27 pay periods in 2010 if you are paid biweekly on Fridays

redsfann

ale connoisseur
Forum Member
Aug 3, 1999
9,193
362
83
60
Somewhere in Corn Country
I have worked there for 31.6 weeks (31 weeks and 3 days)as of the end of this year. My w-2 for this year will compensate me for 29.6 weeks. My 2010 salary is not in question, as I will be paid 1/27th of my salary 27 times.


I will be shorted 2 weeks of pay in 2009. I do not need to look at my w-2, because I am holding my last direct deposit pay stub of the year right now.

So what is the check on 1/1/10 for? Are you getting paid in advance for work you haven't done yet?
 

TheSportsPredictor

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 13, 2001
402
0
0
You'll be fully compensated for your work from 1/1/10 to 12/31/10.

Don't know what days you'll receive it all, but if you work it you'll receive the dough.
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
Give me a call when you have a chance. If that pay on 12/31/2010 is your last pay for 2010 wages/work than you do have a gripe.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,715
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
It sounds like this is beneficial from a tax standpoint and your pay's not affected , but I defer to Poon who is an expert in payroll and related taxes and can reconcile many different types of bank statements. . .
 

safrank99

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 20, 2006
563
1
0
43
Dyer, IN
It just appears to me you aren't being shorted at all in the grand scheme of things.

Your losing a check on your 2009 payscale because you get paid on 1/1/2010 and getting paid an extra check on the 2010 which means its equal.
 

Agent 0659

:mj07:
Forum Member
Dec 21, 2003
17,712
243
0
51
Gym rat
It just appears to me you aren't being shorted at all in the grand scheme of things.

Your losing a check on your 2009 payscale because you get paid on 1/1/2010 and getting paid an extra check on the 2010 which means its equal.

Except his 2010 checks are all less since it's divided by 27
 

UGA12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2003
7,774
108
63
Between The Hedges
So your saying you had 25 pay periods instead of 26 in 09 and will have 27 in 10:shrug: If that is what you are saying then yes it would seem your getting screwed.
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Give me a call when you have a chance. If that pay on 12/31/2010 is your last pay for 2010 wages/work than you do have a gripe.

Thanks, Poon. I got your text and will give you a quick buzz tomorrow. I would like to briefly discuss w/ an expert prior to meeting w/ brass early next week.


Thanks to all for your input........... except for the King of Morans, that is.
 
Last edited:

Woodson

L I V I N
Forum Member
Oct 23, 1999
15,508
79
48
Blockchain
So your saying you had 25 pay periods instead of 26 in 09 and will have 27 in 10:shrug: If that is what you are saying then yes it would seem your getting screwed.

Clarity. Agreed. I asked last week and then they sent a company wide memo regarding the last pay period of 09 being on the 31st.

First day of the year is a paid holiday..kurby

Starting the year off great!
 

ppabart

Not banned
Forum Member
Dec 13, 2000
18,259
150
63
48
Decatur, GA USA
none
I need to reread this thread once i've had a few more beers......and after a visit to Always Prayen's house. Then it'll all be clear :)

This makes me thankful I'm on bi-monthly pay
 

BADTODABONE

MM 82
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2003
5,191
29
48
70
Islamorada, FL
max_baer_jethro_bodine.jpg


Let's do some 'cyphering'.....

12 months in a year...

52 weeks in a year...

26 bi-weekly's, 52 weeks in 12 month year...

Depending on the pay date, only 25 in year A and 27 in year B

25 + 27 = cyphering the 5 & 7 carry the one to the 2+2 = 52 divided by 2 = 26 bi-weekly paydays over a 2 year period.

It seems so simple.
 

UGA12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2003
7,774
108
63
Between The Hedges
max_baer_jethro_bodine.jpg


Let's do some 'cyphering'.....

12 months in a year...

52 weeks in a year...

26 bi-weekly's, 52 weeks in 12 month year...

Depending on the pay date, only 25 in year A and 27 in year B

25 + 27 = cyphering the 5 & 7 carry the one to the 2+2 = 52 divided by 2 = 26 bi-weekly paydays over a 2 year period.

It seems so simple.


Lets assume he makes 100000 a year. He was supposed to be paid on 26 weeks this year which is 3846 biweekly. He was only paid 25 weeks at this number and instead will have 27 checks of 3703 coming in 10. (3703 X 27) + (3846 X 25)= 196150. It should equal 200000 if it is so simple no:shrug:
 
Last edited:

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,739
245
63
54
BG, KY, USA
if you are paid in a salaried fashion, why are they paying you biweekly? Shouldn't you be paid on the 1st and 15th or just once a month?

I don't think you're getting screwed here either, but interested to hear what the HR guy says next week.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top