Please Ignore Everybody
Please Ignore Everybody
Just keep posting your plays . . . Some of us appreciate it!!!
Please Ignore Everybody
Just keep posting your plays . . . Some of us appreciate it!!!
WE ARE ALL LOSING AND HAVING FUN DOING IT FUNNY YOU ACCUSE A COUPLE THING I ANSWER YOUR BULL AND YOU DONT ANSWER YOU WONT BUY A HALF POINT BUT YOU WILL LAY -180-220 ON A GOLFER -AND NOT ONE BUT 4-6 IN A DAY YOU ARE A BOOKS WET DREAM
And now back to Thunder's regularly scheduled thread! More games please! This "lemming" wants to lose all of my money! I've got lots of it and besides following Thunder's plays, I might start using some of it to hire a hit man to track down all of the dumbasses who crowd this man's thread with BS!!!![]()
I don't ever recall Thunder advising anybody to wager a single farthing on any game.
He posts his plays.
What's unethical is assuming he buys plays, posts bad lines and "advises" people to bet their whole bankroll.
I've been popping into his threads for about 5 years and I guess there's a reason I (and many others) keep coming back.
Eat my bag.
well said!THUNDER
Please ignore the haters and continue doing your thing. There are a lot of us that value you tremendously
Cheers
:00x1
Buying points and betting on a golf matchup are two different things. Buying points is a negative proposition over the long term in college hoops. That is a fact.
When you find a matchup in golf or anything that you have handicapped to win 75% of the time, it is a wise decision to bet it at anything less than -300. You see that would be a positive proposition over the long term.
I was not dodging your question. I do find it funny that you compare buying points to a matchup wager. I guess you have been at this a long time.
Buying points and betting on a golf matchup are two different things. Buying points is a negative proposition over the long term in college hoops. That is a fact.
When you find a matchup in golf or anything that you have handicapped to win 75% of the time, it is a wise decision to bet it at anything less than -300. You see that would be a positive proposition over the long term.
I was not dodging your question. I do find it funny that you compare buying points to a matchup wager. I guess you have been at this a long time.
ANY WAGER HOCKY BASEBALL GOLF OVER 130 IS STUPID PLAIN AND SIMPLE
But playing 40+ games and risking over 100% of your bankroll is smart?
Its really useless. We will have to see who is still around in three months or so.
Its really useless. We will have to see who is still around in three months or so.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.