WILD CARD

[THUNDER]

WHY I LOVE SEATLE


WASH PLAYED 3 TOP 10 D'S THIS YEAR. THEY GOT KILLED BY ALL 3. SEATLE IS NUMBER 1 IN ALMOST EVERY IMPORTANT STAT. BUT THIS IS WHERE SEATTLE EXCELS- THEY MAN UP ON WR WITH THE BEST CB TANDEM THERE IS. THEN THEY JUST COLLAPSE AND DECIMATE THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE.
RG3 IS STILL LIMPING ALONG. NOW GUESS WHO HAD THE NUMBER 1 O THE LAST 5 GAMES OF THE SEASON-BY A WIDE MARGIN- SEATTLE- NUMBER 1 O -NUMBER 1 D- PLAYING A HOBBLED ROOKIE QB THAT HAS NOT FAIRED WELL AGAINST TOP SECONDARIES-
THIS GAME IS a mismatch

 

[REDSKIN]

WHY I LOVE SEATLE


WASH PLAYED 3 TOP 10 D'S THIS YEAR. THEY GOT KILLED BY ALL 3. SEATLE IS NUMBER 1 IN ALMOST EVERY IMPORTANT STAT. BUT THIS IS WHERE SEATTLE EXCELS- THEY MAN UP ON WR WITH THE BEST CB TANDEM THERE IS. THEN THEY JUST COLLAPSE AND DECIMATE THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE.
RG3 IS STILL LIMPING ALONG. NOW GUESS WHO HAD THE NUMBER 1 O THE LAST 5 GAMES OF THE SEASON-BY A WIDE MARGIN- SEATTLE- NUMBER 1 O -NUMBER 1 D- PLAYING A HOBBLED ROOKIE QB THAT HAS NOT FAIRED WELL AGAINST TOP SECONDARIES-
THIS GAME IS a mismatch

Who were these 3 top D's that killed the Skins? I saw this team in every game that they played but one and that was in Pitt, in a game where the receivers had 11 drops, 5 in the redzone. :shrug:

 

[THUNDER]

Who were these 3 top D's that killed the Skins? I saw this team in every game that they played but one and that was in Pitt, in a game where the receivers had 11 drops, 5 in the redzone. :shrug:

TOP 3 - CINCY-PITT-ATLANTA

TEAMS IN THE TOP 15 THEY WENT 2-4

 

[REDSKIN]

All 3 games were before the bye week, Skins are 7-0 coming off of it. Playing better defense since and Garcon making the offense a little more diverse. Pitt game was ugly but they were in the Cinncy game, losing by 7 and also tied with Atlanta with under 2 and a half mins left at 17 - 17. The Atlanta game also saw RG3 out at halftime with an injury and Cousins seeing his first action of the season for the whole second half of the game, in which he threw 2 costly picks. In no way were they destroyed in that game. IMO. We also need to look at who beat Sea when they were on the road. Ariz, St Lou, Det and Miami. Only resp loss on the road was San Fran.

 

[THUNDER]

All 3 games were before the bye week, Skins are 7-0 coming off of it. Playing better defense since and Garcon making the offense a little more diverse. Pitt game was ugly but they were in the Cinncy game, losing by 7 and also tied with Atlanta with under 2 and a half mins left at 17 - 17. The Atlanta game also saw RG3 out at halftime with an injury and Cousins seeing his first action of the season for the whole second half of the game, in which he threw 2 costly picks. In no way were they destroyed in that game. IMO. We also need to look at who beat Sea when they were on the road. Ariz, St Lou, Det and Miami. Only resp loss on the road was San Fran.

ARE YOU A REDSKIN FAN?opcorn2

 

[REDSKIN]

ARE YOU A REDSKIN FAN?opcorn2

After being hit with that factual information, that's all you have for me? For sure a man of your capping stature can dispute what I just said with some facts of your own, no? Just calling me a Hoomer isn't good enough for me and I'm sure it's not good enough for some of the other Madjackers here who are looking at pulling the trigger on the Skins. Also, Atl wasn't one of the 3 teams with a defense in the top 10. That third team would be Carolina, as hard as that is to swallow.

 

[LonghornMM]

Redskin, your username says all that needs to be said. You're a "fan" and you're biased towards the Redskins. Rule #1 of sportsbetting, never bet with your heart.

 

[REDSKIN]

Redskin, your username says all that needs to be said. You're a "fan" and you're biased towards the Redskins. Rule #1 of sportsbetting, never bet with your heart.

So none of the facts I listed above are true? He said 3 teams with good D's KILLED the Skins this year, one being ATL. The Wash/ATL game I watched was tied with less than 3 mins to go with ATL scoring a late TD. No RG3 for half that game. Doesn't seem like to me that Wash was KILLED in the game. I respect Thunder prob more than anyone else on here but in this spot I'm using factual information to disagree with him on this one.

