Jim Leyritz charged with DUI homicide

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
"The reasons for the rapid expansion include the 1990's free-market ideological fervor, large budget deficits for the federal and state governments and the discovery and creation of vast new reserves of "raw materials" -- prisoners. The rate for most serious crimes has been dropping or stagnant for the past 15 years, but during the same period severe repeat offender provisions and a racist "get-tough" policy on drugs have helped push the US prison population up from 300,000 to around 1.5 million during the same period. This has produced a corresponding boom in prison construction and costs, with the federal government's annual expenditures in the area, now $17 billion. In California, passage of the infamous "three strikes" bill will result in the construction of an additional 20 prisons during the next few years."

again written in 2000
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,509
2,333
113
On the course!
Somehow the government and others realized how much money could be made for locking up so many people on drug charges for such a long time.........

Notice what a big $$$$$$ business prisons have become in the last 15 years not to mention all the money made on rehab clinics...........

The whole system is out of whack............


Don't spin this now! The government isn't making anything on this! Prisons have drained cash from the public coffers from their inception, and always will.

Sure, private prisons for profit make money......they are, after all, a business. But they have been around for over 20 years now, and are still a very small fraction of the prisons out there.

Dollar for dollar, far more money is lost on prisons than is "made", I can promise you that.

To suggest the government is using prisoners to "print money" is nuts, and that is my point. You keep thinking that.......it won't bother me one bit.
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
Don't spin this now! The government isn't making anything on this! Prisons have drained cash from the public coffers from their inception, and always will.

Sure, private prisons for profit make money......they are, after all, a business. But they have been around for over 20 years now, and are still a very small fraction of the prisons out there.

Dollar for dollar, far more money is lost on prisons than is "made", I can promise you that.

To suggest the government is using prisoners to "print money" is nuts, and that is my point. You keep thinking that.......it won't bother me one bit.

All I ever said was that the privatization of the prison system has become a big business............

You are the one that asked me what I was smoking????

I have proved to you that my point was made and never did I say that the government was making a dime............I like how you try to change what I said to make your point............
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,509
2,333
113
On the course!
I'm not taking ANYTHING you said and changing it. YOU said, point blank, Somehow the government........realized how much money could be made for locking up so many people on drug charges for such a long time.........

That is a ridiculous statement.

The government dumps these contracts to privatization to "save" money, not "make" money. get your facts straight!

You want to come in here, and dredge up stats from 10 years ago, well, I'm sure if I took the time to, I could find stats to refute them.......You always can.

And you never mentioned privatization of prisons until your feet were put to the fire, so you can save that, too. "Others" is pretty much a blanket statement.

Take this to the 9-11 thread with Gregg.
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
I'm not taking ANYTHING you said and changing it. YOU said, point blank, Somehow the government........realized how much money could be made for locking up so many people on drug charges for such a long time.........

That is a ridiculous statement.

The government dumps these contracts to privatization to "save" money, not "make" money. get your facts straight!

You want to come in here, and dredge up stats from 10 years ago, well, I'm sure if I took the time to, I could find stats to refute them.......You always can.

And you never mentioned privatization of prisons until your feet were put to the fire, so you can save that, too. "Others" is pretty much a blanket statement.

Take this to the 9-11 thread with Gregg.

"What is the most profitable industry in America? Weapons, oil and computer technology all offer high rates of return, but there is probably no sector of the economy so abloom with money as the privately run prison industry."

You are an idiot...............Privatization was what I was referring to the whole time.

Anyone coming to this thread can see I proved my point with proof.

Drege up stats from 10 yrs ago???
#1.......these stats are only getting larger not smaller

WHY DONT YOU POST SOME INFO TO PROVE THAT THIS HAS NOT BECOME A BIG INDUSTRY???

LETS SEE IT.............

PROVE ME WRONG.............

IDIOT................
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,584
231
63
"the bunker"
7611648_36_1.jpg



Report: Leyritz charged with DUI homicideFormer major leaguer Jim Leyritz, who played the hero in the Yankees' 1996 World Series run, is in Broward County's Main Jail, charged with DUI homicide after a Friday morning crash in Fort Lauderdale, the Miami Herald reported on its Web site.


