The Lawyers Party

Keeko

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2008
932
1
0
Chicago
The Lawyers Party

I never have looked at it this way. Interesting

The Democrat Party has become the Lawyers Party. Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton are lawyers.

Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama are lawyers. John Edwards, the other former Democrat candidate for president, is a lawyer, and so is his wife, Elizabeth. Every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate). Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Look at the Democrat Party in Congress: the Majority Leader in each house is a lawyer.

The Republican Party is different. President Bush and Vice President Cheney were not lawyers, but businessmen. The leaders of the Republican Revolution were not lawyers. Newt Gingrich was a history professor; Tom Delay was an exterminator; and, Dick Armey was an economist. House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer, not a lawyer. The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon. Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting pre sident, running against Ronald Reagan in 1976.

The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work. The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.

Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick, like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history, like Gingrich. The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want and need, as the enemies of America. And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, grow.

Against whom does Hillary and Obama rail? Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses like WalMart, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.

This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers. Lawyers try to solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people, as protagonists to those in the business world.

Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side. Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine, but in general it is destructive to our society and an awful way to govern a great nation.

When politicians as lawyers begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming. Some Americans become 'adverse parties' of our very government.

We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.

Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions that create law instead of enforcing laws already on the books; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big.

When lawyers use criminal prosecution as a continuation of politics by other means, as happened in the lynching of Scooter Libby and Tom Delay, then the power of lawyers in America is too great. When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing. We cannot expect the Lawyers P arty to provide real change, real reform, or real hope in America.

Most Americans know that a republic in which every major government action must be blessed by nine unelected judges is not what Washington intended in 1789. Most Americans grasp that we cannot fight a war when ACLU lawsuits snap at the heels of our defenders. Most Americans intuit that more lawyers and judges will not restore declining moral values or spark the spirit of enterprise in our economy.

Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.....but perhaps not. In that case, may God have mercy on us.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Bush was a business man? Hey Keeko, could you point me to some of great business successes?

why have a Lawyer when you can have a guy you feel you might have a beer with someday? How much was those deficits soaring with those lawyers again?:shrug:
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,483
157
63
Bowling Green Ky
--might add largest PAC contribtor to Dem party is
ATLA ( The Association of Trial Lawyers of America)
--but would have thought that and the candidates issue would have been common knowledge:shrug:
 

redsfann

ale connoisseur
Forum Member
Aug 3, 1999
9,193
362
83
60
Somewhere in Corn Country
Bush was a business man? Hey Keeko, could you point me to some of great business successes?

My thoughts exactly. Bush only has money because daddy got him a share in the Rangers which the partners(including Jr.) then sold for a HUGE profit.
If W had to actually earn a living on his own, he'd be sleeping under a highway bridge....
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I don't care if the prez is a used car salesman. Who maybe a lawyer these days. You take work where you can. Just be able to speak. After all when he talks here or around the world he speaks for us all. This last guy Jr, so Sad. You just have to guess what he said.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,483
157
63
Bowling Green Ky
Good question. DTB care to answer?
Have answered it numerous times before-its obvious that if he contibutes more to charity than Clinton/ Kerry earned pre politics combined he's
A: doing something right--
B: they were worthless
:shrug:

Now back to topic--you have any reason why all Dem candidates are lawyers?
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
in the democrat`s mind,all financially successful people are criminals....

except lawyers.. ....(yes, the aclu types and the shady wahabbist gitmo quislings)....

why?...cause these ticks have their trecherous oily, anti-american fingers in every aspect of undermining the country...


oh..sorry...and "celebrities"...

.throw them in with the other turncoats and self-loathers in the potty section...

isn`t it strange that those that owe the country the most provide the least(in actual substance)......

ecccchhhhhhh!
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Have answered it numerous times before-its obvious that if he contibutes more to charity than Clinton/ Kerry earned pre politics combined he's
A: doing something right--
B: they were worthless
:shrug:

Now back to topic--you have any reason why all Dem candidates are lawyers?

That is not an answer to the question. You called Bush a businessman now please tell us what business he ever ran that was successful?
 

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
Bush only has money because daddy got him a share in the Rangers which the partners(including Jr.) then sold for a HUGE profit.

I don't know what anyone else's take on being a businessman is.. but this seems like a pretty smart business thing to be doing.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top