5 Year Old Boy Mauled to Death by Pit Bulls
- Thread starter WhatsHisNuts
- Start date
Saint,
I was very clear all along about what i posted. I'm tired of fucking arguing with you. You're trying to tell me i said the fucking kid died because he had a bad heart and nothing could be further from the truth, but you think you're some type of private dick on here and continue to try to convey what you think my fucking thoughts on the goddamn subject are. I've explained them ad fucking nauseum, I'd you can't understand that then tough shit.
As a matter if fact if you do a little bit of private dick research I'll bet you find a post about a pit bull attack that involved a little girl and loo and behold some of the same fucking people here asked where the fucking parents were when their kid wandered into the neighbors yard. Add a matter of fact you may have been one of them. When asked to expand statement, I made it very clear what I was saying. The Joker understood it, why can't you? Because you don't want to because you want to argue and you aren't good at it.
Hope this helps,
FDC
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
Gary,
I don't know and i don't care anymore. I'm confident you knew it would more than likely get a response from me, but it doesn't matter man. It's just not worth it to me.
I will remain an advocate for the breeds. I don't post every story of a pit bull saving a life or a child. It serves no more purpose than this post did.
I'm also confident that anyone that knows me knew exactly what I meant about the child being unattended.
Yet here we are, i didn't defend the dogs, didn't say shit except that it stands to reason that a patent would and maybe should pay attention more to the whereabouts of a 5 year boy with a failing fucking heart and when you haven't seen or heard from him in a half hour or so, maybe, just fucking maybe they could have avoided the entire situation. How the fuck that doesn't make sense to an adult and parent is beyond me.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
I don't know and i don't care anymore. I'm confident you knew it would more than likely get a response from me, but it doesn't matter man. It's just not worth it to me.
I will remain an advocate for the breeds. I don't post every story of a pit bull saving a life or a child. It serves no more purpose than this post did.
I'm also confident that anyone that knows me knew exactly what I meant about the child being unattended.
Yet here we are, i didn't defend the dogs, didn't say shit except that it stands to reason that a patent would and maybe should pay attention more to the whereabouts of a 5 year boy with a failing fucking heart and when you haven't seen or heard from him in a half hour or so, maybe, just fucking maybe they could have avoided the entire situation. How the fuck that doesn't make sense to an adult and parent is beyond me.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
And sainy,
The heart defect is not fucking irrelevant, it's totally relevant.
Every parent in the world would pay more attention to the whereabouts or actions of a sick kid compared to a healthy one. If your kid had asthma or epilepsy, so parents check to see if they have their medication for school or a sleepover? That's being more attentive. It's absolutely relevant. The heart defect had nothing to do with his death. Nothing. His grandmother's inattentivenrss certainly put him in harms way. It's that fucking simple, so simple even you should understand it.
Now if you want me to explain it even further than ask. Don't assume you know a fucking thing about me or my thought processes.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
The heart defect is not fucking irrelevant, it's totally relevant.
Every parent in the world would pay more attention to the whereabouts or actions of a sick kid compared to a healthy one. If your kid had asthma or epilepsy, so parents check to see if they have their medication for school or a sleepover? That's being more attentive. It's absolutely relevant. The heart defect had nothing to do with his death. Nothing. His grandmother's inattentivenrss certainly put him in harms way. It's that fucking simple, so simple even you should understand it.
Now if you want me to explain it even further than ask. Don't assume you know a fucking thing about me or my thought processes.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
FDC, I'm convinced you're leveling us here!! U have to be. Good job. U really had me going. Best since Eddie Haskell and Private Petey. :0008
So i say his grandmother's inattentiveness and letting the boy play outside unattended with large dogs is irresponsible and i I'm looking foolish. You change "large dogs" to "pit bulls" and I'm making myself look foolish and deserving of your insults? Yeah that seems reasonable, thanks man. Really appreciate the kind words and all.
Fuck it. I'm done with this shit. Kill em all go ahead, Kill all the coyotes, dingos, foxes, wolves, bears, and bobcats. While we're at it let's give out more guns and allow road rage to exercise corporal punishment. We also need to get rid of bees and wasps, snakes, and every fucking thing else that you deem fit.
Fuck this I'm just getting more pissed. You know what Im going to say anyway right?
Out.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
No I'm not. All i did was read the goddamn post and made a comment that the fucking grandma was irresponsible in her responsibilities to watch the fucking kid and i get this shit. I didn't defend the dogs, i didn't do a fucking thing but point out that a sick kid should have been more attended to and i have to suffer through saint and you telling me my intent was to say the heart defect caused his death. Even though I've explained myself about ten times, but who gives a fuck. I'm just a fucking fool.
