YELL OH ?

[Jimboski]

Just checking to see if there's an echo.

Well, in the just completed 7th which is the first race I got to see LIVE today, the no. 7 L@@KER was the LOOKER for that race. Unfortunately, I put in my bets earlier and they did NOT include no. 7

Good news is there was enough time to bet the two (no. 4 looked a little better than the rest, but not as good as the no. 7) that drew my attention in the paddock. Bottom line is that the win bet on the 7 covered everything plus a small profit.

Terrible races today. In fact that 7th race was the FIRST race that I bet TODAY.

Just to make your trip worthwhile for now... I do have the no. 8 marked as a "lean" for the upcoming 8th race so far.

If anybody is gonna be around, chime in here and maybe WE can find another L@@KER.
If not -good luck whatever sport/track you might play today. Maybe not playing a thing is a better idea cause we always can look forward to To-mor-row, tomorrow... ♫ ♪

 

[Jimboski]

Just checked the odds and see that no. 8 is now 3-1, SOMB. was 10-1 when I bet it.

 

[Jimboski]

just some STUFF

just some STUFF

Nobody around, but I'll post what I saw/capped AFTER the race just for the record. It is a LOT easier that way; I wouldn't have had time to post anything in the last couple of minutes before that 8th race anyways.

8th race:
Mickey was gassed from his early efforts and still got 3rd. There were no lookers in the prerace but no. 9 was iffy and I played a couple of stinkin bucks on that one to win, only. Caught the show price for Mickey, but not enough to avoid finishing in the red for that race.

9th race:
Wasn't excited about anything in this race when I went over the entrees and still not. Maybe the prerace will change my mind about that, but unless I see a "10" it's gonna be small STINKIN bets from this point on.

 

[Jimboski]

Should mention that that I DID play no. 7 for this 9th already ONLY cause I wrote about that one right here in MJ's last time he ran. Anyway, him's got scwatched today.

 

[Jimboski]

Nuthin special for either one - but the no. 4 and 8 are the only ones that don't look like dirt bombs in this race (9th)

 

[Jimboski]

Looks like Hammy is around... only a couple of mins. and nos. 3 and 6 are the one's that look a little better than the rest.

G.L.

 

[Jimboski]

wrap up

wrap up

Terrible, terrible.. . two favorites run 1 and 2 in a race like this. UGH! Four more buck down the drain LOL

CarMOUCH was on the winner and I got a coment about him for our dedicated Philly Park wacin fans. :mj07:

I think there may be something up with him cause - he's was in a slump when I first started to notice, then he wasn't around for most racing days, and NOW I see his mounts are PLUS something like EIGHT lbs. over weight. :scared

Obviously, he still can ride, but I no longer give extra attention to a hoss just because he's riding it.


Just something kind of interesting:
Last Tuesday was a LUCKY one alright. Didn't post anything here cause this place was so dead. I did post ONE (and ONLY one) hoss in my other forum and it was that race that made the day a Terrific Tuesday alright cause I nailed a 3 figure zacta AND the tri for that race. The hoss won ($14 mutual) but I used it in the exotics (on top) only. BTW, that forum has a lot of folks who seem to be more interested in politics than sports and it is a "sports" forum too and that is why I posted my best bet of the day there instead of here. Oh, his name was "Change We Need".(Doesn't mean a thing about my political preference for this year's election. Fact is, the last time I saw a candidate worth voting for, hint -> he WON the election and didn't become President, WTF? Ain't the electoral college "wunderful", much like the judicial (courtwise) system we have?

Hopefully, some of the MJ hossplayers will be around tomorrow and just maybe we can make it Two Terrific Tuesdays in a row

G.L. (How bout that Federer fella?)