azz wil be a parking lot. Why didn't the senate or the public have a vote on this? Why , oh you ask why? B/C this dictator is attempting to solve problems thru meetings....LMAO they will cut his head off and ours when given the chance. Obama said we will use conventional weapons if attacked by others who use weapons of mass destruction....what an idiot community organizer. Did U hear me...A fukn community organizer...nobody knows knows nothing about this communist. But damn our we learning and I will bet any 1....YES any 1.....he will not be re-elected...


I never get shocked by what I read on here anymore.
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
Nothing new here. Its very close to the last 50 years. Said another way. No one can win a nuke war.
Anyone wanting to know our policy on this for many years. Just had to go to a library and read.

Simple and to the point djv. :clap: It is hard to imagine the extreme statements about Obama in this thread when our nuclear intentions have been public knowlege since 1952. If Obama is a "communiist running a dictatorship", he will have to stand in line behind every other president. The most adamant about this was President Reagan, with a book written exclusively about ridding the world of nuclear weapons. Reagan was no communist dictator, neither is Obama. Those types of statements about President Obama are just plain wrong. That type of rhetoric has no benefit for our country and ultimately makes our country less safe. YOU are supporting/promoting terrorist action.

Currently, our biggest nuclear threat is protecting present inventories from being stolen or traded on the black market. There are thousands of "suitcase" nuclear bombs in the world. As for our biggest threats, they are the shoe bombs etc. that can go off anywhere at anytime.

What is being said in these threads: worry about our nuclear intentions? Please! You are the same people that would threaten violence if the President decided to eliminate income taxes for everyone. Obama will do no right, no matter what he does. I have never met anyone who is incapable of doing the right thing some of the time. Seems to be the case with some about Obama and their thinking will never be changed.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Hold me, I'm scared :scared

It's all falling into place.

Step back from all your own sensibilities.

Throw all of the Republican Vs. Democrat

Crap out the window ! Take a look at

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs



maslow.gif
 

JOSHNAUDI

That Guy
Forum Member
Dec 12, 2000
10,254
364
83
49
Seguin, TX
www.schwartz-associates.com
nobody knows knows nothing

Said another way

Everybody knows knows something


GW - Big shout out on the Sword of Damocles reference

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/04/05/new-obama-policy-no-nuke-retaliation-for-bio-or-chemical-attack-mr-obama%E2%80%99s-new-strategy-is-bound-to-be-controversial-both-among-conservatives-who-have-warned-against-diluting-america/
"
It eliminates much of the ambiguity that has deliberately existed in American nuclear policy since the opening days of the Cold War. For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons, or launched a crippling cyberattack?

White House officials said that the new strategy will leave open the option of reconsidering the use of nuclear retaliation against a biological attack, if the development of such weapons reaches a level that makes United States vulnerable to a devastating strike.

Mr. Obama?s new strategy is bound to be controversial, both among conservatives who have warned against diluting America?s most potent deterrent, and among liberals who were hoping for a blanket statement that America would never be the first to use nuclear weapons.
"
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
my question is why make any statement other than, "we reserve the right to respond to any attack on america with the appropriate force that we deem necessary".....

in other words,you better think 3 times before you make the decision to f-ck with us,....

you don`t give away you`re defense stategy to your enemies...it`s insane...that`s why m.a.d. worked so well...

at what point does this administration become more concerned with deterring our enemies and keeping americans safe than reassuring our enemies?......

they aren`t stopping...anybody that thinks the russians,n.koreans,chinese,iranians are trustworthy should being wearing a white coat that has sleeves that buckle in the back.....

we`re scrapping our defense shield for poland,the czechs et al and we still can`t even get these s.o.b.`s to agree to REAL SANCTIONS against iran....

all our allies(the eastern europeans,the israelis) are getting thrown under the bus while we kiss every despot`s ass..


wtf is wrong with these morons?...this isn`t a theoretical debate in some college dormitory..you can`t turn your back on your allies and kiss the ass of your enemies "hoping" they`ll throw you a bone...

strength is the only real deterrent...

2012 can`t get here fast enough..
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top