Jim Leyritz was being held on $11,000 bond in Broward County. (Thesmokinggun.com)
Leyritz was involved in a car accident early Friday morning in Fort Lauderdale. According to WPLG-Channel 10, Leyritz struck a car in the heart of Fort Lauderdale's Himmarshee Street bar district, and a passenger in the car Leyritz allegedly hit was ejected from the car and died at the scene.

Leyritz refused a sobriety test, WPLG-Channel 10 reported, citing police.

Leyritz was charged with two counts of drunken driving, including DUI that causes death to a human, the Herald reported, citing the jail's Web site.

Leyritz, who turned 44 on Thursday, played 11 seasons for the Yankees, Angels, Rangers, Red Sox, Padres and Dodgers. For his career, he batted .264.

Leyritz is best remembered for his 8th-inning, game-tying three-run home run in Game 4 of the 1996 World Series against the Atlanta Braves. The Yankees went on to win that game in extra innings, and won the Series four games to two.

In 2006, Leyritz admitted to using amphetamines after shoulder surgery in 2001.

he should try combing a little more skin over.....would make it look thicker....
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,509
2,333
113
On the course!
"WHY DONT YOU POST SOME INFO TO PROVE THAT THIS HAS NOT BECOME A BIG INDUSTRY???

LETS SEE IT.............

PROVE ME WRONG.............

IDIOT................


CCA's stock is sitting at the same $29 it was ten years ago, when your reports were written.

That's a real "cash cow"!
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
Corrections Corp. of America is a core holding in three of the Brazos mutual funds?Brazos Small Cap fund (BJSCX), Brazos Mid Cap fund (BJMCX), and Brazos Growth fund (BJGRX). Willems says he likes Corrections Corp. of America given its recurring revenue stream and the fact that the company has delivered upside earnings surprises over the past three quarters. "CXW can predictably provide 20% annual earnings growth,"" he says. "And considering the poor market climate we are now in, with the specter of rising interest rates and inflation, stocks like CXW offer a safe haven as they are not economically sensitive.

20% annual earnings growth????

YYZ

Yeah...........I guess thats not very profitable???

Again you have proven you have no idea what you are talking about............
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
THE PRISON BOOM PRODUCES PRISON PRIVATIZATION
1970 : 280,000 prisoners | 2000 : 2,000,000 prisoners
In the late 1960's, the US began to expand the powers of law enforcement agencies around the country, generating by the 1970's an unprecedented reliance on incarceration to treat its social, political, economic and mental health problems.

By calling new acts crimes, and by increasing the severity of sentencing for other acts, US citizens witnessed a "prison boom." Soon, prison overcrowding surpassed prison construction budgets, and politicians that had promised to build new prisons could no longer build them.

So in 1984, a number of Tennessee investors with close friends in the legislature recognized a business opportunity and formed CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA). Their plan was to use venture capital to build a new prison and -- like a hotel -- lease their beds to the state in a profit-making endeavor.

Today, nearly ten percent of US prisons and jails (meaning 200,000 prisoners) have been privatized, the three largest firms being CCA, WACKENHUT CORRECTIONS CORPORATION and CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. The federal government also contracts with them to house a growing number of undocumented immigrants and resident aliens, while some of the companies have facilities in countries outside the USA.

Correctional Corporations have amassed large political influence through government ties, lobbying power and campaign contributions, while attempting to convert the discourse of justice into the language of the marketplace. In this way, they accuse government agencies as having a monopoly on corrections, espouse the need to downsize and cut through red tape. They claim that they can run prisons more efficiently and cheaper, doing a better job and saving the taxpayers money.
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
CRITICISM OF PRIVATE OF PRISONS

At the same time, prison privatization has met severe criticism. From human rights activists to criminologists, economists, religious and community leaders and even correctional officers' unions, privatization has been accused of corruption, corrosive incentives, and a resemblance to a historically racist practice of the old confederate U.S. South: CONVICT LEASING.

Some claim that private prisons really don't save money, but like any for-profit business, attempt to maximize their own profit. This results in a reduction of essential services within the prison -- from medical care, food and clothing to staff costs and security -- at the endangerment of the public, the inmates and the staff.