And if you're catching the anger and disappointment in my tone than you're spot on again. If you don't know why I'd be upset then maybe ask saint or read my mind again. If he doesn't know, maybe you two aren't all up in my head and intentions as much as you thought.
Not a joke at all Clint, i assure you. In all honesty, you hurt my fucking feelings and I don't normally expect that from my friends. It's not my nature, but everyone can make as much fun of that as they want, I don't care. I generally wear my feelings on my sleeve, but I was sure you knew that, until now I mean. It is what it is.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
Tanner's mother brought her son along to a visit with her friend, whose father owns the home and dogs, police said. That man was assumed to be outside with Tanner, but he was not there when the dogs attacked the five-year-old boy in the fenced-in yard, cops said.
When Tanner's mother realized that the man was not outside, she rushed to the yard to discover her son had been attacked.
This doesn't quite sound like 'leaving your 5 year old alone with the dogs'.
When Tanner's mother realized that the man was not outside, she rushed to the yard to discover her son had been attacked.
This doesn't quite sound like 'leaving your 5 year old alone with the dogs'.
You're right, it's sounds much more like leaving your child unattended and without supervision in the company of two large dogs without checking to see if anyone was with him. Then once the kid was bleeding out she said she "assumed" and "thought" he was being watched. If course this is all under the "assumption" that it's somebody's friends father's responsibility to ensure your child is safe. I didn't know that visiting a friend meant their parents assume your custodial responsibilities.
Since everyone is so into assumption, isn't it just as reasonable to "assume" that when questioned that grandma said, "i thought Jethro was out there with him, it wasn't my fault, blah blah blah". Sounds reasonable to me, but what do I know, I'm just a fucking fool. Apparently being mindful and attentive towards your children is only important when others can make a point about their own parenting skills. You know, like in the school shooting threads, another dog attack thread, etc. .. yep that's when parenting matters, but don't try to point that out to anyone when they have a fucking agenda. How dare you.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
For instance this tidbit from Gary in Previous thread concerning pit bull attacks;
For the record, I think they need to start jailing parents of menaces to society. There should be consequences. I've been very consistent on this.
While I admit that Gary has not spoken to the contrary in this thread, he sure as fuck didn't get vilified and called a fool for talking about parental responsibility, but maybe that's because he has the same opinion towards pit bulls as many others on here that don't understand them.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
For the record, I think they need to start jailing parents of menaces to society. There should be consequences. I've been very consistent on this.
While I admit that Gary has not spoken to the contrary in this thread, he sure as fuck didn't get vilified and called a fool for talking about parental responsibility, but maybe that's because he has the same opinion towards pit bulls as many others on here that don't understand them.
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
There sure is more to life than dogs. I think dogs are just a big pain in the ass...............:SIB
Cris
Cris
The next time someone makes a post about Pitbulls (and you know there will be a next time) you should ignore it. Just think how it will fucking irritate some of the posters who want to get to you. You know what I mean man, they'll think just wait until FDC comes in here - then I can stir up some shit and get under his skin and make him look like the villain, hehehe. Anyway, you catch my drift. Ignoring it is probably the best course of action. Yeah, I'm not very good at this too but I do let things go, even when they are stupid. Watch this thread die now w/o anymore responses from you.
BTW, I have no experience with Pitbulls but my three chihuahuas substitute as a doorbell.
kneifl
Cris
The next time someone makes a post about Pitbulls (and you know there will be a next time) you should ignore it. Just think how it will fucking irritate some of the posters who want to get to you. You know what I mean man, they'll think just wait until FDC comes in here - then I can stir up some shit and get under his skin and make him look like the villain, hehehe. Anyway, you catch my drift. Ignoring it is probably the best course of action. Yeah, I'm not very good at this too but I do let things go, even when they are stupid. Watch this thread die now w/o anymore responses from you.
BTW, I have no experience with Pitbulls but my three chihuahuas substitute as a doorbell.
kneifl
these graphs are absolute garbage, because the statistics are gathered simply from un screened and very biased media reports. Every serious researcher in this field know such data is pure garbage.
the only decent study I've seen on dog bites and breeds, the authors discovered that media reports contradicted each other over 36% of the time the attack involved multiple dogs, over 20% of the time in even single dog attacks. Over 43% of the time the animal control officer's report contradicted the media in multiple dog incidents, over 34% in single dog incidents.
the only decent study I've seen on dog bites and breeds, the authors discovered that media reports contradicted each other over 36% of the time the attack involved multiple dogs, over 20% of the time in even single dog attacks. Over 43% of the time the animal control officer's report contradicted the media in multiple dog incidents, over 34% in single dog incidents.
