World Series Thread!!!

jmizeus

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2000
7,264
2
0
western,ny
going to us this thread for the entire series -instead of posting a new on every game since there are only 2 teams left:shrug:
anyways going with the angels in the series. why-not they did beat the ny yankees :D

anaheim (-125) for the series!

GL-MIZE
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,740
58
48
Northern Wisconsin
Mize, also going with the Angels, just because I think it will be a low scoring series and I see Anaheim as being better at manufacturing runs. Angels (-106 at Pinnacle) in 7.

Good luck to everyone.:)
 

TBoyrent

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 29, 2000
642
15
18
56
Kokomo,In.
went with my gut feeling that Bonds"who I cannot stand" will get a ring this year. Giants in 6 5 to 1 at OLY.:shrug:
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
I agree that the series will be entertaining, close and go no less than six games. The Angels, though I do admit a bias, have some significant advantages. Despite Nen, the Angel pen makes most games 7 inning affairs. If they are ahead by then, they will likely close it. Another advantage mentioned above is their ability to manufacture runs. While it backfires on occasion, Scoscia continually keeps pressure on opposing oitchers and defenses by stealing, but more often by playing run and hit. Angels seldom hit into double plays and the majority of the time they will easily go from 1st to 3rd and many on this team can score from 1st if they are running and the ball is gapped. Most of the Angels can bunt and Scoscia isn't afraid to play little ball or squeeze. I think an intangible is that the Giants may feel pressured to have Bonds and Kent carry them in this series. On the other side, Angels have a new guy step up every game. Spezio, Kennedy, Glaus, Erstad, Anderson, Salmon, Eckstein - have all played the major role in Angel wins. If one or more of them goes 0-4, the balance of the squad comes forward. Don't know how Giants would react if Bonds or Kent had a poor game or series. Of course, it might not be possible for Bonds to have a bad series. But prior to this year, didn't he have a history of poor playoff performances? Well, don't know if that is accurate or even applicable as it doesn't seem like anybody can get him out this year. Whichever way the ball bounces, it should be an entertaining series.
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,740
58
48
Northern Wisconsin
Boy oh boy, so far I am very wrong in my short analysis above. The Angels have had three chances to score with a runner on third and less than two out and have not managed to get the runner in yet. Terrible at-bats by their number 2, 3 and 4 hitters. Schmidt is tough but not to be able to put the ball in play with runners at third and one out is poor hitting.
 

jmizeus

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2000
7,264
2
0
western,ny
GAME #2

anaheim (-115)
under 8' (+100)

glad to see fletcher on the same side! as for me the national league has not won back to back world series since 81-82,and with all that if the trend continues anaheim must win this game to avoid being down 2 games! that is my main reason i am backing the halos tonite!
as for the total-it is a system play for

GL-MIZE
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top