Other critiques are concerned with the power and influence of for-profit prisons. At a time when much of public discourse is questioning the war-on-crime and the war-on-drugs being fought as wars, critics claim that the incentive of profit skews public discourse away from reasoned debate about viable solutions to social problems.

And finally, grasping the demographic make-up of today's prisons in the US and the history that's produced this make-up (roughly 50% African-American, 35% Latino and 15% White), the privatization of prisons threatens to re-institute a link between race and commerce that has not been seen since the 1800's.




top


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOES THE PUBLIC SECTOR "PROFIT" FROM FOR-PROFITS TOO?
There are also different ways that those who make the laws profit from the laws they make through prison privatization.

The most direct are those who own stock in private prisons, such as former Tennessee Governor and his wife, Lamar and Honey Alexander, who owned stock in the early Corrections Corporation of America. There are also those officials who are on the actual payroll of these corporations, such as Manny Aragon, the New Mexico legislator who Wackenhut hired as a lobbyist for New Mexico when they were trying to begin privatization in that state.

A third way comes from campaign contributions and political action committee moneys, through which the corporations financially reward those officials that allow private prisons in their states or jurisdictions, or who pass laws that will continue prison expansion -- public or private -- thus expanding the resource base of the privatization industry. (These are often the same law makers who are handsomely rewarded by public sector groups such as correctional officers' unions and other law enforcement groups, who also profit from criminalization and mass imprisonment).

Less directly, the privatization of prisons contributes to and buoys the overall "culture" of law enforcement and criminal justice, one that levels our common sense understanding of the causes of our social problems and puts as their solution responses of violence, force and containment. By expanding the criminal justice system beyond the grasp of elected officials and civil servants, private prisons grow this culture in ways that are both ideological and practice-related.

The private sector also serves as a "career alternative" for many, hiring bureaucrats and officials from the public sector who are either looking for a raise and stock options, or are looking to come out of retirement. These include people from the FBI, CIA, various state and federal departments of corrections, sheriffs, and even former attorney generals.

And most importantly, public officials profit from prison privatization as it allows them to act with less accountability to the public, allowing prisons to be built without passing prison bonds for the public to vote on, and not having to worry how one will budget their inflammatory and expensive tough-on-crime rhetoric.



Louisiana State Secretary of Corrections, Richard Stalder, cuts the ribbon to kick off the burgeoning 1999 American Correctional Association Trade Show.

top



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOES THIS MEAN THE PUBLIC PROFITS FROM PRIVATIZATION?
Although the predominant myths about PRIVATIZATION (whether of prisons or anything else) claim that privatization means tax savings for the public, it actually costs us more. Even though on paper a private agency or corporation may present a lower figure to do the same job, once that money has been taken out of the public's hands, it no longer remains ours.

In the public sector, tax money tends to make more of itself, meaning that each public dollar paid through one social service will spend itself four to eight times more elsewhere within the public sector. Once public money goes into private hands however, that money stays there and is gone for good. This is especially true if we consider that privatization corporations are usually given handsome tax breaks and "incentives," in the form of what some people call "corporate welfare," which means we are even less likely to see that money again.

And finally, if we remember that the people who privatize are generally wealthy, this reminds us of an old story where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer -- where the hard earned tax money from each of us is funneled into the hands of the wealthy few for their own personal gain. While we each like to think we don't live in a society like that, today this is justified to us through the myth that "free markets" are the same thing as democracy; that if everything is privatized and ruled by the law of the dollar then democracy will be ensured.

Add this to the fact that prisons do not make us safer and are by far the most expensive way of dealing with what we call "crime," we suffer other costs as well. Social costs of broken families and communities -- of both victims and perpetrators; hidden financial costs like paying for the foster care of prisoners' children; what we will only pay again when a prisoner re-emerges more desperate, addicted, uneducated and disenfranchised than they went in; the vengeance our society seeks through prisons and punishment will cost us twice the price of ensuring true equality, opportunity and social health at the roots of our society.

The PRIVATIZATION OF PRISONS is but one case in which a few people exploit our society's larger problems for their own gain, at a cost we all bare and get little in return.







top of page
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
And finally, if we remember that the people who privatize are generally wealthy, this reminds us of an old story where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer -- where the hard earned tax money from each of us is funneled into the hands of the wealthy few for their own personal gain.


Lets see YYZ............why dont you tell everyone here why WEALTHY people would be involved and interested in something (prisons) that doesnt make money..............


I think I have more than proved my point.............
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
Private Prisons Expect a Boom
Immigration enforcement to benefit detention companies
By Meredith Kolodner, July 26, 2006
Reprinted with permission from the July 19, 2006 New York Times

As the Bush administration gets tougher on illegal immigration and increases its spending on enforcement, some of the biggest beneficiaries may be the companies that have been building and running private prisons around the country.

By the fall of 2007, the administration expects that about 27,500 immigrants will be in detention each night, an increase of 6,700 over the current number in custody. At the average cost these days of $95 a night, that adds up to an estimated total annual cost of nearly $1 billion.

The Corrections Corporation of America and the Geo Group (formerly the Wackenhut Corrections Corporation) -- the two biggest prison operators -- now house a total of fewer than 20 percent of the immigrants in detention. But along with several smaller companies, they are jockeying for a bigger piece of the growing business.


The government plans to detain more immigrants while they await their hearings, instead of releasing them on their own recognizance. This effort means that more capacity is required immediately -- a need being met by private prison firms (AP photo).

Corrections Corp. and Geo are already running 8 of the 16 federal detention centers.

With all the federal centers now filled and the federal government not planning to build more, most of the new money is expected to go to private companies or to county governments. Even some of the money paid to counties, which currently hold 57 percent of the immigrants in detention, will end up in the pockets of the private companies, since they manage a number of the county jails.

''Private companies are positioning themselves as suppliers, and are positioned to take the majority of new beds available,'' said Anton High, an analyst with Jefferies & Company, the brokerage firm. He has recommended that his clients buy Corrections stock.

Louise Gilchrist, vice president for marketing and communication at Corrections Corp., said her company would have no trouble meeting the federal government's needs. ''We believe as their demand increases, they will need to rely on providers who have bed space available,'' she said. ''The company feels it is well positioned.''

Wall Street has taken notice of the potential growth in the industry. The stock of Corrections Corp. has climbed to $53.77 from $42.50, an increase of about 27 percent, since February when President Bush proposed adding to spending on immigrant detention.

Geo's stock rose about 68 percent in the period, to $39.24 a share from $23.36.

The increasing privatization of immigrant detention has its critics. Immigrant advocates say health care at some centers has fallen short. They contend that some centers have treated immigrants as if they are criminals -- restricting their movements unnecessarily, for instance -- even though many are still awaiting a ruling on their legal status.

Because those who cross the border illegally are not considered criminals, they are not automatically assigned a lawyer. But, the advocates say, there have been repeated instances when immigrants have not had access to working phones to call for legal assistance.

''Private prisons have unleashed an entrepreneurial spirit in this country that is unhealthy,'' said Judith Greene, director of the nonprofit research group Justice Strategies. ''Standards are violated on a regular basis in order to cut costs.''

The companies counter that they are living up to their contractual obligations. ''If you develop a reputation as a company that cuts corners, you will lose your contracts,'' said Steve Owen, director of marketing at Corrections. The allegations, he added, ''are completely false.''

Immigration experts say the need for more prison space is not a result of an increase in the number of people entering the United States illegally. According to the Pew Hispanic Center in Washington, the number of unauthorized immigrants arriving in this country is down by about 50,000 a year from the late 1990's.

Instead, the increase in spending on detention is part of a crackdown on illegal residents living in the United States as well as an expected increase in the number of immigrants captured as they try to cross the border.

The government also plans to detain more immigrants, especially those from countries other than Mexico, while they await their hearings, instead of releasing them on their own recognizance. This effort to end what is known as "catch and release" means more capacity is needed immediately.

"The issue is not how many immigrants," said Joe Onek, a senior policy analyst at the Open Society Institute. "There's incredible pressure on the administration from members of its own party and from some sectors of the population to crack down."

Revenues for the prison management companies will grow not only because of the rising number of detainees, but also because profit margins are higher at detention centers than prisons, analysts say.

