Lets assume he makes 100000 a year. He was supposed to be paid on 26 weeks this year which is 3846 biweekly. He was only paid 25 weeks at this number and instead will have 27 checks of 3703 coming in 10. (3703 X 27) + (3846 X 25)= 196150. It should equal 200000 if it is so simple no:shrug:
There is NEVER a situtation where you have 25 pay periods in a year. Every year has 52 weeks, for Christ's sake! :mj07:
If this is such a hardship for this business's payroll dept......they should probably fire that crew!
How about changing payday to the 1st and 15th? You will never run into this problem again!
Because it does happen about every five years or so........
I have worked there for 31.6 weeks (31 weeks and 3 days)as of the end of this year. My w-2 for this year will compensate me for 29.6 weeks. My 2010 salary is not in question, as I will be paid 1/27th of my salary 27 times.
I will be shorted 2 weeks of pay in 2009. I do not need to look at my w-2, because I am holding my last direct deposit pay stub of the year right now.
This is where the big problem is: He talks about being "short two weeks pay", but the check he will get on 1-1-10 will represent work from 2009! The first check of the year almost ALWAYS DOES!
I find it hard to believe the company isn't making their adjustments after that. :shrug:
If that's not the case........it does sound goofy.
Last edited: