WTF Thread

LUCKY 7

Registered User
Forum Member
May 23, 2002
1,146
1
0
48
POMONA, CA
Buehrle pitching lights out and the Sox can't get a run home with runners on 2nd and 3rd with none out :mj16: Its only a matter of days for Guillen :sadwave:
 

Drew

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2005
1,660
2
0
Hendrickson is back to his old Devil Ray days. Talk about a piece of poop:nono:

Maddux surrenders a run in 1st, and Chacon being a stingy bastard with the hits so far:SIB
 

Drew

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2005
1,660
2
0
Terrific, Dodgers bring in a guy with an ERA over 16:mj07:
 

Drew

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2005
1,660
2
0
Padres have runners on 1st and 2nd, no outs, and strand the runners at 1st and 2nd?:shrug:

Nice.:nono:
 

Drew

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2005
1,660
2
0
I saw Maddux pitch out of some jams. Friggin Chacon and Woody Williams looking good tonight/:shrug:
 

Mister Covers

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2006
507
14
0
Congrats you can quit your whining now. Pittsburgh outhits San Diego 10-5 and leaves 9 on base to San Diego's 3 and San Diego wins. The square world should be happy as every square alive had them. I love these people that whine about all the bad breaks they are getting then you look at the box score or watch the game and you wonder what the hell they are talking about. They completely ignore all the runners that Pittsburgh has left on and how many more baserunners they've had on base compared to the team they have.
 
Last edited:

Mister Covers

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2006
507
14
0
Pittsburgh outhits San Diego 12-7 and loses. And the san diego bettors have been whining all ngiht. Terrible play if you had San Diego but it proves once again that good bets lose and bad bets win sometimes. Houston was easy though.
 

BleedDodgerBlue

Admin
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2004
7,383
82
0
49
los angeles
I bet the padres....maybe I'm square

what a clusterfck that last home run was...or wasnt'

instant replay says it wasn't.

they called it back and padres might not have a catcher for the bottom of the inning.

umps take a lot of slack.


gl
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
I bet the padres....maybe I'm square

what a clusterfck that last home run was...or wasnt'

instant replay says it wasn't.

they called it back and padres might not have a catcher for the bottom of the inning.

umps take a lot of slack.


gl

You will be banned from these "WTF" threads if you don't get with the program!

Bitching about good things that happened for the team you bet on is unacceptable!:nono:

:rant2: (I like that one also)
 

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
I bet the padres....maybe I'm square

what a clusterfck that last home run was...or wasnt'

instant replay says it wasn't.

they called it back and padres might not have a catcher for the bottom of the inning.

umps take a lot of slack.


gl

has anyone here seen irv???
 

Mister Covers

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2006
507
14
0
I love how all these San Diego bettors were complaining the entire game about all the "Bad breaks" they were gettiing yet Pittsburgh had twice as many hits and left over twice as many runners on base during the first nine innings. Now they are all proclaiming what a great play it was. Every square wet their pants tonight with that lucky ass play.

You will be banned from these "WTF" threads if you don't get with the program!

Bitching about good things that happened for the team you bet on is unacceptable!:nono:

:rant2: (I like that one also)
 

Mister Covers

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2006
507
14
0
78& of the bets tonight were on San Diego. That was NOT the reason for my play but everytime I get on one of these huge public plays it seems to lose. For some reason I go against them and they lose. But Joe Public, who is a square does win around 48-50% of the time.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top