Last year, the Correction Corp.'s revenue from holding immigrants jumped 21 percent, to $95 million from $70 million in 2004. Geo, the second largest prison operator, received $30.6 million last year, about the same as the year before.

While the companies would not comment on profit margins from their immigration business, Wall Street analysts said that detention centers produce profit margins of more than 20 percent.

That compares with margins in the mid-teens for traditional prison management, they said, because prisoners are provided with more costly services like high school degree programs and recreational activities.

Even with the expected growth in the number of immigrant detainees, the main source of income for the private prison companies will continue to be revenue from state and federal governments for housing regular inmates.


Corrections Corporation of America, a private firm that operates prisons like this one in California City, Ca., saw its revenue from holding immigrants jump to $95 million in 2005 from $70 million the year before (AP photo).

The state and local prison population totaled more than 1.5 million last year, with about 100,000 of those held in privately managed prisons. But the number of state and federal inmates rose by just 1.4 percent from June 2004 to June 2005, slower growth than the average 4.3 percent annual increases from 1995 to 2000.

By contrast, the number of immigrants in detention is expected to increase by about 20 percent over the next three months alone.

Federal immigration contracts generated about $95.2 million, or 8 percent, of Correction Corp.'s $1.19 billion in revenue last year, and about $30.6 million, or 5 percent, of Geo's $612 million total income.

In the first quarter of 2006, Corrections Corp.'s detention revenue rose to $25.5 million. The federal immigration agency is now the company's third-largest customer, after the federal Bureau of Prisons and the United States Marshals Service.

The detention market is projected to increase by $200 million to $250 million over the next 12 to 18 months, according to Patrick Swindle, a managing director at Avondale L.L.C., an investment banking firm that has done business with both Geo and Corrections Corp. He said that a company's capacity would play an important role in how much of the market it would be able to capture.

The company "currently has 4,000 empty beds in their system," Mr. Swindle said. "They are bringing on an additional 1,500 beds within the border region."

"Reasonably, about 3,000 to 4,000 beds could be made available" for immigrant detention, he said.

Having empty cell space that can be made available quickly is considered an advantage in the industry since the government's need for prison space is often immediate and unpredictable. Decisions about where to detain an immigrant are based on what is nearby and available. Immigration officials consider the logistics and cost of transportation to the detention center and out of the country.

"We can use the beds whenever and wherever we like," said Jamie Zuieback, a spokeswoman for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "We are funded for a certain number of beds but there are many beds around the country that are available and it depends where and when we need them if we use them."

While companies do not release how much space they currently have available, analysts estimate that Geo has about 1,500 empty places. To increase capacity, the company announced in June that it was building a 576-inmate expansion of the 875-inmate Val Verde Correctional Facility it owns in Del Rio, Tex.

George C. Oley, Geo's chief executive, said in a statement at the time of the Val Verde announcement: "We are moving forward with the expansion of this important facility in anticipation of the expected increased demand for detention bed space by the Federal Government."

Despite the two companies' dominance, they face competition from smaller players in the corrections business. A new federal detention center set to open in Texas at the end of July will be run by the Management and Training Corporation, a privately owned company based in Utah.

The Cornell Companies, based in Texas, currently operates two centers that hold detainees. It is the third-biggest private corrections company, though significantly smaller than Corrections Corp. and Geo, controlling just 7 or 8 percent of the market, according to Mr. Swindle.

"What's great about the detention business," Mr. High of Jefferies said, "is not that it's a brand-new channel of demand, but that it is growing and significant."

Of course not according to expert YYZ....:142smilie
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,509
2,333
113
On the course!
From your July 19, 2006 piece:

Wall Street has taken notice of the potential growth in the industry. The stock of Corrections Corp. has climbed to $53.77 from $42.50, an increase of about 27 percent, since February when President Bush proposed adding to spending on immigrant detention.

Geo's stock rose about 68 percent in the period, to $39.24 a share from $23.36.


The stocks at today's closing:

CXW....... $29.38

GEO....... $28.00


Wall Street must be taking notice of the vast amount of lawsuits being won against these guys, too.


Oh, nice of you to change the rules again, BTW. Now, you want to toss in the figures from their detention centers as well? Might as well incorporate the whole ball of wax, and include private security, too!

