DAMN... WHY DO THEY KEEP TURNING IT OVER CLOSE TO THE RED ZONE... WELL I GUESS ITS GOOD FOR MY RAIDERS PLAY.. I REALLY NEED TO STOP PLAYING SIDE AND TOTAL, ITS SO FRUSTRATION LOL
2H Thread for SD and OAK
- Thread starter DrRays
- Start date
YOU COULD CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS AND BLINDFOLD ME AND I COULD THROW BETTER THEN HIM
um. yea. repeat of the 1st h.... didnt expect this... at least my Oak + pts will cover.... too bad Oak may lose though... coin flip on who's worse in the 4th qtr.... worst team wins!
Jamarcus sucks and will hold back this Raiders team. I know his wideouts aren't much, but the Raiders appear to have a defense this year & a fair running game. They don't have a QB... they have a solid defensive line by adding Seymour and a solid secondary.
Ellis, Seymour, and company could be a nightmare for many offensive lines.
Ellis, Seymour, and company could be a nightmare for many offensive lines.
THEY WILL NOT WIN GAMES WITH THIS QB... THE FOURTH STRING IS PROBABLY BETTER.. IF THEY EVEN HAVE ONE
They should put Jamarcus at TE or tackle... he can at least block at 265
Give me a Raiders TD so I can go to bed. Have Faiders +10.5 and feel confident they wouldn't give up more than 17 in the 4th unless Jamarcus starts throwing pick 6's which I guess is possible.
Give me a Raiders TD so I can go to bed. Have Faiders +10.5 and feel confident they wouldn't give up more than 17 in the 4th unless Jamarcus starts throwing pick 6's which I guess is possible.
NEED 3 MORE BY OAKLAND TO PUSH THE TEAM TOTAL BET... NOT SURE IF IM GOING TO GET IT WITH RUSSEL AS QB
Well now I'm very worried. San Diego 17-13. I debated buying the spread to 11, but instead stopped at 10.5, wishing now I had bought the extra half-point so I could rest easier.
I have live betting and the number was SD -4 (-115) at the timeout. Debated playing this number, but held off. Could use a drive by Oakland PLEASE:0corn :mj06:
