the u.s. middle class is being wiped out

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,245
1,635
113
70
home
The 22 statistics detailed here prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence in America.

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer at a staggering rate. Once upon a time, the United States had the largest and most prosperous middle class in the history of the world, but now that is changing at a blinding pace.

So why are we witnessing such fundamental changes? Well, the globalism and "free trade" that our politicians and business leaders insisted would be so good for us have had some rather nasty side effects. It turns out that they didn't tell us that the "global economy" would mean that middle class American workers would eventually have to directly compete for jobs with people on the other side of the world where there is no minimum wage and very few regulations. The big global corporations have greatly benefited by exploiting third world labor pools over the last several decades, but middle class American workers have increasingly found things to be very tough.

Here are the statistics to prove it:

? 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
? 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
? 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
? 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.
? A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.
? 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.
? Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.
? Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.
? For the first time in U.S. history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together.
? In 1950, the ratio of the average executive's paycheck to the average worker's paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.
? As of 2007, the bottom 80 percent of American households held about 7% of the liquid financial assets.
? The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation?s wealth.
? Average Wall Street bonuses for 2009 were up 17 percent when compared with 2008.
? In the United States, the average federal worker now earns 60% MORE than the average worker in the private sector.
? The top 1 percent of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America's corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.
? In America today, the average time needed to find a job has risen to a record 35.2 weeks.
? More than 40 percent of Americans who actually are employed are now working in service jobs, which are often very low paying.
? or the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.
? This is what American workers now must compete against: in China a garment worker makes approximately 86 cents an hour and in Cambodia a garment worker makes approximately 22 cents an hour.
? Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 - the highest rate in 20 years.
? Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
? The top 10 percent of Americans now earn around 50 percent of our national income.

Giant Sucking Sound

The reality is that no matter how smart, how strong, how educated or how hard working American workers are, they just cannot compete with people who are desperate to put in 10 to 12 hour days at less than a dollar an hour on the other side of the world. After all, what corporation in their right mind is going to pay an American worker 10 times more (plus benefits) to do the same job? The world is fundamentally changing. Wealth and power are rapidly becoming concentrated at the top and the big global corporations are making massive amounts of money. Meanwhile, the American middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence as U.S. workers are slowly being merged into the new "global" labor pool.

What do most Americans have to offer in the marketplace other than their labor? Not much. The truth is that most Americans are absolutely dependent on someone else giving them a job. But today, U.S. workers are "less attractive" than ever. Compared to the rest of the world, American workers are extremely expensive, and the government keeps passing more rules and regulations seemingly on a monthly basis that makes it even more difficult to conduct business in the United States.

So corporations are moving operations out of the U.S. at breathtaking speed. Since the U.S. government does not penalize them for doing so, there really is no incentive for them to stay.

What has developed is a situation where the people at the top are doing quite well, while most Americans are finding it increasingly difficult to make it. There are now about six unemployed Americans for every new job opening in the United States, and the number of "chronically unemployed" is absolutely soaring. There simply are not nearly enough jobs for everyone.

Many of those who are able to get jobs are finding that they are making less money than they used to. In fact, an increasingly large percentage of Americans are working at low wage retail and service jobs.

But you can't raise a family on what you make flipping burgers at McDonald's or on what you bring in from greeting customers down at the local Wal-Mart.

The truth is that the middle class in America is dying -- and once it is gone it will be incredibly difficult to rebuild.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
166
63
Bowling Green Ky
I saw this Jack and on a few- like 1st fact would like to know how they arrived at that # especially in light of institutional investing on 401K's etc.

For the rest--go line by line and ask yourself--is this result of middle class declining or poor increasing.

or another way of putting it--when they put the 13 million illegals on healthcare and give them amnesty--the #'s will be worse yet--not because middle class will decrease but because the % will diluted by the indigent.

--would be curious who author is per their walmart bs at end--lots of employees raise familys--also on children living in poverty--he might have added poverty level for family of 4 is $22,000--our idea of poverty is far from idea of rest of world.

Our ave home having mulitiple phones and 2.93 tv's.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
I just see where article originated--Business Insider--
I noted previously that this publication is not to be confused with similiar sounding pubs.

It originated in 2009--:SIB
Business Insider

<!-- /firstHeading --><!-- bodyContent --><!-- tagline -->From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<!-- /tagline --><!-- subtitle -->


The Business Insider is a business news site launched in February 2009. It is the overarching brand beneath which fall the Silicon Alley Insider (launched May 16, 2007) and Clusterstock (launched March 20, 2008) verticals. The site breaks and analyzes business news and acts as an aggregator of top news stories from around the web, each with an "edgy" commentary.

Their original works are often times cited by other larger global publications such as the New York Times <SUP id=cite_ref-0 class=reference>[1]</SUP> and domestic news outlets like NPR <SUP id=cite_ref-1 class=reference>[2]</SUP>
<SUP></SUP>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Insider
 
Last edited:

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
No matter what kind of lingo you want to use - and it is a battle of lingo when these comparison observations are made - there can be no doubt that the rich are getting MUCH richer, and the middle class and poor are getting poorer, at least comparatively speaking. If you'd prefer that there are more poor people now, or middle class heading down inflating the poor, that's fine for comparison sake.

I'm curious, you wanted to go line by line - do you find any of the lines inaccurate or wrong, since you want to find concern with the messenger? Or do you just want to make it all seem fuzzy, so the message is considered of less value - which helps your case, of course?

If you cannot dispute the numbers, are you then saying our economy has changed over the past years to benefit those with money, as that allows them to control the money and make more of it - leaving the VAST majority of the country farther and farther behind? Or do you dispute that? Are you saying the only people working hard and deserving the money they make are the upper 1% (or less) in our country? Everyone else just needs to work a little harder, to get to that place? Or is the system maintained and run specifically to help the select few really succeed to any top level? Or is the money just passed down from those select few holders to their family, which is supposedly why our forefathers left their country, BECAUSE the money was being controlled by a select few, and they couldn't make what they wanted to there?

Interesting topic - and the facts and figures seem to be pretty simple, in my view.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
The thing that I don't understand is why dogs argues on behalf of the rich elites in this country. As Chadman said the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Do you really think the middle class is working any less? No they are working harder and losing ground.
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
The thing that I don't understand is why dogs argues on behalf of the rich elites in this country. As Chadman said the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Do you really think the middle class is working any less? No they are working harder and losing ground.

Gee TU I kinda agree here....:scared :shrug:
 

Jaxx

Go Pokes!
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2003
7,084
88
48
FL
It's called socialism. One class of poeple and the government with handouts.
Capitolism is being choked out by taxes and restrictions. Unreal what this country has become in the last 2 years.
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
It's called socialism. One class of poeple and the government with handouts.
Capitolism is being choked out by taxes and restrictions. Unreal what this country has become in the last 2 years.

Hopefully in November things change...
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
It's called socialism. One class of poeple and the government with handouts.
Capitolism is being choked out by taxes and restrictions. Unreal what this country has become in the last 2 years.

2 years? WTF Some of you guys are so fucking stupid. Try 30 years.
 

Jaxx

Go Pokes!
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2003
7,084
88
48
FL
2 years? WTF Some of you guys are so fucking stupid. Try 30 years.

Funny how you think all posters are stupid except yourself. I have seen you post some of the dummest comments of anyone on here.
You on drugs again?

:mj07:
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
166
63
Bowling Green Ky
No matter what kind of lingo you want to use - and it is a battle of lingo when these comparison observations are made - there can be no doubt that the rich are getting MUCH richer, and the middle class and poor are getting poorer, at least comparatively speaking. If you'd prefer that there are more poor people now, or middle class heading down inflating the poor, that's fine for comparison sake.

I'm curious, you wanted to go line by line - do you find any of the lines inaccurate or wrong, since you want to find concern with the messenger? Or do you just want to make it all seem fuzzy, so the message is considered of less value - which helps your case, of course?

If you cannot dispute the numbers, are you then saying our economy has changed over the past years to benefit those with money, as that allows them to control the money and make more of it - leaving the VAST majority of the country farther and farther behind? Or do you dispute that? Are you saying the only people working hard and deserving the money they make are the upper 1% (or less) in our country? Everyone else just needs to work a little harder, to get to that place? Or is the system maintained and run specifically to help the select few really succeed to any top level? Or is the money just passed down from those select few holders to their family, which is supposedly why our forefathers left their country, BECAUSE the money was being controlled by a select few, and they couldn't make what they wanted to there?

Interesting topic - and the facts and figures seem to be pretty simple, in my view.

The rich have always gotten richer--and I believe all classes have gotten richer.

How many of our parents had multiple-cars- tvs-phones.

$22,000 was super pay--now poverty level.
granted inflation certainly comes into play-
-but consider lifestyles rich-middle and poor compared to 30 years ago.

--as I said earlier in thread--you put those 16 million illegals in system--and "Business Insider" can really pad those #'s--and indeed the % of middle class will shrink--but the actual # probably rise--unless Obama/liberals succeed in their redistribution efforts. :SIB
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
The rich have always gotten richer--and I believe all classes have gotten richer.

How many of our parents had multiple-cars- tvs-phones.

$22,000 was super pay--now poverty level.
granted inflation certainly comes into play-
-but consider lifestyles rich-middle and poor compared to 30 years ago.

--as I said earlier in thread--you put those 16 million illegals in system--and "Business Insider" can really pad those #'s--and indeed the % of middle class will shrink--but the actual # probably rise--unless Obama/liberals succeed in their redistribution efforts. :SIB

The only real way to compare in my view is the income comparison. There is a huge difference in what is considered wealthy and what is considered poor at this point in time - much more so than ever before. Percentage of wealth held by a few now, compared to the times you refer to - HUGE difference. And it has exploded over the past few years, much of that by design by conservatives to eliminate oversight and reduce tax burden, and promote benefits to the ultra-wealthy.

My parents had the things you mention, and they essentially lived paycheck to paycheck. Most of my friends parents were the same way. They used no credit for purchases, bought things as they could, but they never owned a home. Back then, though usually the wife did not work, mine didn't for quite awhile, but then had to to continue to make ends meet. Sure, families in general have more "stuff" and money, but usually both parents work now. Totally different scenario.

Not sure all classes can be considered "richer" over the past handful of years - a lot of wealth certainly went away, and a lot of people lost a lot - including homes, etc. A lot of people have been hurting for a few years now, except, of course, a few.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Funny how you think all posters are stupid except yourself. I have seen you post some of the dummest comments of anyone on here.
You on drugs again?

:mj07:

Actually I think you are pretty high on the list. Don't see yourself short.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
The rich have always gotten richer--and I believe all classes have gotten richer.

How many of our parents had multiple-cars- tvs-phones.

$22,000 was super pay--now poverty level.
granted inflation certainly comes into play-
-but consider lifestyles rich-middle and poor compared to 30 years ago.

--as I said earlier in thread--you put those 16 million illegals in system--and "Business Insider" can really pad those #'s--and indeed the % of middle class will shrink--but the actual # probably rise--unless Obama/liberals succeed in their redistribution efforts. :SIB

Buying power for the middle class has taken a huge hit since 1980. They are working more hours and getting less in return. Its very simple. I know you aren't in the elite class so I figured you would understand this. How hard is this for you to grasp.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
20,997
224
63
Jefferson City, Missouri
The Unions want to take credit for advancing the middleclass, how about they take credit for DESTROYING it with their agenda, good jobs with stupid work rules, Detroit is a prime example.

JMHO.

:D
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
There are those who discredit the Business Insider who hasn't played sides for the many quotes from this:

krauthammerdesksmall.jpg
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
For the rest--go line by line and ask yourself--is this result of middle class declining or poor increasing.
There it is. "It" of course being DTB's core belief that the poor are to blame for ALL of society's ills. It's a common theme in virtually all of his posts in this forum.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
It's called socialism. One class of poeple and the government with handouts.
Capitolism is being choked out by taxes and restrictions. Unreal what this country has become in the last 2 years.
One class of people???

The erosion of the middle-class began under the deregulation, union-busting and trickle-down "voodoo" ecomomics of the Reagan Administration. What Reagan set in motion, the Bushes expanded upon with tax cuts for the wealthy, tax loopholes and subsidies for corporations and the expansion of our military empire to levels unprecedented in modern history.

The result has been a steady erosion of the middle-class that threatens to leave the U.S. a two class society. And when that happens, empires fall. I'll take a one-class society over a two-class society in a heartbeat.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
166
63
Bowling Green Ky
The thing that I don't understand is why dogs argues on behalf of the rich elites in this country. As Chadman said the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Do you really think the middle class is working any less? No they are working harder and losing ground.

Funny thing Tramp appears even you Trench and muffins may be changing you tune with the rest of america-

Even the Poor Are Abandoning Obama, According to Gallup Poll Data
Friday, August 13, 2010
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief

CNSNews.com) - In every week of his presidency until now, Barack Obama has enjoyed a majority approval rating in the Gallup Poll from people earning less than $2,000 per month. But that changed in the Gallup survey conducted from Aug. 2-8, when only 49 percent of Americans in that income bracket said they approve of the job Obama is doing.

previously--


Obama?s approval peaked at 76 percent among Americans earning less than $2,000 per month in the weeks of April 20-26, 2009 and May 4-10, 2009.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top