 

[Old School]

So none of the facts I listed above are true? He said 3 teams with good D's KILLED the Skins this year, one being ATL. The Wash/ATL game I watched was tied with less than 3 mins to go with ATL scoring a late TD. No RG3 for half that game. Doesn't seem like to me that Wash was KILLED in the game. I respect Thunder prob more than anyone else on here but in this spot I'm using factual information to disagree with him on this one.

and that is exactly what the board is supposed to be about.

adult discussion without name calling to cap the games..

nowhere in this thread does Redskin do anything but present another side to the disecting of the matchup.

good work..

 

[THUNDER]

So none of the facts I listed above are true? He said 3 teams with good D's KILLED the Skins this year, one being ATL. The Wash/ATL game I watched was tied with less than 3 mins to go with ATL scoring a late TD. No RG3 for half that game. Doesn't seem like to me that Wash was KILLED in the game. I respect Thunder prob more than anyone else on here but in this spot I'm using factual information to disagree with him on this one.

What facts are you speaking of?

 

[REDSKIN]

and that is exactly what the board is supposed to be about.

adult discussion without name calling to cap the games..

nowhere in this thread does Redskin do anything but present another side to the disecting of the matchup.

good work..

:toast:

 

[THUNDER]

So none of the facts I listed above are true? He said 3 teams with good D's KILLED the Skins this year, one being ATL. The Wash/ATL game I watched was tied with less than 3 mins to go with ATL scoring a late TD. No RG3 for half that game. Doesn't seem like to me that Wash was KILLED in the game. I respect Thunder prob more than anyone else on here but in this spot I'm using factual information to disagree with him on this one.

I WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK BUT WASH DOES NOT HAVE 1 ADVANTAGE THIS GAME -BUT IF I AM WRONG I AM WRONG -HAVE FUN TODAY

 

[WayUpInYa]

Thunder I don't know why you waste so much time responding to the haters and trolls, especially when they have so few posts under their belt. Ignore them and stick to winning.

What's up for 2h on the Balt game?

 

[smilin]

I don't think "Redskin" was hating. He was giving an opinion based on facts he's found.
This is easily the toughest game of the weekend to cap.
Regardless, good luck to everyone.

 

[gjn23]

I WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK BUT WASH DOES NOT HAVE 1 ADVANTAGE THIS GAME -BUT IF I AM WRONG I AM WRONG -HAVE FUN TODAY

im with you on the chickens but to say wash has no advantages is false

1) home field
2) better rushing offense (barely)
3) despite chickens outburst recently, skins actually scored more points this year (barely)

now i think 2-3 are offset by sea defense.....but that's why they play the games.

 

[THUNDER]

BALT OVER 22.5 4% 2H

 

[REDSKIN]

What facts are you speaking of?

The fact that KILLED seems to be a little much considering what really happened. Yes, Pitt won at home by 15 but send any rookie QB into Pitt and I'm sure if their receivers dropped 11 passes in the game their team would prob suffer a bad defeat too. Still I'm not sure that a 15 point loss suggests Killed. I also don't think that a 7 point loss to a Cinncy team that made the playoffs suggests Killed either. The ATL game def doesn't look like a kill job either as losing on a last min TD after playing with their rookie backup QB for a half, who never threw a reg season pass before strikes me as they were killed. Yes, they lost all 3 of the games you mentioned, I just don't see how you can say "Killed". I also stated the teams that beat Sea when they took to the road. The only one of that bunch that made the playoffs was the 49ers.

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Thunder I don't know why you waste so much time responding to the haters and trolls, especially when they have so few posts under their belt. Ignore them and stick to winning.

What's up for 2h on the Balt game?

Redskin wasn't doing anything other than responding to Thunder's reasoning, and I'm sure he appreciates posts like that (which might make him rethink his bet) versus someone that comes in simply to give him shit.

Cheers and GL everyone. :toast:

 

[BuckwheatJWN]

I think the REDSKIN fan is neither a HATER or TROLL. Just a guy offering his factually based opinion where it will get the most notice. If he had started his own THREAD "Why Thunder is wrong about the REDSKINS?" it would have quickly been moved to Mini-Dumpster. Sometimes we have to accept criticism as just a difference in opinion. Of course, i could be wrong, but it is just MY opinion. :0008

 

[REDSKIN]

Thunder I don't know why you waste so much time responding to the haters and trolls, especially when they have so few posts under their belt. Ignore them and stick to winning.

What's up for 2h on the Balt game?

I don't know what you've been reading but in no way am I hating on Thunder. Ive been around here a'lot longer than you and I can promise you I don't hate on anyone here. I will say after reading your post however, that you're the ignorant one and you prob have no business sticking your nose in here unless you're going to bring some interesting facts with you that can help us all in capping this game. To wash Thunders balls isn't enough to stick your nose in here when we're having a serious debate on a play.