Gmroz, I am sorry but your answer for where Humans come from is very irrational to me. You say we eveolved from a lessor form of life, yet where does that life come from, you know as well as I do that if we keep playing this game you will be saying "i dont know where this dust came from" just like every athiest(scientist or not). So you have faith that there is no God and yet you cannot even answer how we got here. To say we evoled blah blah blah, well where did it all begin and you will say what? "I dont know". I can at least give you an answer to that question. An answer that is much more rational than the IRRATIONAL statement of saying, science is all there is, even though science has no clue of how we got here(where it all began). You think my answer is that a supernatural being created us is wrong because it does not fit in with science, even though science has no answer for the question itself. Doesnt that bother you that you are putting so much faith into something that cant answer the basic question of where we came from? Doesnt it both you that the more science finds out about life, the more unrealistic random design seems? The more science discovers how intricate a cell is and how it works the more infinite the number is getting on the odds of it all coming into place like that.
Anyways about your comments about the bible verses being divinely inspiried let me repeat. those are not God's words, those are the rules written up by the pharisees to prevent their people from getting anywhere near actually breaking God's commands. That is why Jesus(God's words) tears down many of the Pharisees rules and he goes after them more than anyone else in the New Testament.
I know the First part about the amputees didnt make sense to you because you are not getting the point I am making about God making it blatantly obvious to us so that we would no longer have any choice but to believe in Him. He does this because He wants us to have free will(same reason He allows us to Sin) and the reason why he wants us to have free will is because He loves us. We would be robots if we could not sin, we would neevr feel joy or anger or anything, we would neevr feel anything at all, because we would have no choice.
That is the same reason why God doesnt miraculously heal amputees, because it would be blatantly obvious. It is not obvious when He heals someone with cancer because you and me are having this discussion(if it were obvious you would believe in Him as well)
And you ask me is God more interested in You having faith in Him and therefore truly believing in Him and His teachings and therefore following His teachings because you know they are the best way you can live your life OR He is more interested in you trying to live your life how YOU believe it should be lived and based on YOUR interpretation of good? Well of course I choose the first one. No matter how many good deeds we all fall short of the glory of Christ. And as Christians if we believe by doing good deeds we are to get into Heaven we are taking away the sacrifice Christ made on the cross. (What good is His sacrifice If we can get into heaven with good deeds alone)
I am glad we are talking about this and honestly gmroz if I saw you at a bar in Vegas we would get along great probably. And I don't want you for one second to think that I have any ill-will towards you because you disagree with my beliefs. I really like talking to knowledgable people that have views other than my own. Having said that,
I think you have hostility towards the idea of Christianity. By saying things like "Its a joke" and "it hinders are progress as humans" You obviously seem hostile to the ideas of Christianity.
And about the part where you say I just think this way because I was told to be a Christian since I was young. I studied for 4 years of debating Christianity with relativism,athiesm,nihilism, many other view points and religions. So these ideas that you assume aren't mine (and therefore not valid, like yours seem to you) are ideas that I have thought long and hard about.
And to go back to your first response to me about "is it rational to believe in Mary with Son of God..." and you claim it is irrational. I say it is rational to believe that IF there IS a supernatural being(God) who is all powerful and created the natural rules that we live by and can bend them at his liesure, that it is perfectly rational to believe that He can bend them and have a virgin give birth to His Son. Of course what we are debating about is the "IF" there is a supernatural being part. Which seems to be the only rational answer to the question of how we came into existence. Once science answers where we came into existence, then I will change my mind. But science only deals with in terms of "natural" and you or any other scientist CANT answer that one fundamental(and I do mean it should be absolutely fundamental to your faith(which gmroz your faith happens to be science) question which is where did existence start and how?
To golferboy, I dont know why God had dinosaurs, same reason He made every other animal that went extinct or not. Really it makes no difference to my faith in God. And it is a very good question about why do "good" people who live "good" lives not make it to Heaven. Let me start off by saying you or I don't know who will be in Heaven. But "good" people are still sinners and we all fall short of the glory of God. We are all fallen, and God is merciful enough to bring us His Son and die on the cross so that all us sinners have to do is to believe that He is the Son of God and that He died for our Sins.
Anyways about your comments about the bible verses being divinely inspiried let me repeat. those are not God's words, those are the rules written up by the pharisees to prevent their people from getting anywhere near actually breaking God's commands. That is why Jesus(God's words) tears down many of the Pharisees rules and he goes after them more than anyone else in the New Testament.
I know the First part about the amputees didnt make sense to you because you are not getting the point I am making about God making it blatantly obvious to us so that we would no longer have any choice but to believe in Him. He does this because He wants us to have free will(same reason He allows us to Sin) and the reason why he wants us to have free will is because He loves us. We would be robots if we could not sin, we would neevr feel joy or anger or anything, we would neevr feel anything at all, because we would have no choice.
That is the same reason why God doesnt miraculously heal amputees, because it would be blatantly obvious. It is not obvious when He heals someone with cancer because you and me are having this discussion(if it were obvious you would believe in Him as well)
And you ask me is God more interested in You having faith in Him and therefore truly believing in Him and His teachings and therefore following His teachings because you know they are the best way you can live your life OR He is more interested in you trying to live your life how YOU believe it should be lived and based on YOUR interpretation of good? Well of course I choose the first one. No matter how many good deeds we all fall short of the glory of Christ. And as Christians if we believe by doing good deeds we are to get into Heaven we are taking away the sacrifice Christ made on the cross. (What good is His sacrifice If we can get into heaven with good deeds alone)
I am glad we are talking about this and honestly gmroz if I saw you at a bar in Vegas we would get along great probably. And I don't want you for one second to think that I have any ill-will towards you because you disagree with my beliefs. I really like talking to knowledgable people that have views other than my own. Having said that,
I think you have hostility towards the idea of Christianity. By saying things like "Its a joke" and "it hinders are progress as humans" You obviously seem hostile to the ideas of Christianity.
And about the part where you say I just think this way because I was told to be a Christian since I was young. I studied for 4 years of debating Christianity with relativism,athiesm,nihilism, many other view points and religions. So these ideas that you assume aren't mine (and therefore not valid, like yours seem to you) are ideas that I have thought long and hard about.
And to go back to your first response to me about "is it rational to believe in Mary with Son of God..." and you claim it is irrational. I say it is rational to believe that IF there IS a supernatural being(God) who is all powerful and created the natural rules that we live by and can bend them at his liesure, that it is perfectly rational to believe that He can bend them and have a virgin give birth to His Son. Of course what we are debating about is the "IF" there is a supernatural being part. Which seems to be the only rational answer to the question of how we came into existence. Once science answers where we came into existence, then I will change my mind. But science only deals with in terms of "natural" and you or any other scientist CANT answer that one fundamental(and I do mean it should be absolutely fundamental to your faith(which gmroz your faith happens to be science) question which is where did existence start and how?
To golferboy, I dont know why God had dinosaurs, same reason He made every other animal that went extinct or not. Really it makes no difference to my faith in God. And it is a very good question about why do "good" people who live "good" lives not make it to Heaven. Let me start off by saying you or I don't know who will be in Heaven. But "good" people are still sinners and we all fall short of the glory of God. We are all fallen, and God is merciful enough to bring us His Son and die on the cross so that all us sinners have to do is to believe that He is the Son of God and that He died for our Sins.