wouldnt the argument then be, from the would be #9, and 10 teams, questioning the validity of who deserves to be the 8th seed>?
OU is Apparently In
- Thread starter Sun Tzu
- Start date
wouldnt the argument then be, from the would be #9, and 10 teams, questioning the validity of who deserves to be the 8th seed>?
I do understand and I think its a huge mess. I think Texas has every much of a right to play next week as TXTech and OK. It sucks.
I think the biggest thing is that why did Texas get leapfrog'd when all they've done is win and win big. I think they got jumped when Okla won big over TT and they did not play that week.
As much arguing as we've done, the whole thing is a crock and it really is a "mythical" national championship. Sad thing is, its all we got.
I think the biggest thing is that why did Texas get leapfrog'd when all they've done is win and win big. I think they got jumped when Okla won big over TT and they did not play that week.
As much arguing as we've done, the whole thing is a crock and it really is a "mythical" national championship. Sad thing is, its all we got.
tball, is it really that big a deal? I hate when people use that logic. I mean, my god, if we let 117 teams into the playoff, wouldn't people complain about who should be 117th and 118th....
I think with 8 teams, you make sure to get the top 4-6 teams in and anyone who is not one of those doesn't really have a leg to stand on.
The whole system would need to be tweaked. No coaches poll determining things and teams like Boise or Utah might have to join a better conference or just accept that going unbeaten might not get them in.
Maybe USC too. ZING!
I think with 8 teams, you make sure to get the top 4-6 teams in and anyone who is not one of those doesn't really have a leg to stand on.
The whole system would need to be tweaked. No coaches poll determining things and teams like Boise or Utah might have to join a better conference or just accept that going unbeaten might not get them in.
Maybe USC too. ZING!
hey, i agree completely
hey, i agree completely
i absoluetly have no problem with near any form of a playoff system--truly. i agree. nothings perfect, no doubt, though this isnt them trying to be perfect now, so why not change it---the obvious answer being money behind the scenes.
more than the present championship game, i tired of the amount of bowls and hearing a mediocre teams fighting for whatever (6 or 7 th win) to make bowl eligable. theres too many bowls. not that i dont mind the action options, --cuz theres always a full bowl card to choose from--though takes away from the intensity of it all i think.
i would gladly give up most of these lesser bowls in exhcnage for less action to choose from, in onrder to make more a thing to cherish getting into--as some teams backslide at end of yr and clearly dont look forward to playing anywhere
thats just me though
hey, i agree completely
i absoluetly have no problem with near any form of a playoff system--truly. i agree. nothings perfect, no doubt, though this isnt them trying to be perfect now, so why not change it---the obvious answer being money behind the scenes.
more than the present championship game, i tired of the amount of bowls and hearing a mediocre teams fighting for whatever (6 or 7 th win) to make bowl eligable. theres too many bowls. not that i dont mind the action options, --cuz theres always a full bowl card to choose from--though takes away from the intensity of it all i think.
i would gladly give up most of these lesser bowls in exhcnage for less action to choose from, in onrder to make more a thing to cherish getting into--as some teams backslide at end of yr and clearly dont look forward to playing anywhere
thats just me though
I think some of the computer systems put an emphasis on who each team loses to (Oklahoma to #3 Texas, and Texas to #7 Texas Tech) and also road victories against quality opponents (Texas has none, Oklahoma against #14 Oklahoma St.):shrug:
