2010: D-day for the Internet

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
Doom-filled warnings arrive from AT&T this week. The company says that without substantial investment in network infrastructure, the Internet will essentially run out of bandwidth in just two short years.:scared :scared :scared

Blame broadband, says AT&T. Decades of dealing with the trickle of bandwidth consumed by voice and dialup modems left AT&T twiddling its thumbs. The massive rise of DSL and cable modem service in the 2000s has had AT&T facing a monstrous increase in the volume of data transmissions. And that's set to increase another 50 times between now and 2015. That's enough, says AT&T, to all but crash the system.

In response, AT&T says it's investing $19 billion to upgrade the backbone of the Internet, the routers, servers, and connections where the bulk of traffic is processed.

Of course, AT&T is using this breathlessness in part to point fingers beyond simple broadband use. Web video (especially high-definition video) is the most commonly mentioned bandwidth hog. AT&T says video alone will eat up 80 percent of traffic in two years vs. just 30 percent now. One wonders how YouTube doesn't collapse under the pressure. Hmmm.

Meanwhile, many are wondering whether this is prelude to AT&T announcing (or not announcing, but doing anyway) a traffic prioritization/shaping system like Comcast has been tinkering with... and which has earned it nothing but scorn. Net neutrality (which would forbid premium pricing for certain Internet applications and destinations) is a topic that continues to be hotly debated on Capitol Hill, and telcos are anxious to kill the idea since they'd love to be able to charge additional money for different kinds of web traffic. If the whole Internet is about to crash, well, that makes AT&T's argument all the more compelling, doesn't it?
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,296
1,660
113
70
home
sounds like they're planting the seed in our minds and setting us up for a huge increase in price in a few years, now that internet is a necessity in the world.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,124
73
48
Toronto
sounds like they're planting the seed in our minds and setting us up for a huge increase in price in a few years, now that internet is a necessity in the world.

That's what I'm thinking. May not even be "huge" but will definitely spike.

I recently got a letter from my provider telling me my supposed internet usage along with mention that they can only provide so much with my current agreement. In other words, they want to start charging by usage instead of simply the flat rate I've been getting. Crap...not even being a download junkie like a few years back...increases are here already, for me, it appears.

Y2K is a good comparison.
However, I'm having trouble thinking of ways that we were milked by that alarmist propaganda, save for those that stockpiled Hendrix-knows-what.

If they make me king I will eliminate money.

FREE!!!

Barring that, let's crash some books.
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
I'm not computer literate..

but AT&T probably won't even be in the equation in the future of the net

much of it will be wireless :shrug:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top