Look..........Do these guys turn a buck? I'm sure they do to some extent, but let's not keep pretending the government is in the business of locking up guys at a record pace to keep the CEOs of CCA and GEO rich. That's fuking ridiculous.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,576
1,874
113
70
home
YANK DROVE WITH NIXED LICENSE

VICTIM'S PALS RIP LEYRITZ AS 'A KNOWN DRUNK'

By LISA LUCAS in Delray Beach, Fla., SAMUEL GOLDSMITH in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and DAN MANGAN in New York
NY POST

January 2, 2008 -- Ex-Yankee home-run hero Jim Leyritz was driving with a suspended license when he allegedly got drunk and smashed into a car driven by a mother of two, killing her, motor vehicle records reveal.
Leyritz, 44, had his Florida driver's license suspended by New York authorities on Nov. 23, according to a New York Department of Motor Vehicles database.

The license was suspended because he failed to answer a motor vehicle summons issued to him in upstate Guilderland, near Albany. Information about the nature of the summons was not available.

Because states honor each other's motor vehicle licensing, New York's suspension meant that Leyritz was not allowed to drive in Florida, or anywhere else, according to James Lowy, a Florida lawyer not connected to Leyritz's case.

Lowy said that if Florida authorities learn that Leyritz was aware his license was suspended, he could face another year in prison on top of the 15-year maximum term he faces if convicted. He is charged with manslaughter while driving under the influence and DUI property damage in the early morning smash-up that killed Fredia Ann Veitch in Fort Lauderdale.

Leyritz's attorney, Jeff Ostrow, declined to comment on the suspended license.

The Post revealed yesterday that Leyritz had since 2002 racked up at least seven motor vehicle violations in Florida. Those violations included two citations for ignoring stops signs, and another for driving with a suspended license.

A gal pal said Leyritz was drinking Grey Goose vodka tonics to celebrate his birthday Thursday night at Fort Lauderdale nightclub Automatic Slims. Afterward, he allegedly blew through a red light in his SUV before hitting a Mitsubishi Montero driven by Veitch, who was headed home after a late shift.

Cops said he reeked of alcohol and failed field sobriety tests. In 2006, he admitted to illegally using amphetamines and human growth hormone as a player.

The Davie, Fla., resident, who is best known for blasting a key three-run home run in the 1996 World Series, remains free on bond.

Meanwhile, co-workers of the dead woman yesterday said Leyritz was notorious for getting bombed while boozing in the Fort Lauderdale bar where Veitch, 30, worked as a bartender.

"I can't tell you how many times he was escorted out of the bar by the cops because that's how much of a drunk he is," said Ingrid Mahabir, a waitress at the Original Steakhouse and Sports Theater.

A bartender there, who recalled both herself and Veitch serving Leyritz drinks in the past, said, "He's a known drunk around here."

Veitch "was a beautiful person, she was the sweetest girl," Mahabir said.

But she said Leyritz, who "used to come in all the time" to the Original Steakhouse, "was an arrogant son of a bitch."

Mahabir said her bar is a hangout for off-duty cops, who sometimes escorted Leyritz out after he over-imbibed, and who told stories about him haughtily saying, "Don't you know who I am?" when they pulled him over for traffic violations.

"He had attitude," said Ernest Miller, a masseuse who has had Leyritz and his ex-wife, Karrie, as clients.

"Since he got divorced, apparently he began acting like a party animal, acting like a kid," Miller said.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,509
2,333
113
On the course!
Meanwhile, co-workers of the dead woman yesterday said Leyritz was notorious for getting bombed while boozing in the Fort Lauderdale bar where Veitch, 30, worked as a bartender.

"I can't tell you how many times he was escorted out of the bar by the cops because that's how much of a drunk he is," said Ingrid Mahabir, a waitress at the Original Steakhouse and Sports Theater.

A bartender there, who recalled both herself and Veitch serving Leyritz drinks in the past, said, "He's a known drunk around here."



There is some poetic irony.........

Feel free to serve they guy well past his "having too many", because you are turning a buck. Then he takes YOU out?????? Now, that's rich!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top