Of course, it's ok for the US to use WMD's/chemical weapons in our war against terrorism, in the same war we supposedly were going to disarm a country of because people are not supposed to use them against humanity.
Gee one instance of this post WW2 would be nice moron wtf are you talking about ??? ....really sniffing glue is bad for you !!!
Whether you believe Saddam had WMD's and that is why we invaded his country - the main reason we were given for going there, mind you - the simple FACT is we have not discovered any. That is a paintbrush comment, of course, there might be a story here or there (that the administration probably bought and paid for) that said we might have found something. But for you righties to say that those who merely ask to be shown the WMD's are stupid really avoid the point. Don't you think that with the intelligence machine we have that this administration could have come up with SOMETHING that proves it? Seriously, dudes, you gotta do better than that if you are going to call us stupid.
To stupid to understand that those pictures of covered vehicals going from Iraq to Syria probably had WMD's arent ya ??? :mj07: gee they only had month's to prepare for it and move it out of the country . than again their is the other 30 great reasons to remove Saddam from power but we need not go into those because the left only wants to magnifie what cannot be proven ....ya we know they moved all their cotton candy to syria right ???? god are you dumb !!! :scared
The bottom line is, with the complete lack of proof or evidence other than past usage (thanks to supply from the US, mind you...), it's kind of simple to think that Saddam could have used his STOCKPILES of WMD's to strike the US. To go from stockpiles to nopiles is a stretch, don't you think?
Gee moron the types of WMD's used in the past by Saddam our troops were prepared for plus Saddam knew he could use you morons as tools if he got them out of the country and he was 100% correct . These evil dictator types that are compleately out gunned are a lot smarter than your brain can handle . They know morons like you are their best allies and their greatest chance of survival is the Liberal and the Liberal Media types . See these people actually understand how many times the Liberals helped them throughout history IE : France and WW2 and Nam . Your merely tools for these people and great allies :cursin: You also forgot the part were the Iraqi army basically disbanded as we came in so they wouldnt die and had no moral to defend a compleate moron like Saddam to begin with . Only morons like yourself are willing to support people like Saddam and Hitler and they definately relie on it .
I think a simple question to ask Rumsfeld would be: where are the WMD's that you knew the locations of? Did our billion dollar satellite systems that took all those pictures when they supposedly there just miss the big move? Or were all of those huge stockpiles moved in that group of trucks that one day - WHEN WE WERE ALL AROUND AND IN THAT COUNTRY WITH THE SATELLITES WORKING AND WE SUPPOSEDLY KNEW WHERE THEY WERE TO BEGIN WITH.
Gee Again moron what part of all those covered vehicals going from Iraq to Syria dont you get ???? you do understand that the Ranger in my familly alone witnessed over 900 covered vehicals and that was only during his watches :cursin:
Simple logic dictates that you have to show proof of something to prove its existence. Or at least show an efffect of something on something else to show possible proof. We're not talking about years ago...we are talking about when we invaded.
I see now everybody is a US Citizen aye ? Funny you sound just like the Liberals in France that wanted proof Hitler was going to advance on them hence why they refused to bring the Magnot line around to the Belgium border ....the rest is history :scared
The inspectors were there for a very long time. They said nothing was there. They were given a lot of lattitude to look around. I'm sure they had a hard time getting everywhere, but if there were so many, I would think SOMETHING would turn up. Our satellites were taking pictures every hour on the hour, most likely. Again...nothing.
Really no need to resort to lies !! :cursin: they were giving inspectors fits and once again the fact is 1000's of satalite pictures showing covered trucks leaving in mass a day even hours before an inspection and huge delays in getting access ...you know dam well they would have been allowed to walk rt up and get immeadiate access to any where they wanted if there was nothing to hide . Plain fact of the matter is the way they were behaving before during and after an inspection only solidifies the case they were hiding things only a compleate and utter moron would see it diferent :scared
All I have ever seen as supposed proof at the time of our runup to war is the possibility that some trucks moved WMD's to Syria. If that's all you got, that's pretty sad.
Why does that seem so impossible to you ? seems pretty dam logical, in fact if it wasent the case Kaddafi could have owned Iraq being that he turned in enough WMD's to destroy Iraq . You have history and the games played during inspections as well to back this up ? Please explain to me why you feel Saddam became a kinder more gentle man ? thats really what you need to prove before anyone with half a brain would ever believe this BS
Oh, I forgot...they probably buried everything. That should be logical proof of existence. A big pile of sand in a desert and a photo of a buried jet with no missiles on it. That one probably could have flown into a building, if a Saudi Arabian terrorist got ahold of it...
No but they did bury the hundreds of thousands of men women and children :cursin:
By the way...I'm baaaaaaaack...
oke
